scholarly journals The Role of Temporal Integration Windows in Visual Perception

2014 ◽  
Vol 126 ◽  
pp. 92-93
Author(s):  
David Melcher ◽  
Andreas Wutz ◽  
Jan Drewes ◽  
Scott Fairhall
1981 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. 565-567 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jules C. Abrams

The role of visual problems in learning disability has been a source of considerable controversy for many years. One major issue in the continuing argument is the frequent confusion of labels and concepts in the visual field. It is important to view vision as a psychophysiologic mechanism and to differentiate it from a mechanistic orientation emphasizing the eyes. Most visual problems related to learning disability represent a breakdown in the ability of the eyes to function in an harmonious fashion, that is, some interference in binocular function. While visual defects should not be confused with defects in visual perception, the identification and treatment of visual problems is an important element in the diagnosis and remediation of learning disabilities.


1990 ◽  
Vol 161 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 95-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
EIICHI IWAI ◽  
MASAO YUKIE ◽  
JOJI WATANABE ◽  
KAZUO HIKOSAKA ◽  
HIDEO SUYAMA ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 1960 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel P. Eckstein ◽  
James S. Whiting ◽  
James P. Thomas

2012 ◽  
Vol 25 (0) ◽  
pp. 188
Author(s):  
Helena Sgouramani ◽  
Chris Muller ◽  
Leon van Noorden ◽  
Marc Leman ◽  
Argiro Vatakis

We report two experiments aiming to define how experience and stimulus enactment affect multisensory temporal integration for ecologically-valid stimuli. In both experiments, a number of different dance steps were used as audiovisual displays at a range of stimulus onset asynchronies using the method of constant stimuli. Participants were either professional dancers or non-dancers. In Experiment 1, using a simultaneity judgment (SJ) task, we aimed at defining — for the first time — the temporal window of integration (TWI) for dancers and non-dancers and the role of experience in SJ performance. Preliminary results showed that dancers had smaller TWI in comparison to non-dancers for all stimuli tested, with higher complexity (participant rated) dance steps requiring larger auditory leads for both participant groups. In Experiment 2, we adapted a more embodied point of view by examining how enactment of the stimulus modulates the TWIs. Participants were presented with simple audiovisual dance steps that could be synchronous or asynchronous and were asked to synchronize with the audiovisual display by actually performing the step indicated. A motion capture system recorded their performance at a millisecond level of accuracy. Based on the optimal integration hypothesis, we are currently looking at the data in terms of which modality will be dominant, considering that dance is a spatially (visual) and temporally (audio) coordinated action. Any corrective adjustments, accelerations–decelerations, hesitations will be interpreted as indicators of the perception of ambiguity in comparison to their performance at the synchronous condition, thus, for the first time, an implicit SJ response will be measured.


2010 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 677-677
Author(s):  
J. Hegde ◽  
S. K. Thompson ◽  
D. Kersten

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document