A critical review on second- and third-generation bioethanol production using microwaved-assisted heating (MAH) pretreatment

2021 ◽  
Vol 152 ◽  
pp. 111679
Author(s):  
Jherwin B. Ocreto ◽  
Wei-Hsin Chen ◽  
Aristotle T. Ubando ◽  
Young-Kwon Park ◽  
Amit Kumar Sharma ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 502-517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inn Shi Tan ◽  
Man Kee Lam ◽  
Henry Chee Yew Foo ◽  
Steven Lim ◽  
Keat Teong Lee

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Carolina Rodrigues Teixeira ◽  
José Ricardo Sodré ◽  
Lilian Lefol Nani Guarieiro ◽  
Erika Durão Vieira ◽  
Fabiano Ferreira de Medeiros ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristel M. Gatdula ◽  
Rex B. Demafelis ◽  
Butch G. Bataller

To pursue the continuous implementation of the bioethanol blending mandate by the Philippine Biofuels Law, part of the roadmap of the National Biofuels Board (NBB) through the Department of Energy (DOE) is to find a sustainable feedstock. This is due to the deficit in locally produced bioethanol as there is an insufficient supply of currently used feedstock, sugarcane. There are several biomasses available in the country with components viable for ethanol fermentation. Aside from sugarcane, these include sweet sorghum and cassava (first-generation), rice straw and corn stover (second-generation), and macroalgae (third-generation). Among which, sweet sorghum can be considered as the best complementary feedstock to sugarcane as its syrup can be directly fermented to produce bioethanol. Considering its maximum bioethanol potential yield of 100 L/ton for two croppings annually, a comparably low production cost of PhP 36.00/L bioethanol was estimated, competitive enough with the PhP33.43/L bioethanol from sugarcane. Aside from finding a promising feedstock, the bioethanol production volume in the country must be increased to meet the demand through either working on the optimum processing conditions to increase the capacity utilization from the current 77.9% or through installation of additional distilleries.


2018 ◽  
Vol 68 ◽  
pp. 03018
Author(s):  
Hermansyah ◽  
Rona Ayu Sakinah ◽  
Julinar ◽  
Zazili Hanafiah ◽  
Hilda Zulkifli

The third generation of bioethanol production, bioethanol converted from biomass of microalgae. Our reserach aimed to produce bioethanol from substrate microalgae Oscillatoria sp. as substrate has been conducted. Oscillatoria sp. cultured in two media namely Bold Basal and Blue Green 11. microalgae Oscillatoria sp. were cultivated in Bold Basal and Blue Green 11 media hydrolyzed substrate, 0.143 mL/g and 0.496 mL/g, respectively. Unhyrolysate microalgae generated 0.018 mL/g and 3.59 mL/g of reduced sugar, respectively. Biomass obtained from Blue Green 11 media and Bold Basal media were 0.676 g and 0.482 g, respectively. Based on HPLC analysis, Oscillatoria sp. biomass contained maltose. Biomass were hydrolyzed by autoclaving in 121°C for 15 minutes. Bioethanol production was conducted by fermentation process using Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a microbial agent which applied in hydrolysate and non-hydrolysate of microalgae. Ethanol generated from fermentation was analyzed using gas chromatography. Based on gass chromatography data resulted that hydrolysate of microalgae biomass cultivated in Bold Basal medium and in Blue Green 11 medium produced 7% and 23% ethanol, respectively.


2021 ◽  
Vol 228 ◽  
pp. 113655 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashwin Jacob ◽  
B. Ashok ◽  
Avinash Alagumalai ◽  
Ong Hwai Chyuan ◽  
Phung Thi Kim Le

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document