Functional outcomes after flexor tendon repair of the hand: preliminary results of a Sowetan population in South Africa

Physiotherapy ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 101 ◽  
pp. e1428
Author(s):  
T. Spark ◽  
V. Ntsiea ◽  
L. Godlwana
Hand ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 141S-141S
Author(s):  
Taryn Spark ◽  
Veronica Ntsiea ◽  
Lonwabo Godlwana

Hand ◽  
2022 ◽  
pp. 155894472110643
Author(s):  
Clay B. Townsend ◽  
Tyler W. Henry ◽  
Jonas L. Matzon ◽  
Daniel Seigerman ◽  
Samir C. Sodha ◽  
...  

Background: Flexor tendon lacerations in the fingers are challenging injuries that can be repaired using the wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) technique or under traditional anesthesia (TA). The purpose of our study was to compare the functional outcomes and complication rates of patients undergoing flexor tendon repair under WALANT versus TA. Methods: All patients who underwent a primary flexor tendon repair in zone I and II without tendon graft for closed avulsions or open lacerations between 2015 and 2019 were identified. Electronic medical records were reviewed to record and compare patient demographics, range of motion, functional outcomes, complications, and reoperations. Results: Sixty-five zone I (N = 21) or II (N = 44) flexor tendon repairs were included in the final analysis: 23 WALANT and 42 TA. There were no statistical differences in mean age, length of follow-up, proportion of injured digits, or zone of injury between the groups. The final Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score in the WALANT group was 17.2 (SD: 14.4) versus 23.3 (SD: 18.5) in the TA group. There were no statistical differences between the groups with any final range of motion (ROM) parameters, grip strength, or Visual Analog Scale pain scores at the final follow-up. The WALANT group was found to have a slightly higher reoperation rate (26.1% vs 7.1%; P = .034) than the TA group. Conclusions: This study represents one of the first clinical studies reporting outcomes of flexor tendon repairs performed under WALANT. Overall, we found no difference in rupture rates, ROM, and functional outcomes following zone I and II flexor tendon repairs when performed under WALANT versus TA.


1999 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 148-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. GUINARD ◽  
F. MONTANIER ◽  
D. THOMAS ◽  
D. CORCELLA ◽  
F. MOUTET

Mantero and colleagues have reported a modification of the Bunnell pull-out method for the repair of zone 1 flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) lacerations that allows active postoperative mobilization. We report a series of 24 FDP lesions in 20 adult patients treated with this technique. The mean duration of the rehabilitation regimen, which was followed by all patients, was 4.2 months. Functional assessment using Strickland’s criteria demonstrated 23 excellent to good results and one poor due to a septic rupture. Nineteen of the 20 patients were satisfied with treatment and all but one of the patients returned to work within an average of 2.6 months after operation. In comparison to other zone 1 repair methods with active mobilization regimens, the Mantero technique gives better functional outcomes and appears to be more reliable.


2008 ◽  
Vol 80 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ireneusz Walaszek ◽  
Andrzej Żyluk ◽  
Bernard Piotuch

2006 ◽  
Vol 39 (01) ◽  
pp. 94-102
Author(s):  
G. Balakrishnan

ABSTRACTStronger flexor tendon repairs facilitate early active motion therapy protocols. Core sutures using looped suture material provide 1 ½ to twice the strength of Kessler′s technique (with four strand and six strand Tsuge technique respectively). The technique is well-described and uses preformed looped sutures (supramid). This is not available in many countries and we describe a technique whereby looped sutures can be introduced in flexor tendon repair by the use of 23 G hypodermic needle and conventional 4.0 or 5.0 sutures. This is an alternative when the custom made preformed sutures are not available. This can be practiced in zone 3 to zone 5 repairs. Technical difficulties limit its use in zone 2 repairs.


1985 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. B. NIELSEN ◽  
P. Ø. JENSEN

The methods used by Buck-Gramcko, Kleinert and Tsuge in evaluating the functional results of flexor tendon repair were each applied to assess the functional outcome in sixty-seven fingers where both tendons had been severed in “no man's land”. The method of Buck-Gramcko gave the highest rating, and the three methods showed evident differences in the results of evaluation after surgery. The study suggests a need for one standard method of measurement and recording, if a comparison of results after flexor tendon repair is to be of value. We found that the method of Buck-Gramcko incorporated the most essential features in the functional evaluation.


2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 234-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Haddad ◽  
T. Peltz ◽  
N. Bertollo ◽  
W. R. Walsh ◽  
S. Nicklin

Multiple-strand repair techniques are commonly used to repair cut flexor tendons to achieve initial biomechanical strength. Looped sutures achieve multiple strands with fewer passes and less technical complexity. Their biomechanical performance in comparison with an equivalent repair using a single-stranded suture is uncertain. This study examined the mechanical properties of double-stranded loops of 3-0 and 4-0 braided polyester (Ticron) and polypropylene monofilament (Prolene). Double loops were generally less than twice the strength of a single loop. Ticron and Prolene had the same strengths, but Ticron was stiffer. The 4-0 double loops had significantly higher stiffness than 3-0 single loops. Increasing the size of sutures had a larger relative effect on strength than using a double-stranded suture. However, a double-strand loop had a larger effect on increasing stiffness than using a single suture of a larger equivalent size. Looped suture repairs should be compared with standard techniques using a thicker single suture.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document