Lower mean heart dose with deep inspiration breath hold-whole breast irradiation compared with brachytherapy-based accelerated partial breast irradiation for women with left-sided tumors

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 80-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma B. Holliday ◽  
Steve M. Kirsner ◽  
Howard D. Thames ◽  
Bryan E. Mason ◽  
Christopher L. Nelson ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 109-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karthick Raj Mani ◽  
Suresh Poudel ◽  
K J Maria Das

Abstract Purpose: To investigate the cardio-pulmonary doses between Deep Inspiration Breath Hold (DIBH) and Free Breathing (FB) technique in left sided breast irradiation. Materials & Methods: DIBH CT and FB CT were acquired for 10 left sided breast patients who underwent whole breast irradiation with or without nodal irradiation. Three fields single isocenter technique were used for patients with node positive patients along with two tangential conformal fields whereas only two tangential fields were used in node negative patients. All the critical structures like lungs, heart, esophagus, thyroid, etc., were delineated in both DIBH and FB scan. Both DIBH and FB scans were fused with the Dicom origin as they were acquired with the same Dicom coordinates. Plans were created in the DIBH scan for a dose range between 50 Gy in 25 fractions. Critical structures doses were recorded from the Dose Volume Histogram for both the DIBH and FB data set for evaluation. Results: The average mean heart dose in DIBH vs FB was 13.18 Gy vs 6.97 Gy, (p = 0.0063) significantly with DIBH as compared to FB technique. The relative reduction in average mean heart dose was 47.12%. The relative V5 reduced by 14.70% (i.e. 34.42% vs 19.72%, p = 0.0080), V10 reduced by 13.83% (i.e. 27.79 % vs 13.96%, p = 0.0073). V20 reduced by 13.19% (i.e. 24.54 % vs 11.35%, p = 0.0069), V30 reduced by 12.38% (i.e. 22.27 % vs 9.89 %, p = 0.0073) significantly with DIBH as compared to FB. The average mean left lung dose reduced marginally by 1.43 Gy (13.73 Gy vs 12.30 Gy, p = 0.4599) but insignificantly with DIBH as compared to FB. Other left lung parameters (V5, V10, V20 and V30) shows marginal decreases in DIBH plans compare to FB plans. Conclusion: DIBH shows a substantial reduction of cardiac doses but slight and insignificant reduction of pulmonary doses as compared with FB technique. Using the simple DIBH technique, we can effectively reduce the cardiac morbidity and at the same time radiation induced lung pneumonitis is unlikely to increase.


2015 ◽  
Vol 114 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Mulliez ◽  
Liv Veldeman ◽  
Bruno Speleers ◽  
Khalil Mahjoubi ◽  
Vincent Remouchamps ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 280-287
Author(s):  
Sarah B. Wisnoskie ◽  
Xiaoying Liang ◽  
Andrew O. Wahl ◽  
Nathan R. Bennion ◽  
Andrew D. Granatowicz ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Mulliez ◽  
Liv Veldeman ◽  
Tom Vercauteren ◽  
Werner De Gersem ◽  
Bruno Speleers ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 447-456 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryohei Yamauchi ◽  
Norifumi Mizuno ◽  
Tomoko Itazawa ◽  
Hidetoshi Saitoh ◽  
Jiro Kawamori

Abstract Deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) is a common method used worldwide for reducing the radiation dose to the heart. However, few studies have reported on the relationship between dose reduction and patient-specific parameters. The aim of this study was to compare the reductions of heart dose and volume using DIBH with the dose/volume of free breathing (FB) for patients with left-sided breast cancer and to analyse patient-specific dose reduction parameters. A total of 85 Asian patients who underwent whole-breast radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery were recruited. Treatment plans for FB and DIBH were retrospectively generated by using an automated breast planning tool with a two-field tangential intensity-modulated radiation therapy technique. The prescribed dose was 50 Gy in 25 fractions. The dosimetric parameters (e.g., mean dose and maximum dose) in heart and lung were extracted from the dose–volume histogram. The relationships between dose–volume data and patient-specific parameters, such as age, body mass index (BMI), and inspiratory volume, were analyzed. The mean heart doses for the FB and DIBH plans were 1.56 Gy and 0.75 Gy, respectively, a relative reduction of 47%. There were significant differences in all heart dosimetric parameters (p < 0.001). For patients with a high heart dose in the FB plan, a relative reduction of the mean heart dose correlated with inspiratory volume (r = 0.646). There was correlation between the relative reduction of mean heart dose and BMI (r = −0.248). We recommend considering the possible feasibility of DIBH in low BMI patients because the degree of benefit from DIBH varied with BMI.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 181-188
Author(s):  
Pitchaya Sakyanun ◽  
Kitwadee Saksornchai ◽  
Chonnipa Nantavithya ◽  
Chakkapong Chakkabat ◽  
Kanjana Shotelersuk

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document