The Perceived Needs of Nurse Clinicians as They Move Into an Adjunct Clinical Faculty Role

2013 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 295-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karin K. Roberts ◽  
Susan Kasal Chrisman ◽  
Connie Flowers
2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 319-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jill M. Forcina Hill ◽  
Lisa Woodley ◽  
Megan Goodwin

2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Y. Moon ◽  
Shannon Reidt ◽  
Megan Undeberg ◽  
Anne Schullo-Feulner

Objectives: To describe the evolving process and evaluate the perceived value of peer review for clinical faculty. Methods: Using a 5-point Likert scale, clinical faculty rated the value of an electronic peer review process by completing an electronic 30 item survey across six areas of clinical faculty practice-related activity. Based on feedback, modifications were made and faculty were re-surveyed the following year. Results: Initially, 78% of faculty found peer review to be beneficial, mostly in the area of practice development and portions of practice dissemination. After modifications, 45% found peer review to be beneficial. Conclusions: Clinical faculty are challenged to leverage their practice into teaching and scholarly activities; however, clinical faculty often need feedback to accomplish this. Although the peer review process was designed to address perceived needs of clinical faculty, the process is dynamic and needs further refinement. Overall, clinical faculty find value in a peer review process. This evaluation of peer review illustrates the challenges to provide feedback across six key areas of clinical faculty activity.   Type: Original Research


2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. 80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah A. Prichard ◽  
Peggy Ward-Smith

Background: Academic success in programs of nursing requires successful completion of didactic and clinical activities. Failure, in didactic situations, is objectively determined. Clinical failure is determined subjectively, which may expose the competency and reputation of the clinical faculty. This scenario can result in a hesitancy, or a reluctance to fail a student. Graduation may occur in the presence of limited clinical competency resulting in new graduates who are not adequately prepared for professional nursing practice.Methods: Exploring the concept of reluctance to fail will provide a conceptual definition based on uses of the concept found in research studies. Walker and Avant (2011) describe an eight step concept analysis process which will be utilized to determine the defining attributes, antecedents, consequences and empirical referents of the concept of reluctance to fail.Results: The result of this concept analysis is a conceptual model depicting reluctance to fail as a circular phenomenon with various elements. Guided by the intervention needed to address the deficiency, these elements may be placed in one of three categories: education of faculty, role modeling, and peer support.Conclusions: Education of clinical faculty will diminish the unwillingness, and hesitancy elements. Role modeling activities will prevent fear as rationale for reluctance to fail. Peer support provides emotional support when guilt for assigning a failing grade occurs. Future research must be conducted to identify factors responsible for faculty reluctance to assign failing grades, as well as the effectiveness of these interventions. 


2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-81
Author(s):  
Scott Ziehm ◽  
Dorrie K. Fontaine

There has never been a more urgent time for clinically expert nurses to consider the clinical faculty role. Whether they are making a full-time “leap” into academia or combining a successful staff nurse role with a part-time clinical teaching position, nurses should consider teaching as a good career move. Practical tips and resources are described for making the transition into a clinical faculty role a smooth one.


1985 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 159-161
Author(s):  
B Lange ◽  
R Friedman

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nidhi Goel ◽  
Rohini Puri ◽  
Chu-Chun Fu ◽  
Melissa Stormont ◽  
Wendy M. Reinke

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document