scholarly journals Controlling dynamic stall using vortex generators on a wind turbine airfoil

Author(s):  
D. De Tavernier ◽  
C. Ferreira ◽  
A. Viré ◽  
B. LeBlanc ◽  
S. Bernardy
Energies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 2535
Author(s):  
Chengyong Zhu ◽  
Tongguang Wang ◽  
Jie Chen ◽  
Wei Zhong

Passive vortex generators (VGs) have been widely applied on wind turbines to boost the aerodynamic performance. Although VGs can delay the onset of static stall, the effect of VGs on dynamic stall is still incompletely understood. Therefore, this paper aims at investigating the deep dynamic stall of NREL S809 airfoil controlled by single-row and double-row VGs. The URANS method with VGs fully resolved is used to simulate the unsteady airfoil flow. Firstly, both single-row and double-row VGs effectively suppress the flow separation and reduce the fluctuations in aerodynamic forces when the airfoil pitches up. The maximum lift coefficient is therefore increased beyond 40%, and the onset of deep dynamic stall is also delayed. This suggests that deep dynamic-stall behaviors can be properly controlled by VGs. Secondly, there is a great difference in aerodynamic performance between single-row and double-row VGs when the airfoil pitches down. Single-row VGs severely reduce the aerodynamic pitch damping by 64%, thereby undermining the torsional aeroelastic stability of airfoil. Double-row VGs quickly restore the decreased aerodynamic efficiency near the maximum angle of attack, and also significantly accelerate the flow reattachment. The second-row VGs can help the near-wall flow to withstand the adverse pressure gradient and then suppress the trailing-edge flow separation, particularly during the downstroke process. Generally, double-row VGs are better than single-row VGs concerning controlling deep dynamic stall. This work also gives a performance assessment of VGs in controlling the highly unsteady aerodynamic forces of a wind turbine airfoil.


Energies ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 654 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chengyong Zhu ◽  
Tongguang Wang ◽  
Jianghai Wu

Passive vortex generators (VGs) are widely used to suppress the flow separation of wind turbine blades, and hence, to improve rotor performance. VGs have been extensively investigated on stationary airfoils; however, their influence on unsteady airfoil flow remains unclear. Thus, we evaluated the unsteady aerodynamic responses of the DU-97-W300 airfoil with and without VGs undergoing pitch oscillations, which is a typical motion of the turbine unsteady operating conditions. The airfoil flow is simulated by numerically solving the unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations with fully resolved VGs. Numerical modelling is validated by good agreement between the calculated and experimental data with respect to the unsteady-uncontrolled flow under pitch oscillations, and the steady-controlled flow with VGs. The dynamic stall of the airfoil was found to be effectively suppressed by VGs. The lift hysteresis intensity is greatly decreased, i.e., by 72.7%, at moderate unsteadiness, and its sensitivity to the reduced frequency is favorably reduced. The influences of vane height and chordwise installation are investigated on the unsteady aerodynamic responses as well. In a no-stall flow regime, decreasing vane height and positioning VGs further downstream can lead to relatively high effectiveness. Compared with the baseline VG geometry, the smaller VGs can decrease the decay exponent of nondimensionalized peak vorticity by almost 0.02, and installation further downstream can increase the aerodynamic pitch damping by 0.0278. The obtained results are helpful to understand the dynamic stall control by means of conventional VGs and to develop more effective VG designs for both steady and unsteady wind turbine airfoil flow.


Energy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 189 ◽  
pp. 116272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chengyong Zhu ◽  
Jie Chen ◽  
Jianghai Wu ◽  
Tongguang Wang

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 1111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuang Li ◽  
Lei Zhang ◽  
Ke Yang ◽  
Jin Xu ◽  
Xue Li

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 063304
Author(s):  
Shuang Li ◽  
Lei Zhang ◽  
Jin Xu ◽  
Ke Yang ◽  
Juanjuan Song ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document