Target delineation in stereotactic body radiation therapy for recurrent head and neck cancer: A retrospective analysis of the impact of margins and automated PET-CT segmentation

2013 ◽  
Vol 106 (1) ◽  
pp. 90-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle Wang ◽  
Dwight E. Heron ◽  
David A. Clump ◽  
John C. Flickinger ◽  
Gregory J. Kubicek ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6543-6543
Author(s):  
Michelle Echevarria ◽  
Christine H. Chung ◽  
Kedar Kirtane ◽  
Jameel Muzaffar ◽  
John Arrington ◽  
...  

6543 Background: For patients with unresectable, previously radiated, locoregionally recurrent head and neck cancer, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has become an attractive option. The use of high daily doses of radiotherapy may overcome the inherent radioresistance of these recurrent cancers. Given the resistant and advanced nature of many of these cancers, the addition of chemotherapy to radiotherapy is typically recommended as a radiosensitizer. We therefore performed a phase I clinical trial in order to establish a maximum tolerated dose of SBRT with concurrent chemotherapy in locoregionally recurrent head and neck cancer. Methods: Major inclusion criteria were recurrence of previous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in patients who had previously undergone radiotherapy to doses ≥ 45 Gy to the area of recurrence, ≥ 6 months prior to enrollment, and who were medically unfit for surgery, deemed unresectable, or refused surgery. Patients were treated with radiation therapy every other day for five fractions at three dose levels; 30 Gy, 35 Gy, and 40 Gy. Cisplatin was given prior to every SBRT fraction at a dose of 15 mg/m2. Patients were monitored for safety and tolerability for any grade 4 or greater toxicity (per CTCAE v4.0) that occurred within 3 months from the start of SBRT. Primary end point was maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Results: Twenty patients were enrolled and of those 17 patients were evaluable for the primary endpoint. Nine patients had a primary tumor in the oropharynx, four patients in the oral cavity, three in the neck, one in the larynx, and one simultaneously in the larynx and neck. Of the three patients that were not evaluable two withdrew consent, and one patient in the 30 Gy dose level died of unknown causes two weeks following completion of treatment. Due to safety concerns the 30 Gy dose level was expanded an additional three patients, and no further dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed. At the 35 Gy and 40 Gy dose level there were no reported grade 4 or 5 adverse events (per CTCAE v4.0). There were 5 (27%) reported grade 3 toxicities and 12 (66%) grade 2 toxicities. Conclusions: This phase I study demonstrates that 40 Gy SBRT with concurrent cisplatin at a dose of 15mg/m2 is feasible, safe, and well tolerated. Patients continue to be followed for secondary outcomes of local control and overall survival. Clinical trial information: NCT02158234 .


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Enis Tinjak ◽  
Velda Smajlbegović ◽  
Adnan Beganović ◽  
Mirjana Ristanić ◽  
Halil Ćorović ◽  
...  

Introduction: Radiation therapy has long played an integral role in the manage¬ment of locally advanced head and neck cancer (HNC), both for organ preservation and to improve tumor control in the postoperative setting. The aim of this research is to investigate the effects of adaptive radiotherapy on dosimetric, clinical, and toxicity outcomes for patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiation therapy treatment. Many sources have reported volume reductions in the primary target, nodal volumes, and parotid glands over treatment, which may result in unintended dosimetric changes affecting the side effect profile and even efficacy of the treatment. Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) is an interesting treatment paradigm that has been developed to directly adjust to these changes.Material and methods: This research contains the results of 15 studies, including clinical trials, randomized prospective and retrospective studies. The researches analyze the impact of radiation therapy on changes in tumor volume and the relationship with planned radiation dose delivery, as well as the possibility of using adaptive radiotherapy in response to identified changes. Also, medical articles and abstracts that are closely related to the title of adaptive radiotherapy were researched.Results: The application of ART significantly improved the quality of life of patients with head and neck cancer, as well as two-year locoregional control of the disease. The average time to apply ART is the middle of the treatment course approximately 17 to 20 fractions of the treatment.Conclusion: Based on systematic review of the literature, evidence based changes in target volumes and dose reduction at OAR, adaptive radiotherapy is recommended treatment for most of the patients with head and neck cancer with the support of image-guided radiotherapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document