Evaluation of Chronic, Noncancer Pain Management Initiative in a Multidisciplinary Pain Clinic

Author(s):  
Latha Panicker ◽  
Marilyn A. Prasun ◽  
Cherrill Stockmann ◽  
Jolene Simon
2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 276-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leah R Pink ◽  
Andrew J Smith ◽  
Philip WH Peng ◽  
Marilyn J Galonski ◽  
Paul S Tumber ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND: The present article outlines the process of instituting an assessment of risk of problematic use of medications with new patients in an ambulatory chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) clinic. It is hoped that the authors’ experience through this iterative process will fill the gap in the literature by setting an example of an application of the ‘universal precautions’ approach to chronic pain management.OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility and utility of the addition of a new risk assessment process and to provide a snapshot of the risk of problematic use of medications in new patients presenting to a tertiary ambulatory clinic treating CNCP.METHODS: Charts for the first three months following the institution of an intake assessment for risk of problematic medication use were reviewed. Health care providers at the Wasser Pain Management Centre (Toronto, Ontario) were interviewed to discuss the preliminary findings and provide feedback about barriers to completing the intake assessments, as well as to identify the items that were clinically relevant and useful to their practice.RESULTS: Data were analyzed and examined for completeness. While some measures were considered to be particularly helpful, other items were regarded as repetitive, problematic or time consuming. Feedback was then incorporated into revisions of the risk assessment tool.DISCUSSION: Overall, it is feasible and useful to assess risk for problematic use of medications in new patients presenting to CNCP clinics.CONCLUSION: To facilitate the practice of assessment, the risk assessment tool at intake must be concise, clinically relevant and feasible given practitioner time constraints.


2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 559-566
Author(s):  
Natalia P. Arizmendez ◽  
Fabiana Kotovicz ◽  
Jessica J. F. Kram ◽  
Dennis J. Baumgardner

2009 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. e102-e109
Author(s):  
Emily Weidman-Evans ◽  
Tibb F. Jacobs ◽  
Philip Isherwood ◽  
Jeffery D. Evans ◽  
Tara Jenkins

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 558-567 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brandi L. Bowers ◽  
Andrew J. Crannage

Nationally, the prescription of opioids for acute and chronic pain is increasing. As opioid use continues to expand and become of increased concern for health-care practitioners, so do the adverse effects and long-term management of those effects. Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) presents a unique challenge because tolerance does not develop to this particular adverse effect, making chronic pain management a delicate balance between relieving pain and preventing long-term adverse effects such as constipation and dependence. Several agents have been developed for the treatment of OIC in patients with chronic noncancer pain on the basis of short-term studies of 12 weeks or less. However, chronic pain management often extends beyond this 12-week boundary, resulting in health-care professionals questioning the safety and efficacy of continued treatment with OIC agents. This review evaluates available literature on long-term treatment of OIC in patients with chronic noncancer pain with lubiprostone, naloxegol, and methylnaltrexone as well as preliminary results of the recently completed naldemedine long-term trial, COMPOSE-3.


Pain Medicine ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. 1743-1749 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shehnaz Fatima Lakha ◽  
Ada F. Louffat ◽  
Keith Nicholson ◽  
Amol Deshpande ◽  
Angela Mailis-Gagnon

2014 ◽  
Vol 127 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ethem Kavukcu ◽  
Melahat Akdeniz ◽  
Hasan Huseyin Avci ◽  
Mehmet Altuğ ◽  
Mehmet Öner

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document