scholarly journals Tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis using an Ilizarov fixator

2013 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-61
Author(s):  
Alessandro Marcondes Leite ◽  
Helder Mattos Menezes ◽  
Igor e Castro Aquino ◽  
Jefferson Soares Martins ◽  
Frederico Barra de Moraes
Author(s):  
Charlotte Reinke ◽  
Sebastian Lotzien ◽  
Emre Yilmaz ◽  
Yannik Hanusrichter ◽  
Christopher Ull ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Salvage of joint destruction of the tibiotalar and subtalar joint with necrosis or infection of the talus in compromised hosts is a challenging problem. In these cases, tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis using the Ilizarov external fixator represents a possible alternative to amputation. This retrospective study presents the results and complications of this salvage procedure. Materials and methods Between 2005 and 2015, 19 patients were treated with tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis using the Ilizarov external fixator. Ten patients received tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis due to an acute or chronic infection with joint destruction. The other nine patients presented posttraumatic necrosis of the talus or Charcot arthropathy. In addition to demographic data, the time spent in the fixator, the major and minor complications and the endpoint of the consolidation were evaluated retrospectively. Furthermore, clinical outcomes were measured using the modified American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score. Results The average time spent in the fixator was 22 (range 14–34) weeks. The average follow-up in 17 patients was 116 (range 4–542) weeks. Two patients were lost to follow-up. Complete osseous consolidation was achieved in 14 out of 19 patients. One patient presented partial consolidation, and in four patients, pseudarthrosis could be detected. The mean modified AOFAS score at the final follow-up was 53 out of 86 possible points. Conclusion Tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis using the Ilizarov fixator is a possible salvage procedure even in compromised hosts. However, the healing rates are below the rates reported in the literature for tibiotalar arthrodesis in comparable clinical situations.


2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 779-784 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mussa Wardak ◽  
Emal Wardak ◽  
Akshay Goel

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 433
Author(s):  
Priyajit Chattopadhyay ◽  
Paras Kumar Banka ◽  
Anindya Debnath ◽  
Sanjay Kumar

Background: Among the various techniques used for ankle arthrodesis, Ilizarov technique has various advantages along with the potential for treating complex and failed cases.Methods: Eleven cases were undertaken for ankle arthrodesis using the Ilizarov fixator. Two rings were applied along the tibia and one at the talus/calcaneum. The articular cartilage was denuded, and dynamic compression applied. The clinical, functional and radiological outcome were evaluated. The goal was a stable fusion with a well aligned foot.Results: The mean follow-up period was 95 weeks. Fusion was achieved in all cases with no major complication. Only one case had a residual deformity. The average time interval for the ankle fusion was 140.8±25.7 days. The postoperative modified American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Hindfoot score was 67.5±9.6 points.Conclusions: Ilizarov assisted ankle arthrodesis aids in early weight bearing, better alignment, and has good functional outcomes even in cases with previously failed procedures. It has the advantage of postoperative readjustment of the arthrodesis without the need of any second procedure with no major complications.


Author(s):  
Naveen Kumar S. ◽  
Anirudh C. Kulkarni ◽  
Arun K. Nayak ◽  
Roshan Kumar ◽  
Alvin Sajan ◽  
...  

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Complex foot deformities may occur as a result of trauma, poliomyelitis, osteomyelitis, burn contractures, neuromuscular diseases or may present as a resistant congenital contracture such as clubfoot. The Ilizarov fixator is new and more efficient method in the treatment of orthopedic foot problems. The aim of the study was to assess the outcome of Illizarov technique.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> This is a hospital record-based study conducted in 32 patients of foot deformity at orthopedic ward of Navodaya Medical college and Hospital, Raichur.  The record- based data was collected in January to July 2019. Data analysis done with SPSS 24.0 version IBM USA.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> Majority of the subjects were from 0 to 5 years age group i.e. 14 (43.8%). Mean age was 26.2±4.9 years. Majority in our study were males i.e. 71.9%. In majority of the cases, the cause of foot deformity was neglected and relapsed club foot i.e. 12 (37.5%). Treatment period was 22±7 weeks.   </p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> The Ilizarov method can successfully correct complex foot deformities. Success rate was 90.6%.</p>


1993 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 761
Author(s):  
Hae Ryong Song ◽  
Se Hyun Cho ◽  
Chong Suh Lee ◽  
Kyung Hoi Koo ◽  
Hyung Bin Park ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 158-160
Author(s):  
A. Merolli ◽  
R. De Vitis ◽  
P. Tranquilli Leali ◽  
F. Catalano
Keyword(s):  

2002 ◽  
Vol 91 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.-K. Pakarinen ◽  
H.-J. Laine ◽  
S. E. Honkonen ◽  
J. Peltonen ◽  
H. Oksala ◽  
...  

Background and Aims: The incidence of diabetic Charcot neuroarthropathy has increased. The purpose here was to study the current diagnostics and treatment of the Charcot foot. Materials and Methods: During a time period from 1994 to 2000, a total of 36 feet were diagnosed as cases of diabetic Charcot neuroarthropathies. A retrospective analysis of patient records and radiographs was undertaken. A review of the recent literature is presented. Results: 29 cases were diagnosed in the dissolution stage, 2 in coalascence, and 5 in the resolution stage. The diagnostic delay averaged 29 weeks. Treatment with cast immobilisation ranged from 4 to 37 weeks (mean 11 weeks). A total of 14 surgical procedures were carried out on 10 patients: six exostectomies, four midfoot arthrodeses, one triple arthrodesis, one tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis and two below-knee amputations. radiological fusion was achieved in two thirds of the attempted arthrodeses. Conclusions: A physician should always consider the Charcot neuroarthropathy when a diabetic patient has an inflamed foot. In the absence of fever, elevated CRP or ESR, infection is a highly unlikely diagnosis, and a Charcot process should primarily be considered. The initial treatment of an inflamed Charcot foot consists in sufficiently long non-weightbearing with a cast, which should start immediately after the diagnosis. The prerequisites of successful reconstructive surgery are correct timing, adequate fixation and a long postoperative non-weightbearing period. In the resolution stage most Charcot foot patients need custom-molded footwear.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document