Nursing students' satisfaction with the curriculum: An integrative review

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 648-661
Author(s):  
Silvia Rossini ◽  
Giampiera Bulfone ◽  
Ercole Vellone ◽  
Rosaria Alvaro
2016 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
pp. 40-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Walker ◽  
Dolene Rossi ◽  
Jennifer Anastasi ◽  
Gillian Gray-Ganter ◽  
Rebeka Tennent

Author(s):  
Ana Rosa Alconero-Camarero ◽  
Carmen María Sarabia-Cobo ◽  
María José Catalán-Piris ◽  
Silvia González-Gómez ◽  
José Rafael González-López

Training based on clinical simulation is an effective method of teaching in nursing. Nevertheless, there is no clear evidence about if it is better to use high- or medium-fidelity simulation. The aim is to analyse if students are more satisfied when their clinical simulation practices are based on high-fidelity simulation (HFS) or medium-fidelity simulation (MFS). Students´ satisfaction was assessed using the Satisfaction Scale Questionnaire with High-Fidelity Clinical Simulation. The sample is composed of 393 students from two Spanish Universities. Satisfaction with simulation in nursing students is significantly greater in MFS than HFS. Simulation is beneficial for learning in all its forms, but for the acquisition of basic skills, and at a lower cost, MFS proves to be effective. However, high-fidelity is not always better than medium-fidelity as this depends on the student’s level of knowledge and clinical experience.


2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 1119-1131
Author(s):  
Sharoon Shahzad ◽  
Nizar Ali ◽  
Ahtisham Younas ◽  
Jude L. Tayaben

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leodoro J. Labrague ◽  
Denise M. McEnroe‐Petitte ◽  
Melba Sheila D'Souza ◽  
Karen S. Hammad ◽  
Jahara Noor Ali Hayudini

2020 ◽  
Vol 88 ◽  
pp. 104389
Author(s):  
Jacoline Sommer Albert ◽  
Ahtisham Younas ◽  
Sedira Sana

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document