GIP and GLP-2 together improve bone turnover in humans supporting GIPR-GLP-2R co-agonists as future osteoporosis treatment

2022 ◽  
pp. 106058
Author(s):  
Maria Buur Nordskov Gabe ◽  
Kirsa Skov-Jeppesen ◽  
Lærke Smidt Gasbjerg ◽  
Sine Pasch Schiellerup ◽  
Christoffer Martinussen ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 963-974 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Boonen ◽  
Serge Ferrari ◽  
Paul D Miller ◽  
Erik F Eriksen ◽  
Philip N Sambrook ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Eastell ◽  
Rosemary A. Hannon

The assay features of biochemical markers of bone turnover have markedly improved in the past few years. The most sensitive and specific markers of bone formation include serum bone alkaline phosphatase, total osteocalcin (including the intact molecule and the large N-mid fragment) and the procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide assay. Among the various markers of bone resorption, measurements of the urinary excretion of N- and C-terminal cross-linked telopeptides) and of serum C-terminal cross-linked telopeptides are the most sensitive and specific. Markers of bone turnover can be used to predict the rate of bone loss in post-menopausal women and can also be used to assess the risk of fractures. In osteoporosis-treatment studies (with alendronate, risedronate, raloxifene) markers of bone turnover appear even more strongly associated with fracture risk reduction than bone mineral density (BMD). These observations support the use of markers of bone turnover as surrogates for fracture risk reduction, perhaps even more so than BMD. Bone markers can also be used to monitor the efficacy of antiresorptive therapy such as hormone-replacement therapy, raloxifene and bisphosphonates in individual patients. Furthermore, they have also proved to be helpful in monitoring the response to nutritional interventions and have the advantage over BMD in that they provide information about mechanism of effect and changes are often observed much more rapidly.


2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 213 ◽  
Author(s):  
So Young Park ◽  
Seong Hee Ahn ◽  
Jun-Il Yoo ◽  
Youn-Jee Chung ◽  
Yun Kyung Jeon ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 370-373
Author(s):  
Mehmet Okçu ◽  
Fatmanur Aybala Koçak ◽  
Samet Sancar Kaya ◽  
Figen Tuncay

Bisphosphonates are commonly used in the treatment of osteoporosis. Atypical femoral fracture (AFF) is a well-known adverse effect of bisphosphonate use. The importance of genetic factors has been demonstrated in bone quality, bone turnover, and in the response to osteoporosis treatment. Herein, we present two cases of bilateral AFFs after bisphosphonate use for a short period of time in members of the same family (mother and her daughter) and discuss genetic predisposition to bisphosphonate-induced AFFs in the light of literature data.


2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (11) ◽  
pp. 2416-2416
Author(s):  
Steven Boonen ◽  
Serge Ferrari ◽  
Paul D Miller ◽  
Erik F Eriksen ◽  
Philip N Sambrook ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 183 (1) ◽  
pp. C5-C7
Author(s):  
Rui Zhen Tan ◽  
Tze Ping Loh ◽  
Samuel Vasikaran

2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (11) ◽  
pp. 2414-2415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Boonen ◽  
Serge Ferrari ◽  
Paul D Miller ◽  
Erik F Eriksen ◽  
Philip N Sambrook ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document