Evaluating the Validity and Reliability of the Persian Version of American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Midfoot Scale

Background The use of a valid and reliable outcome scoring system is crucial for evaluating the result of different treatment interventions. The aims of this study were to translate and culturally adapt the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) midfoot scoring system into the Persian language and assess its validity and reliability. Method In total, 57 patients with midfoot injuries were enrolled. Forward-backward translation and cultural adaptation methods were used to develop the Persian version of AOFAS midfoot scoring system. Reliability and internal consistency were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cronbach’s alpha. The discriminant and convergent validities of the scoring system were assessed using the total score of the mental and physical component of SF-36. Results The mean age of the participants was 46.2 ± 16.3 years. The intra-observer reliability of the totals core of the Persian version of AOFAS midfoot scoring system was 0.96 (confidence interval [CI]: 0.92-0.97) and the inter-observer reliability of the scoring system was 0.90 (CI: 0.86-0.95). The Persian version of AOFAS midfoot scoring system had acceptable convergence with physical component scoring system of SF-36 and its subscales (0.57); moreover, it had acceptable discriminant validity with the mental component of SF-36 and its subscales (0.36). Conclusion The Persian version of AOFAS midfoot is a reliable and valid instrument and could be used by Persian language clinicians and researchers. Level of Clinical Evidence: 3

Ankle arthrodesis through Meary's anterolateral access

Objective: This study aimed to assess indications for surgical treatment, position of the ankle, time and rate of fusion after arthrodesis; to ascertain whether the technique provides fusion rates similar to those described in the published literature; and to quantify patients’ improvement according to the AOFA and VAS scores, and patients’ satisfaction using a Likert scale. Methods: This is a clinical study with a cohort of 18 patients (9 women and 9 men) with a mean age of 49.10 years, conducted from 2006 and 2016. Results: Post-traumatic arthrosis (88.88%), rheumatoid arthritis (5.56%), and Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (5.56%) motivated the surgeries. Six ankles fused in an equinus position, and 12 of them in a neutral position. Five ankles fused in valgus angulation, and 13 in a neutral position. Five ankles fused in external rotation, 2 in internal rotation and 11 in a neutral position. In the postoperative period, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores showed an improvement of 31.6 points and 5.1 points, respectively. Regarding the Likert scale, 2 patients reported being very satisfied, 14 satisfied, and 2 partially satisfied. Conclusion: Fusion in a 100% of cases and patients’ overall satisfaction have led to the conclusion that this treatment method is appropriate to attain ankle fusion, with results similar to those found in the medical literature. Level of Evidence IV; Therapeutic Studies; Case Series.

Metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis of the hallux using a minimally invasive technique

Objective: To evaluate the outcomes of the metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis (MTPA) of the hallux using a percutaneous technique. Methods: The MTPA of the hallux was performed in a total of 27 feet: 20 patients diagnosed with hallux rigidus and 7 with rheumatoid arthritis. The mean postoperative follow-up time was 30.7 months. The results were evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) forefoot score, and regards to union rate. Results: All 27 patients were operated percutaneously and noticed relief of the pain, with a mean increase of 50.9 points in AOFAS scores and a mean decrease of 7.4 points in the VAS. The mean union time was 10 weeks. There were no cases of nonunion. Conclusion: Percutaneous first MTP arthrodesis proved effective for treating hallux rigidus and degenerative rheumatic pathologies. Level of Evidence IV; Therapeutic Studies; Cases Series.

Do We Need Extensor Retinacular Enhancement on Broström Lateral Ankle Repair? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Aims This meta-analysis compared inferior extensor retinaculum (IER) enhancement in Broström-Gould procedure and anatomical Broström repair. We aim to evaluate functional ankle score (American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, Karlsson score), talar tilt, talar anterior translation, and complications between both groups. Methods A comprehensive systematic literature search was carried out using Wiley Library, Scopus, Pubmed, ScienceDirect, and EuropePMC databases from inception up until 19 December 2020. While the intervention was IER enhancement, the control was those without IER enhancement. The primary outcome was the functional ankle score (AOFAS and Karlsson score). The secondary outcomes were talar tilt, talar anterior translation, and other complications. Results There was a total of 298 patients from 7 studies included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. IER enhancement was associated with lower AOFAS (mean difference -1.115 [-2.197, -0.033], p=0.043; I2: 0%) during follow-up. Lower Karlsson score was observed in the IER enhancement group (mean difference -2.004 [-3.442, -0.567], p=0.006; I2: 3.71%) during follow-up. Talar tilt (mean difference -0.145 degree [-0.436, 0.146], p=0.329; I2: 0%) and anterior displacement (mean difference -0.109 mm [-0.096, 0.314], p=0.299; I2: 0%) in the two groups were similar on follow-up. The complications were similar in both groups (OR 0.87 [0.40, 1.89], p=0.719; I2: 0%). Meta-regression analysis indicates that the association between IER and AOFAS was not affected by age (p=0.927) and male gender (p=0.930). Conclusion This meta-analysis showed that ATFL repair with non-IER enhancement was non-inferior compared to those with IER enhancement.

Calcaneal lengthening using ipsilateral fibula autograft in the treatment of symptomatic pes valgus in adolescents

Background Evans calcaneal lengthening osteotomy is used to treat symptomatic flexible flatfoot when conservative treatment fails. Grafts such as autologous iliac bone grafts, allografts, and xenografts are implanted at the osteotomy site to lengthen the lateral column of the hindfoot. This study aimed to present the outcomes of an autologous mid-fibula bone graft used for calcaneal lengthening in symptomatic pes valgus in adolescents. Methods We retrospectively examined 23 ft of 13 adolescents who underwent surgery between July 2014 and January 2018. The radiological and clinical outcomes (American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot scale scores) were assessed during a mean follow-up of 49.7 (range, 30.9–73.4) months. The mean distance of the lengthening site was measured to evaluate graft sinking or collapse. The Goldberg scoring system was used to determine the degree of union at the donor and recipient sites. Results The calcaneal pitch and the anteroposterior and lateral talo-first metatarsal (Meary) angles showed significant correction, from 14.4 to 19.6 (p < 0.001), and from 14.5 to 4.6 (p < 0.001) and 13.5 to 8.5 (p < 0.001), respectively. The mean distance of the lengthening site showed no significant change (p = 0.203), suggesting no graft sinking or postoperative collapse. The lateral distal tibial angle showed no significant difference (p = 0.398), suggesting no postoperative ankle valgus changes. Healing of the recipient and donor sites occurred in 23 and 21 ft, respectively. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot scores improved significantly, from 68.0 to 98.5 (p < 0.001). Conclusions Evans calcaneal lengthening using an ipsilateral mid-fibula bone autograft resulted in significant improvement in clinical and radiological outcomes without ankle valgus deformity. Hence, it could be a treatment option for lateral column calcaneal lengthening in adolescents.

A comparative study of the clinical efficacy of supination-adduction type II ankle fracture surgery based on the medial pilon fracture concept versus the ankle fracture concept

Background A supination-adduction (SAD) ankle fracture is a special type of ankle fracture that results in collapse of the distal tibial articular surface; as such, orthopaedic surgeons require greater awareness of this type of fracture. The severity of this injury lies between that of an ordinary ankle fracture and a pilon fracture, and the treatment of such fractures based on the ankle fracture concept leads to extremely high rates of postoperative complications and a poor prognosis. In this retrospective study, we aimed to explore the treatment of SAD fractures based on the pilon fracture concept. Methods We retrospectively analysed the clinical data of 67 patients with Lauge-Hansen supination-adduction type II (SAD-II) ankle fractures, most of whom had a 44-A AO classification. Patients underwent surgical treatment at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from January 2009 to June 2019. The patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical concept employed: 43 patients were included in the ankle fracture surgical concept group, and 24 patients were included in the medial pilon fracture surgical concept group. The therapeutic effect was evaluated based on the Burwell-Charnley radiological reduction standard, the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score and postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score 1 year after surgery using regression with adjustment for confounding factors. Results All 67 patients were followed up. Twenty-four patients were treated according to the medial pilon fracture concept, and forty-three patients were treated according to the ankle fracture concept. The AOFAS score 1 year after surgery in the medial pilon group (89.83 ± 2.77) was higher than that in the ankle fracture group (83.63 ± 7.97) (p < 0.05). The VAS score 1 year after surgery in the medial pilon fracture group (1.17 ± 0.96) was significantly better than that in the ankle fracture group (2.28 ± 0.96) (p < 0.05). Conclusion Patients with Lauge-Hansen SAD-II ankle fractures treated based on the medial pilon fracture surgical concept had better postoperative outcomes than those treated based on the ankle fracture surgical concept. Level of evidence Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Artrodese tibiotalocalcaneana minimamente invasiva com haste intramedular retrógrada bloqueada – Relato de três casos

ResumoA osteoartrite do tornozelo (OAT) está associada a quadro álgico e limitação funcional variável, demandando tratamento clínico e eventual indicação cirúrgica quando as medidas conservadoras são inefetivas – a artrodese tem sido o procedimento de escolha, por reduzir a dor, restaurar o alinhamento articular e tornar o segmento estável, preservando a marcha. O presente estudo relata 3 casos (3 tornozelos) de pacientes do sexo masculino, com entre 49 e 63 anos de idade, portadores de OAT secundária, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale (AOFAS AHS, na sigla em inglês) pré-operatória de 27 a 39 pontos, tratados mediante artrodese tibiotalocalcaneana minimamente invasiva utilizando haste intramedular retrógrada bloqueada. A permanência hospitalar foi de 1 dia, e os pacientes foram autorizados para carga imediata com órteses removíveis para deambulação, conforme tolerado. O tratamento fisioterápico, introduzido desde o internamento, foi mantido, priorizando-se treino de marcha, ganho de força e propriocepção. Foi realizado acompanhamento clínico e radiográfico nas semanas 1, 2, 6, 12 e 24. Após evidências de consolidação (entre a 6ª e a 10ª semanas), as órteses foram retiradas. Um paciente queixou-se de dor no pós-operatório imediato e, ao final do 1° ano, apenas 1 paciente apresentou dor durante a reabilitação, resolvida completamente com analgésicos. Atualmente, os pacientes não apresentam queixas, retornando às atividades sem restrições – um deles, à prática de futebol e rapel. A AOFAS AHS pós-operatória foi de 68 a 86 pontos.

Minimally Invasive versus Open Repair for the Treatment of Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture in Adults: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

BACKGROUND The aim of this study is to compare open repair and minimally invasive repair in acute Achilles tendon rupture in adults regarding operative techniques, functional outcome and complications. DESIGN A prospective randomized controlled comparative trial. METHODS 40 consecutive cases with acute complete Achilles tendon rupture were divided randomly in 2 equal groups (20 treated by open Krackow repair and 20 treated by minimally invasive repair with the PARS device), average age 41 years, follow up time was average of 7 months. Patients were assessed clinically and functional scoring system of postoperative American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot score (AOFAS) was used postoperatively. RESULTS Our results found that there were no significant differences between both groups in rates of postoperative complications (MIS group 10%, open repair group 15; P = 0.134). PARS group had greater postoperative AOFAS score, early rehabilitation, better cosmetic appearance and smaller scar length than open Krackow repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture. CONCLUSIONS We have found out that minimally invasive techniques such as the PARS are clinically and biomechanically suitable alternatives to open repair based on both clinical outcomes and repair strength.