Dynamical accelerated performance measure approach for efficient reliability-based design optimization with highly nonlinear probabilistic constraints

2018 ◽  
Vol 178 ◽  
pp. 69-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Behrooz Keshtegar ◽  
Souvik Chakraborty
Keyword(s):  
Design Optimization ◽  
Performance Measure ◽  
Probabilistic Constraints ◽  
Reliability Based Design Optimization ◽  
Performance Measure Approach ◽  
Reliability Based Design ◽  
Highly Nonlinear

A New Study on Reliability-Based Design Optimization

1999 ◽  
Vol 121 (4) ◽  
pp. 557-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Tu ◽  
K. K. Choi ◽  
Y. H. Park
Keyword(s):  
Design Optimization ◽  
Reliability Index ◽  
Performance Measure ◽  
Probabilistic Constraints ◽  
Probabilistic Constraint ◽  
Reliability Based Design Optimization ◽  
Performance Measure Approach ◽  
Reliability Based Design ◽  
Index Approach ◽  
Special Cases

This paper presents a general approach for probabilistic constraint evaluation in the reliability-based design optimization (RBDO). Different perspectives of the general approach are consistent in prescribing the probabilistic constraint, where the conventional reliability index approach (RIA) and the proposed performance measure approach (PMA) are identified as two special cases. PMA is shown to be inherently robust and more efficient in evaluating inactive probabilistic constraints, while RIA is more efficient for violated probabilistic constraints. Moreover, RBDO often yields a higher rate of convergence by using PMA, while RIA yields singularity in some cases.

An Investigation of Nonlinearity of Reliability-Based Design Optimization Approaches

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyung K. Choi ◽  
Byeng D. Youn
Keyword(s):  
Design Optimization ◽  
Reliability Analysis ◽  
Probability Distributions ◽  
Performance Measure ◽  
Probabilistic Constraints ◽  
Random Parameters ◽  
Reliability Based Design Optimization ◽  
Reliability Based Design ◽  
Highly Nonlinear ◽  
Standard Normal

Deterministic optimum designs that are obtained without consideration of uncertainty could lead to unreliable designs, which call for a reliability approach to design optimization, using a Reliability-Based Design Optimization (RBDO) method. A typical RBDO process iteratively carries out a design optimization in an original random space (X-space) and reliability analysis in an independent and standard normal random space (U-space). This process requires numerous nonlinear mapping between X- and U-spaces for a various probability distributions. Therefore, the nonlinearity of RBDO problem will depend on the type of distribution of random parameters, since a transformation between X- and U-spaces introduces additional nonlinearity to reliability-based performance measures evaluated during the RBDO process. Evaluation of probabilistic constraints in RBDO can be carried out in two different ways: the Reliability Index Approach (RIA) and the Performance Measure Approach (PMA). Different reliability analysis approaches employed in RIA and PMA result in different behaviors of nonlinearity of RIA and PMA in the RBDO process. In this paper, it is shown that RIA becomes much more difficult to solve for non-normally distributed random parameters because of highly nonlinear transformations involved. However, PMA is rather independent of probability distributions because of little involvement of the nonlinear transformation.

An Investigation of Nonlinearity of Reliability-Based Design Optimization Approaches

2003 ◽  
Vol 126 (3) ◽  
pp. 403-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Byeng D. Youn ◽  
Kyung K. Choi
Keyword(s):  
Design Optimization ◽  
Reliability Analysis ◽  
Probability Distributions ◽  
Performance Measure ◽  
Probabilistic Constraints ◽  
Random Parameters ◽  
Reliability Based Design Optimization ◽  
Reliability Based Design ◽  
Highly Nonlinear ◽  
Standard Normal

Because deterministic optimum designs obtained without taking uncertainty into account could lead to unreliable designs, a reliability-based approach to design optimization is preferable using a Reliability-Based Design Optimization (RBDO) method. A typical RBDO process iteratively carries out a design optimization in an original random space (X-space) and a reliability analysis in an independent and standard normal random space (U-space). This process requires numerous nonlinear mappings between X- and U-spaces for various probability distributions. Therefore, the nonlinearity of the RBDO problem will depend on the type of distribution of random parameters, since a transformation between X- and U-spaces introduces additional nonlinearity into the reliability-based performance measures evaluated during the RBDO process. The evaluation of probabilistic constraints in RBDO can be carried out in two ways: using either the Reliability Index Approach (RIA), or the Performance Measure Approach (PMA). Different reliability analysis approaches employed in RIA and PMA result in different behaviors of nonlinearity for RIA and PMA in the RBDO process. In this paper, it is shown that RIA becomes much more difficult to solve for non-normally distributed random parameters because of the highly nonlinear transformations that are involved. However, PMA is rather independent of probability distributions because it only has a small involvement with a nonlinear transformation.

Sensitivity Analyses of FORM-Based and DRM-Based Performance Measure Approach for Reliability-Based Design Optimization

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ikjin Lee ◽  
Kyung K. Choi ◽  
Liu Du ◽  
David Gorsich
Keyword(s):  
Design Optimization ◽  
Performance Measure ◽  
Second Order ◽  
Probabilistic Constraints ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Probabilistic Constraint ◽  
Reliability Based Design Optimization ◽  
Performance Measure Approach ◽  
Reliability Based Design ◽  
Reliability Method

In a gradient-based design optimization, it is necessary to know sensitivities of the constraint with respect to the design variables. In a reliability-based design optimization (RBDO), the constraint is evaluated at the most probable point (MPP) and called the probabilistic constraint, thus it requires the sensitivities of the probabilistic constraints at MPP. This paper presents the rigorous analytic derivation of the sensitivities of the probabilistic constraint at MPP for both First Order Reliability Method (FORM)-based Performance Measure Approach (PMA) and Dimension Reduction Method (DRM)-based PMA. Numerical examples are used to demonstrate that the analytic sensitivities agree very well with the sensitivities obtained from the finite difference method (FDM). However, since the sensitivity calculation at the true DRM-based MPP requires the second-order derivatives and additional MPP search, the sensitivity derivation at the approximated DRM-based MPP, which does not require the second-order derivatives and additional MPP search to find the DRM-based MPP, is proposed in this paper. A convergence study illustrates that the sensitivity at the approximated DRM-based MPP converges to the sensitivity at the true DRM-based MPP as the design approaches the optimum design. Hence, the sensitivity at the approximated DRM-based MPP is proposed to be used for the DRM-based RBDO to enhance the efficiency of the optimization.

Optimization of Jacket Type Offshore-Tower Under Uncertainties

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Togan ◽  
H. Karadeniz ◽  
A. T. Daloglu
Keyword(s):  
Performance Measure ◽  
Environmental Data ◽  
Probabilistic Constraints ◽  
Reliability Based Design Optimization ◽  
Performance Measure Approach ◽  
Reliability Based Design ◽  
Economical Design ◽  
Design Variables ◽  
Index Approach ◽  
And Performance

In this work, economical design implementation of a jacket tower, which is subjected to some uncertainties associated with the loads, the material properties, and environmental data etc., is presented. In order to fulfill the defined task, reliability based design optimization (RBDO) concept combining the reliability analysis and optimization is performed with reliability constraints including stress, buckling, and the lowest natural frequency. The probabilistic constraints are evaluated by using Reliability Index Approach (RIA) and Performance Measure approach (PMA). The mass of the tower is considered as being the objective function; the thickness and diameter of the cross-section of the jacket members are taken as being design variables of the optimization.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document