Corrigendum to “Ultrasonography of multifidus muscle morphology and function in ice hockey players with and without low back pain” [Physical Therapy in Sport 37 (2019) 77–85]

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 ◽  
pp. 16
Author(s):  
Maryse Fortin ◽  
Amanda Rizk ◽  
Stephane Frenette ◽  
Mathieu Boily ◽  
Hassan Rivaz
2019 ◽  
Vol 37 ◽  
pp. 77-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryse Fortin ◽  
Amanda Rizk ◽  
Stephane Frenette ◽  
Mathieu Boily ◽  
Hassan Rivaz

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryse Fortin ◽  
Daniel Wolfe ◽  
Geoffrey Dover ◽  
Mathieu Boily

Abstract BackgroundNeuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is used to improve muscle strength clinically when rehabilitating various musculoskeletal disorders. However, the effects of NMES on muscle morphology and function in individuals with non-specific chronic low back pain (CLBP) have scarcely been investigated. Although research links deficits in the paraspinal musculature with subjective reports of pain and disability, it is unknown if treatment with NMES can help reverse these deficits. Therefore, the primary aim of this study is to compare the effects of two muscle therapy protocols with a medium-frequency electrotherapy device (the StimaWELL 120MTRS system) on multifidus muscle morphology in CLBP patients. The secondary aims are to determine the effects of these protocols on multifidus muscle function, as well as subjective reports of pain intensity, pain interference, disability, and catastrophizing. MethodsA total of 30 participants with non-specific CLBP, aged 18-60, will be recruited from local orthopedic clinics and databases. Participants will be randomized (1:1) to either the phasic or combined (phasic + tonic) muscle therapy protocols on the StimaWELL 120MTRS system. Participants will undergo 20 supervised electrotherapy treatments over a 10-week period. The primary outcomes will be multifidus cross-sectional area (CSA) and fat infiltration. Secondary outcomes will include multifidus contraction (measured via %thickness change from a rested to contracted state), multifidus stiffness (at rest, and during contraction), as well as pain intensity, interference, disability, and catastrophizing. Both primary and secondary outcomes will be obtained at baseline and at 11-weeks; secondary outcomes measured via questionnaires will also be obtained at 6-weeks, while low back pain intensity will be measured before and after each treatment. Paired t-tests will be used to assess within-group changes for all primary outcome measures. A two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance will be use to assess changes in secondary outcomes over time. DiscussionThe results of this trial will help clarify the role of medium-frequency NMES on lumbar multifidus morphology and function. Trial RegistrationNCT04891692 Trial SponsorConcordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada


Spine ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 39 (17) ◽  
pp. 1417-1425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey J. Hebert ◽  
Per Kjaer ◽  
Julie M. Fritz ◽  
Bruce F. Walker

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 943-945 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Pillastrini ◽  
Silvano Ferrari ◽  
Silvia Rattin ◽  
Andrea Cupello ◽  
Jorge Hugo Villafañe ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie M. Fritz ◽  
Shannon N. Clifford

Abstract Context: Back pain is common in adolescents. Participation in sports has been identified as a risk factor for the development of back pain in adolescents, but the influence of sports participation on treatment outcomes in adolescents has not been adequately examined. Objective: To examine the clinical outcomes of rehabilitation for adolescents with low back pain (LBP) and to evaluate the influence of sports participation on outcomes. Design: Observational study. Setting: Outpatient physical therapy clinics. Patients or Other Participants: Fifty-eight adolescents (age  =  15.40 ± 1.44 years; 56.90% female) with LBP referred for treatment. Twenty-three patients (39.66%) had developed back pain from sports participation. Intervention(s): Patients completed the Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire and numeric pain rating before and after treatment. Treatment duration and content were at the clinician's discretion. Adolescents were categorized as sports participants if the onset of back pain was linked to organized sports. Additional data collected included diagnostic imaging before referral, clinical characteristics, and medical diagnosis. Main Outcome Measure(s): Baseline characteristics were compared based on sports participation. The influence of sports participation on outcomes was examined using a repeated-measures analysis of covariance with the Oswestry and pain scores as dependent variables. The number of sessions and duration of care were compared using t tests. Results: Many adolescents with LBP receiving outpatient physical therapy treatment were involved in sports and cited sports participation as a causative factor for their LBP. Some differences in baseline characteristics and clinical treatment outcomes were noted between sports participants and nonparticipants. Sports participants were more likely to undergo magnetic resonance imaging before referral (P  =  .013), attended more sessions (mean difference  =  1.40, 95% confidence interval [CI]  =  0.21, 2.59, P  =  .022) over a longer duration (mean difference  =  12.44 days, 95% CI  =  1.28, 23.10, P  =  .024), and experienced less improvement in disability (mean Oswestry difference  =  6.66, 95% CI  =  0.53, 12.78, P  =  .048) than nonparticipants. Overall, the pattern of clinical outcomes in this sample of adolescents with LBP was similar to that of adults with LBP. Conclusions: Adolescents with LBP due to sports participation received more treatment but experienced less improvement in disability than nonparticipants. This may indicate a worse prognosis for sports participants. Further research is required.


1988 ◽  
Vol 68 (2) ◽  
pp. 199-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven S. Overman ◽  
John W. Larson ◽  
Deborah A. Dickstein ◽  
Paul H. Rockey

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document