A reprocessing for climate of sea surface temperature from the along-track scanning radiometers: A new retrieval scheme

2012 ◽  
Vol 116 ◽  
pp. 47-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Owen Embury ◽  
Christopher J. Merchant
2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (11) ◽  
pp. 2415-2433 ◽  
Author(s):  
Werenfrid Wimmer ◽  
Ian S. Robinson

AbstractMeasurements of sea surface temperature at the skin interface () made by an Infrared Sea Surface Temperature Autonomous Radiometer (ISAR) have been used for a number of years to validate satellite sea surface temperature (SST), especially high-accuracy observations such as made by the Advanced Along-Track Scanning Radiometer (AATSR). The ISAR instrument accuracy for measuring is ±0.1 K (Donlon et al.), but to satisfy Quality Assurance Framework for Earth Observation (QA4EO) principles and metrological standards (Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology), an uncertainty model is required. To develop the ISAR uncertainty model, all sources of uncertainty in the instrument are analyzed and an uncertainty value is assigned to each component. Finally, the individual uncertainty components are propagated through the ISAR retrieval algorithm to estimate a total uncertainty for each measurement. The resulting ISAR uncertainty model applied to a 12-yr archive of measurements from the Bay of Biscay shows that 77.6% of the data are expected to be within ±0.1 K and a further 17.2% are within 0.2 K.


2008 ◽  
Vol 25 (7) ◽  
pp. 1197-1207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne G. O’Carroll ◽  
John R. Eyre ◽  
Roger W. Saunders

Abstract Using collocations of three different observation types of sea surface temperatures (SSTs) gives enough information to enable the standard deviation of error on each observation type to be derived. SSTs derived from the Advanced Along-Track Scanning Radiometer (AATSR) and Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer for Earth Observing System (EOS; AMSR-E) instruments are used, along with SST observations from buoys. Various assumptions are made within the error theory, including that the errors are not correlated, which should be the case for three independent data sources. An attempt is made to show that this assumption is valid and that the covariances between the different observations because of representativity error are negligible. Overall, the spatially averaged nighttime AATSR dual-view three-channel bulk SST observations for 2003 are shown to have a very small standard deviation of error of 0.16 K, whereas the buoy SSTs have an error of 0.23 K and the AMSR-E SST observations have an error of 0.42 K.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document