Produksi Dan Kualitas Jerami Padi Sumber Hijauan Pakan Dengan Waktu Panen Dan Dosis Pupuk Berbeda

This study was aimed to analyze the fertilizer dosage and harvest age in Ciherang rice varieties to increase the rice straw production and quality. This study used a block randomized design with 3 x 4 blocks divided based on harvest age H1 = 114 days, H2 = 118 days and H3 = 122 days. The treatment was fertilizer dose level which consists of 4 levels, namely: P0 (control) = Urea 55 g+SP-36 5 g+KCl 6 g, P1= Urea 63,25 g+SP-36 5 g+KCl 6 g, P2= Urea 71,50 g+SP-36 5 g+KCl 6 g dan P3= Urea 79,75 g+SP-36 5 g+KCl 6 g. The variables observed were straw production, grain production, filled grain production, empty grain production, crude protein (CP), crude fiber (CF), Acid Detergent Fiber (ADF) and Neutral Detergent Fiber (NDF). Data were analyzed using analysis of variance followed by Duncan's Multiple Range Test. The results showed that P3 was significantly (p< 0.05) the highest among fertilizer dose level treatments on the straw production (27.63 tons ha-1), filled grain production (5.52 tons ha-1), and reduced empty grain (0.15 tons ha-1). The Quality of rice straw were CP 7.49%, CF 20.35%, ADF 55.03 %). While at harvest age, H1 was significantly (p< 0.05) the highest among harvest ages treatments on the variables of straw production 28.18%, empty grain production 0.21 tons ha-1) and NDF 69.11%. It can be concluded that the best fertilizer dosage was an addition of urea by 45% with harvesting age of 114 days. Key words: fertilizer, harvest age, production, quality, rice straw

Ameliorative potential of Crinum asiaticum Linn leaf extracts on Elevated blood glucose in Alloxan-induced Diabetic Rats

In the present investigation the glucose lowering potential of the leaf extracts of Crinum asiaticum were prepared using cold maceration technique in solvents of varying polarity. The extracts exhibited the presence of flavonoids, alkaloids, phenolics and tannins. The oral toxicity of the aqueous and ethanolic extracts was determined and these two extracts were used of evaluating the antidiabetic activity. Oral glucose tolerance test was performed and diabetes was induced using alloxan (150 mg/kg) in rats. Ethanolic and aqueous extracts at two dose levels (200 mg/kg and 400mg/kg) were used for evaluating glucose lowering capability. Both the aqueous and the ethanolic extracts were found to significantly reduce glucose levels with the aqueous extract at dose level 200 mg/kg being the most effective (50% reduction) whereas the ethanolic extract was able to reduce the blood glucose by around 35% at the same dose level.

The Acute Single and Mixture Toxicity of Paraquat Dichloride and Deltamethrin to Guppy (Poecilia reticulata)

Although herbicide and insecticide contamination of surface waters normally occurs in the form of mixtures, the toxicity interactions displayed by such mixtures have only rarely been characterized. This study evaluated the acute effects of single pesticides (paraquat dichloride and deltamethrin, tested in their commercial formulations Gramoxone 276 SL and Decis 25EC) and their equitoxic mixtures on the survival of adult male guppy fish (Poecilia reticulata). Mixture toxicity was evaluated against the reference models of Concentration Addition (CA) and Independent Action (IA). In the single treatments, the 72h LC10 and LC50 values were 1.5 and 6.0 mg a.s. L-1 and 0.53 and 3.6 µg a.s. L-1 for paraquat dichloride and deltamethrin, respectively. The equitoxic mixtures showed significant paraquat dichloride-deltamethrin antagonism, both based on the CA and the IA model, without significant dose-level dependent deviations.

Phase Ib/II trial of ibrutinib and nivolumab in patients with advanced refractory renal cell carcinoma1

Background: Although immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapy has improved the outcomes of many patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), most eventually develop disease progression. Newer agents that modulate immune response can possibly potentiate checkpoint inhibitor therapy. The ITK/ETK/BTK inhibitor ibrutinib has been reported to inhibit myeloid derived suppressor cells in preclinical models and to potentiate immunotherapy. We conducted an investigator-initiated trial of ibrutinib plus the PD1 inhibitor nivolumab in mRCC patients, particularly in those previously exposed to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Methods: Eligible patients had mRCC of any histologic subtype, completed at least one line of prior systemic therapy which could have included prior immunotherapy, and had acceptable end-organ function with ECOG performance status of 0–2. Treatment consisted of nivolumab 240 mg intravenously every 2 weeks plus ibrutinib 560 mg (dose level 0) or 420 mg (dose level -1) orally once daily. Cycle length was 28 days. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as any Grade 3 or higher adverse event (AE) attributable to therapy. After identification of the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), up to 19 patients were enrolled to an expansion cohort to further evaluate toxicities and any early evidence of efficacy. The primary endpoints of the trial were establishment of RP2D and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: A total of 31 patients were enrolled, 6 to dose level 0, 7 (of which one was not evaluable for DLT) in dose level -1, and 18 in the expansion cohort. Median age was 60 years (range, 36–90), most had clear cell histology (n = 27; 87%), and most had prior immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy (n = 28; 90%). Three patients experienced one DLT each, all in dose level 0 (all Grade 3), namely elevated lipase, hypoalbuminemia, and nausea. No DLTs were seen in dose level –1 which was declared the RP2D. The most common Grade 3 or higher AEs include anemia (n = 5), lymphocyte count decrease (4), nausea (2), and hypotension (2). Of 28 patients evaluable for response, one patient (3.6%) had a complete response, 2 (7.1%) had a partial response, and 11 (39.2%) had stable disease, for an objective response rate of 10.7%(95%CI: 3.7%–27.2%) and a disease control rate of 50%(95%CI: 32.6%–67.4%). All responders had received prior immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Median PFS was 2.5 months (95%CI, 1.9 –4.8) while median OS was 9.1 months (95%CI, 6.6 –19.0). Conclusions: Ibrutinib at a dose of 420 mg orally once daily in combination with nivolumab 240 mg IV every 2 weeks is feasible and tolerable in mRCC patients. No unique immune-related AEs were observed. Anti-tumor activity was seen in patients previously exposed to PD-1 targeted therapy.

A Pilot Study of CPX-351 (Vyxeos ©) for Transplant Eligible, Higher Risk Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Introduction: CPX-351 (Vyxeos ©; daunorubicin and cytarabine liposome for injection) is a dual-drug liposomal encapsulation of daunorubicin and cytarabine in a synergistic 1:5 molar drug ratio that is FDA approved for treatment of adults with newly diagnosed therapy-related AML or AML with myelodysplasia-related changes. Secondary AML is clinically and biologically similar to MDS, sharing many of the same genetic mutations. We hypothesize that CPX-351 therapy may result in deeper responses than traditional therapy with hypomethylating agents, with acceptable tolerability, and translate into better outcomes in the MDS population. This is a multicenter, dose-escalation and safety expansion study (NCT03572764) to investigate induction and consolidation therapy with CPX-351 in a transplant eligible, higher risk MDS population. Methods: Two dose levels were investigated in the dose-escalation portion. Induction Dose Level 1: (daunorubicin 29 mg/m 2 and 65 mg/m 2 cytarabine) liposome on days 1, 3, 5; and Induction Dose Level 2: (daunorubicin 44 mg/m 2 and 100 mg/m 2 cytarabine) liposome on Days 1, 3, 5. The primary objectives were to evaluate safety and to determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D). DLTs were assessed during the induction period (up to day 56 to evaluate for prolonged myelosuppression). Additionally, a dose expansion (for up to 20 treated patients) was performed at the RP2D. After induction, patients could receive up to two cycles of consolidation per dose level: Dose Level 1, (daunorubicin 14.3 mg/m 2 and 32 mg/m 2 cytarabine) liposome on Days 1 and 3; or Dose Level 2 (daunorubicin 29 mg/m 2 and 65 mg/m 2 cytarabine) liposome on Days 1 and 3. After induction, the patient could proceed to alloHCT at any time at the discretion of the treating physician. Key eligibility criteria included MDS patients who were naïve to hypomethylating agents, aged 18-70 years, an IPSS-R score &gt; 3 (Intermediate, High or Very High Risk), ≥ 5% bone marrow myeloblasts, and suitable candidates for cytotoxic induction therapy and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT). Key secondary endpoints were day 30 and 60 post-induction mortality, the proportion of patients proceeding to alloHCT, and response assessments per IWG 2006 criteria. Results: As of abstract submission, 19 patients have been treated and dose escalation is complete. The dose escalation portion included 12 patients (Dose Level 1, n=6; Dose Level 2, n=6), and the safety expansion to date includes 7 patients treated at Dose Level 2. The median age was 64 years (range, 18-68), 67% were female, and the IPSS-R risk categories were as follows: intermediate (n=1, 5%), high (n=10, 53%) and very high (n=8, 42%). There were no DLTs in either Dose Level 1 or Dose Level 2, and Dose Level 2 was selected for safety expansion. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were evaluated in the 18 patients who had completed induction (Table). The most common TEAEs were hematologic, as expected. The most common non-hematologic TEAEs were febrile neutropenia (n=13, 72.2%), hypertension (n=9, 50%), and sepsis (n=5, 27.8%). SAEs included febrile neutropenia (n=5), sepsis (n=2), lower GI hemorrhage (n=2, two instances in the same patient), atrial fibrillation (n=1), pneumonitis (n=1), and catheter related infection (n=1). To date, the 30 and 60 day mortality is 0% and 5% (n=1), respectively, with the 1 death unrelated to therapy and due to progression of disease to AML. Of the 19 patients, 13 have received alloHCT with 4 still potentially alloHCT candidates. Of response evaluable pts (n=18, 1 pt pending response evaluation at data cutoff), the overall response rate was 78% with best overall responses of CR (n=4), mCR (n=10), stable disease (n=2), progressive disease (n=2) and pending (n=1). Of the 10 patients with mCR, 3 also had hematologic improvements. Conclusions: CPX-351 (daunorubicin 44 mg/m 2 and 100 mg/m 2 cytarabine) liposome on Days 1, 3, 5, has demonstrated a tolerable safety and promising efficacy profile when used in a transplant eligible, higher risk MDS population, warranting further study. Updated safety and efficacy outcomes will be presented at the meeting. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Jacoby: Abbvie: Research Funding; Jazz: Research Funding. Sallman: Shattuck Labs: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kite: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Intellia: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Magenta: Consultancy; Incyte: Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Syndax: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aprea: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Scott: Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Komrokji: AbbVie: Consultancy; Acceleron: Consultancy; Geron: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PharmaEssentia: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Taiho Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMSCelgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Uy: AbbVie: Consultancy; Macrogenics: Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Astellas: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: CPX-351 (Vyxeos©; daunorubicin and cytarabine liposome for injection) is FDA approved for treatment of adults with newly diagnosed therapy-related AML or AML with myelodysplasia-related changes

Vincristine Sulfate Liposome Injection (VSLI, Marqibo®) in Combination with UK ALL-R3 Induction Chemotherapy for Children, Adolescents and Young Adults with Relapsed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL): A Therapeutic Advances in Childhood Leukemia and Lymphoma (TACL) Consortium Trial

Introduction: Vincristine intensification has the potential to improve outcomes in ALL, but severe neurotoxicity has prohibited escalation beyond standard capped doses. Vincristine sulfate liposome injection, VSLI (Marqibo®) is a liposomal formulation of aqueous vincristine that optimizes pharmacokinetics, prolongs circulating half-life, increases tissue penetration, and may be better tolerated than standard vincristine. VSLI received accelerated FDA approval for adults with relapsed/refractory (r/r) ALL, at a dose of 2.25 mg/m 2/dose without a dose cap. A phase I trial of VSLI in children and young adults with r/r ALL demonstrated safety, tolerability, and evidence for single-agent activity (Shah NN, et al. Pediatric Blood Cancer, 2016). Studies of VSLI with combination chemotherapy in children have not been conducted. With emerging data supporting improved outcomes for patients (pts) with r/r ALL who proceed to immunotherapy with low-burden disease, identifying safe and effective reinduction regimens to reduce disease burden remains a priority. Methods: This multicenter pilot study conducted through the TACL consortium was designed to assess safety and feasibility of VSLI as replacement for standard vincristine with combination chemotherapy for individuals between the ages of 2-21 years with r/r ALL. Two dose levels of VSLI were utilized without a dose cap: Dose level 1 (DL1) 1.5 mg/m 2/dose; and Dose level 2 (DL2) 2.0 mg/m 2/dose. Treatment success was determined by both 1) the absence of a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) (as defined by any &gt; Grade 3 regimen related non-hematologic toxicity which precluded completion of the pre-specified treatment course or from proceeding to subsequent therapy within 7 weeks) and 2) completion of the prescribed treatment regimen. Adverse event grading was based on CTCAE v4.03. Bone marrow aspirate was used for standard morphologic assessment of response with central flow cytometric analysis for minimal residual disease (MRD) determination with a cut-off of &lt;0.01% of mononuclear cells considered as MRD negative. This analysis reports the toxicities and feasibilities for Cohort A which constituted the 4-drug UK ALL-R3 induction regimen consisting of VSLI, dexamethasone, mitoxantrone, and asparaginase (pegaspargase or Erwinia). Results: A total of 10 pts with r/r B-ALL, median age 13.4 (range 5.0-17.3 years) were treated on Cohort A. Pts were heavily pre-treated, with 3 having relapsed after prior allogeneic stem cell transplantation; 8 of 10 had an M3 marrow (&gt;/= 25% blasts). The first 4 pts were treated at DL1. All 4 were evaluable for toxicity and response and met the criteria for treatment success, facilitating dose escalation to DL2. At DL2, 4 pts were treated, with 2 experiencing DLT, including one grade (Gr) 5 event (Table 1). Two additional pts were subsequently treated at DL1 and achieved treatment success, confirming safety and feasibility of DL1 with a VSLI dose of 1.5 mg/m 2 in combination with UK ALL-R3 4-drug induction. Nine of 10 (90%) pts achieved a morphologic complete remission (CR), 5 of which were MRD negative. The median VSLI dose administered at DL1 was 2.3 mg (range, 1.8-3.2 mg) and at DL2 was 2.2 mg (range, 1.5-3.3 mg) demonstrating the feasibility of dosing beyond the standard vincristine dose-cap of 2 mg. Transient aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevations were seen in 8 pts, 6 of whom had a grade 1-2 toxicity. Gr 3 hepatic toxicities were seen in 3 pts: 1 each with ALT elevation and hyperbilirubinemia; ALT and AST elevation; gamma-glutamyl transferase elevation. Toxicities were generally consistent with the UK ALL-R3 regimen. Conclusions: In children with r/r ALL, the combination of UK ALL-R3 with VSLI was highly effective with an acceptable safety profile. DL1 (1.5 mg/m 2/dose) was found to be the maximum tolerated dose in combination with this intensive re-induction regimen. The trial continues to enroll at DL1 in the expansion phase to obtain additional safety and response data with this 4-drug regimen. Additionally, 2 cohorts have been added to gain further experience with VSLI in combination with 3-drug induction (Cohort B: UK ALL-R3 without mitoxantrone) and with ALL maintenance chemotherapy (Cohort C: dexamethasone, methotrexate, mercaptopurine). VSLI has potential as a vincristine dose-intensification strategy in combination with reinduction chemotherapy for r/r ALL in pediatric patients. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Hermiston: Novartis: Consultancy; Sobi: Consultancy. Whitlock: Amgen; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding; Sobi Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Silverman: Takeda, Servier, Syndax, Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wayne: Spectrum/Acrotech: Research Funding; KITE/Gilead: Research Funding.

Preliminary Safety and Efficacy of PBCAR0191, an Allogeneic 'Off-the-Shelf' CD19-Directed CAR-T for Patients with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) CD19+ B-ALL

Introduction: CD19-directed autologous CAR-T products induce high response rates in adults with R/R B-ALL, yet many patients relapse within the first year. Additionally, cell manufacturing timelines, and poor t-cell fitness may imperil efficacy, especially among those with proliferative disease. This makes access to a donor-derived, readily available CAR-T product of great interest in this patient population, particularly when consolidation with allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) is possible. We report preliminary safety, efficacy, and correlative data for the R/R B-ALL patients dosed with at least 3 x 10 6 CAR-T cells/kg of PBCAR0191, an allogeneic 'off-the-shelf' CD19-directed CAR-T. Methods: Subjects were 18 years or older with CD19+ R/R B-ALL after at least 2 prior lines of therapy. Patients were required to have adequate organ function and no active GvHD, CNS disease, active infections, or other active medical issues. Prior allo-SCT and/or autologous CAR-T therapy were allowed. Subjects received either standard (sLD; 30mg/m2/day and 500mg/m2/day x 3 days fludarabine and cyclophosphamide, respectively) or enhanced (eLD; 30mg/m2/day x 4 days flu and 1000mg/m2/day x 3 days cy) lymphodepletion preceding PBCAR0191 infusion. Correlative laboratory samples were taken for CAR-T expansion, persistence, molecular response to treatment and safety assessments. Results: As of August 2, 2021, 15 subjects with R/R CD19+ B-ALL have been dosed with dose Dose level 3/4a (3 X 10 6 CAR-T cells/kg or equivalent, n=11) or a Dose level 4b (flat dose of 5 X 10 8 CAR-T cells, n=4). Demographics, baseline disease, and prior treatment data are presented in the table. Most of the Adverse events (AE) reported to date were mild, with no cases of GvHD, no Grade ≥3 CRS and 1 case of Grade 3 ICANS which resolved within 48 hours. 67% of subjects treated (10/15) experienced PBCAR0191 related AEs, with 60% (9/15) of subjects experiencing serious AEs (one related to PBCAR0191, ICANS Grade 3). The complete response (CR) or CRi (incomplete marrow recovery) rate at Day ≥28 is 33% (2/6) in DL3/4a and sLD, 80% (4/5) in DL3/4a with eLD and 75% (3/4) in DL4b with sLD. Importantly, 4/15 (27%) responding subjects underwent allo-SCT, with one additional subject not able to receive transplant due to eligibility yet maintaining an MRD- CR for &gt;250 days, and one refusing to proceed with transplant. Product accessibility was evident compared to autologous CAR-T products, with median time from screening completion to PBCAR0191 infusion of 7 days (median of 1 day until start of LD) and all eligible subjects receiving PBCAR0191 infusion. Conclusion: PBCAR0191 has demonstrated a manageable safety profile and high complete response rate at day 28 or later, providing an adequate window for potential bridge to allo-SCT. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Jain: Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria, Research Funding; Precision Biosciences: Honoraria, Research Funding; Cellectis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Beigene: Honoraria; TG Therapeutics: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Aprea Therapeutics: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Fate Therapeutics: Research Funding; Servier: Honoraria, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Kantarjian: KAHR Medical Ltd: Honoraria; Ascentage: Research Funding; Immunogen: Research Funding; Jazz: Research Funding; Aptitude Health: Honoraria; Ipsen Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Precision Biosciences: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; NOVA Research: Honoraria; BMS: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Astellas Health: Honoraria; Taiho Pharmaceutical Canada: Honoraria. Sauter: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Consultancy; Kite/Gilead: Consultancy; Precision Biosciences: Consultancy; Genmab: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi-Genzyme: Consultancy, Research Funding. Heery: Precision BioSciences: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Ended employment in the past 24 months; Arcellx: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. List: Halia Therapeutics: Consultancy, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company; CTI Biosciences: Consultancy; Precision BioSciences: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Aileron Therapeutics: Consultancy. Johnson: Precision BioSciences, Inc: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Lou: Precision BioSciences: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Vainorius: Precision BioSciences: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Abbvie: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; United Therapeautics: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Olszewski: Genentech, Inc.: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; PrecisionBio: Research Funding; Celldex Therapeutics: Research Funding; Acrotech Pharma: Research Funding; Genmab: Research Funding. Stein: Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Stemline: Speakers Bureau. Shah: Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Expenses; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Expenses; Pfizer: Consultancy, Other: Expenses; Amgen: Consultancy; Precision Biosciences: Consultancy; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Expenses, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics/Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Expenses; Acrotech/Spectrum: Honoraria; BeiGene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Servier Genetics: Other. OffLabel Disclosure: PBCAR0191 is not FDA approved

Donor-Derived CAR T Cells Engineered with Sleeping Beauty in Pediatric and Adult Patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Relapsed Post-HSCT

Introduction Allogeneic Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T cells engineered with non-viral methods offer a modality to reduce costs and logistical complexity of the viral process and allow lymphodepleted patients to access CAR T cell treatment. We recently proposed the use of Sleeping Beauty (SB) transposon to engineer donor-derived T cells differentiated according to the cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cell protocol (Magnani CF et al. J Clin Invest. 2021). We report here outcomes on B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) patients, relapsing after transplantation, treated with donor-derived anti-CD19 CAR T cells (CARCIK-CD19). Methods We conducted an academic, multi-center, phase I/II dose-escalation trial in patients relapsed after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The infusion product was manufactured in-house starting from 50 mL of peripheral blood from the HSCT donor by electroporation with GMP-grade plasmids. All patients underwent lymphodepletion with Fludarabine (30 mg/m 2/day x 4 days) and Cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m 2/day x 2 days), before proceeding to CARCIK-CD19 infusion. We used the Bayesian Optimal Interval (BOIN) design to define a four-dose escalation scheme. Primary objectives were to define the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD), safety, and feasibility. Secondary objectives included the assessment of complete hematologic response (CR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free (PFS), event-free (EFS), and overall survival (OS). This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03389035. Results From January 2018 to June 2021, a total of 32 patients were screened, 26 enrolled (6 children and 20 adults) and 21 infused (4 children and 17 adults). Reasons for not receiving infusion included consent withdrawal (N=1), disease progression not controlled by bridging therapy (N=3), acquisition of myeloid phenotype (N=1). The median number of prior therapies was 4 (range, 1-7) with a median time interval from HSCT to relapse of 9 months. The median BM blasts was 60% (range, 5-100%) at enrollment and 7% (range, 0-96%) post lymphodepletion. Of the 21 patients infused, CARCIK-CD19 were obtained by HLA-identical sibling (n=6, 29%), matched unrelated (n= 7, 33%), and haploidentical donors (n=8, 38%). Three patients (14%) received the first dose level of 1x10 6 CARCIK-CD19 cells/Kg, three (14%) the second of 3x10 6, and three (14%) the third of 7.5x10 6 whereas 12 patients (57%) received the fourth and last planned dose level of 15x10 6 cells/Kg, as no dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed. CRS was observed in six patients (three grade I and three grade II) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity in two patients at the highest dose. Although 9 out of 21 had experienced acute or chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) after the previous HSCT, secondary GvHD was never induced by CARCIK-CD19. Complete response was achieved by 13 out of 21 patients (61.9%, 95%CI=38-82%) and by 11 out of 15 patients treated with the 2 highest doses (73.3%, 95%CI=45-92%). Eleven of these responders were MRD-negative. Notably, the type of donor did not influence the achievement of CR 28 days post-infusion. At a median follow up of 21.6 months (range, 1.0-38.4 months), 10 patients (47.6%) are alive in CR (9 in the 2 highest dose levels). Overall, the median OS and EFS were 9.7 and 3.2 months, respectively, with a median DOR of 4.0 months (range, 1.0-23.5 months). Patients in CR at 28-days had a 6-months relapse-free survival of 48.4% (SE=14.9). EFS at 6 months was 26.5% (SE=9.9) and OS was 67.6% (SE=11.1). Among the 13 patients who achieved CR, two children underwent consolidation with a second allo-HSCT in complete remission. Adult patients did not receive any additional anti-leukemic therapies unless a relapse occurred, and four of them remained in remission and alive (+24, +9, +6, and +4 months). Robust CARCIK-CD19 cell expansion was achieved in most patients and CARCIK-CD19 cells were measurable for up to 22 months. Conclusions SB-engineered CAR T cells induce sustained responses in B-ALL patients relapsed after HSCT irrespective of the donor type and without severe toxicities. Disclosures Lussana: Incyte: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Astellas Pharma: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Gritti: Takeda: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Kite Gilead: Consultancy; IQvia: Consultancy; Italfarmaco: Consultancy; Clinigen: Consultancy. Biondi: Incyte: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board; Bluebird: Other: Advisory Board; Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Colmmune: Honoraria.