Patterns of use of palliative radiotherapy fractionation for bone metastases and 30-day mortality

Author(s):  
V. Batumalai ◽  
J. Descallar ◽  
G.P. Delaney ◽  
G. Gabriel ◽  
K. Wong ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 119 ◽  
pp. S666-S667
Author(s):  
G. Torre ◽  
L. Caravatta ◽  
F. Deodato ◽  
J. Capuccini ◽  
A. Farioli ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 102 (2) ◽  
pp. 156-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tilman Bostel ◽  
Robert Förster ◽  
Ingmar Schlampp ◽  
Robert Wolf ◽  
Andre Franke Serras ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 430-434 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Haddad ◽  
R.K.S. Wong ◽  
G.R. Pond ◽  
F. Soban ◽  
D. Williams ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Fairchild ◽  
E. Pituskin ◽  
B. Rose ◽  
S. Ghosh ◽  
J. Dutka ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 61 (5) ◽  
pp. 1473-1481 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ewa Szumacher ◽  
Hillary Llewellyn-Thomas ◽  
Edmee Franssen ◽  
Edward Chow ◽  
Gerrit DeBoer ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 808-828
Author(s):  
Peter Hoskin

Radiotherapy has a major role in symptom control and over 40% of all radiation treatments are given with palliative intent. In the palliative setting, radiotherapy will usually be delivered using high-energy external beam treatment from a linear accelerator. Bone metastases may be treated with intravenous systemic radioisotopes and dysphagia with endoluminal brachytherapy. A general principle of palliative radiotherapy is that it should be delivered in as few treatment visits as possible and be associated with minimal acute toxicity. The main indications for palliative radiotherapy are in the management of symptoms due to local tumour growth and infiltration. These include pain from bone metastases, visceral pain from soft tissue metastases, and neuropathic pain from spinal, pelvic, and axillary tumour. Local pressure symptoms are particularly onerous and potentially dangerous when they affect the nervous system; thus, spinal canal compression remains one of the few true emergency situations in which radiotherapy is indicated. Similarly, brain, meningeal, or skull base metastases require urgent assessment and can be helped with local radiotherapy. Obstruction of a hollow tube or drainage channels can lead to significant symptoms and again local radiotherapy can be valuable in addressing this scenario. Such indications would include dysphagia, bronchial obstruction, leg or arm oedema, vena cava obstruction, or hydrocephalus. Finally, haemorrhage can be distressing if rarely life-threatening. Local radiotherapy to bleeding tumours in the lung, bronchus, bowel, genitourinary tract, and skin is very effective at control of bleeding.


Bone Cancer ◽  
2010 ◽  
pp. 295-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alysa Fairchild ◽  
Amanda Hird ◽  
Edward Chow

2019 ◽  
Vol 195 (12) ◽  
pp. 1074-1085 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tilman Bostel ◽  
Robert Förster ◽  
Ingmar Schlampp ◽  
Tanja Sprave ◽  
Sati Akbaba ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 111 (10) ◽  
pp. 1023-1032 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katie L Spencer ◽  
Joanne M van der Velden ◽  
Erin Wong ◽  
Enrica Seravalli ◽  
Arjun Sahgal ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) might improve pain and local control in patients with bone metastases compared to conventional radiotherapy, although an overall estimate of these outcomes is currently unknown. Methods A systematic review was carried out following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched to identify studies reporting pain response and local control among patients with bone metastases from solid-organ tumors who underwent SBRT in 1–6 fractions. All studies prior to April 15, 2017, were included. Study quality was assessed by predefined criteria, and pain response and local control rates were extracted. Results A total of 2619 studies were screened; 57 were included (reporting outcomes for 3995 patients) of which 38 reported pain response and 45 local control rates. Local control rates were high with pain response rates above those previously reported for conventional radiotherapy. Marked heterogeneity in study populations and delivered treatments were identified such that quantitative synthesis was not appropriate. Reported toxicity was limited. Of the pain response studies, 73.7% used a retrospective cohort design and only 10.5% used the international consensus endpoint definitions of pain response. The median survival within the included studies ranged from 8 to 30.4 months, suggesting a high risk of selection bias in the included observational studies. Conclusions This review demonstrates the potential benefit of SBRT over conventional palliative radiotherapy in improving pain due to bone metastases. Given the methodological limitations of the published literature, however, large randomized trials are now urgently required to better quantify this benefit.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document