scholarly journals How does the Covid-19 pandemic affect provider-patient relations?

2021 ◽  
Vol 104 (3) ◽  
pp. 437
Author(s):  
Arnstein Finset
Keyword(s):  
1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 23-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela J. Para

Author(s):  
Zekun Wang ◽  
Zhaohua Deng ◽  
Xiang Wu

Background: Incidents of violence against medical staff have increased in intensity, showing the deteriorating relationship between doctors and patients in China over the past few years. In addition, professional–patient relations have been significantly affected in the Internet era in China, which has attracted great attention from many scholars. This study aims to analyze the research status of professional–patient relations in the Internet era in China and further reveal its research pattern and trends. Methods: This study collected journal articles published during the past 21 years from the Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform. Then, bibliometric analysis was carried out, including publication growth, core author and collaborative degree, highly cited papers, journal distribution, and institution distribution analyses. We also analyzed the subject heading–source literature matrix and co-occurrence matrix of keywords through hierarchical cluster, social network, and strategic diagram analyses. Results: The number of articles has continually risen since 1998, which follows the growth law of literature. Furthermore, the distribution of these studies obeys Bradford’s law of scattering, and mainly concentrates on the fields of medicine and health technology. The distribution of high-frequency keywords follows Zipf’s law. Conclusions: We identified eight focal research directions, namely: website building (especially for professional–patient interaction), telemedicine, professional–patient communication and network public opinion, professional–patient contradiction and health education, new media, follow-up interaction platform, healthcare reform and computer network, and medical ethics.


Author(s):  
Ivan Cavicchi

To know the complexity of patient the clinic should think about the relations of complexity which can bond scientific evidence and doctor and patient. To think and to act according to the relations means to settle a clinic, pragmatic and reasonable rational.


2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 476-502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrin Amelang ◽  
Susanne Bauer

Epidemiological risk scores are calculative devices that mediate and enact versions of accountability in public health and preventive medicine. This article focuses on practices of accountability by following a cardiovascular risk score widely used in medical counselling in Germany. We follow the risk score in the making, in action, and in circulation to explore how the score performs in doctor-patient relations, how it recombines epidemiological results, and how it shapes knowledge production and healthcare provision. In this way, we follow the risk score’s various trajectories – from its development at the intersection of epidemiology, general medicine and software engineering, to its usage in general practitioners’ offices, and its validation infrastructures. Exploring the translations from population to individual and back that are at work in the risk score and in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease, we examine how versions and distributions of accountability are invoked and practiced as the score is developed and put to use. The case of a simple risk score used in everyday counselling brings into relief some key shifts in configurations of accountability with emerging versions of ‘health by the algorithm’. While there is an increasing authority of algorithmic tools in the fabric of clinical encounters, risk scores are interwoven with local specificities of the healthcare system and continue to be in the making.


1964 ◽  
Vol 64 (9) ◽  
pp. 133-134
Author(s):  
ELSIE BANDMAN ◽  
SHEILA WOLPIN ◽  
DOROTHY REHM

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document