Comparative energy and carbon footprint analysis of biosolids management strategies in water resource recovery facilities

2019 ◽  
Vol 665 ◽  
pp. 762-773 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gang Zhao ◽  
Manel Garrido-Baserba ◽  
Samuel Reifsnyder ◽  
Jing-Cheng Xu ◽  
Diego Rosso
Keyword(s):  
Water Resource ◽  
Carbon Footprint ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Resource Recovery ◽  
Footprint Analysis

Fundamental Improvements to Anaerobic Digestion Systems at Water Resource Recovery Facilities

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 (4) ◽  
pp. 353-365
Author(s):  
David Parry ◽  
Cameron Clark ◽  
Corey Kliebert ◽  
Paul Steele
Keyword(s):  
Anaerobic Digestion ◽  
Water Resource ◽  
Resource Recovery

Building an integrated AI and mathmatical modeling framework for online supervision and control of water resource recovery facilities

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 (10) ◽  
pp. 4025-4028
Author(s):  
Jose Porro ◽  
Chaïm De Mulder ◽  
Youri Amerlinck ◽  
Elena Torfs ◽  
Sophie Balemans ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Resource ◽  
Resource Recovery ◽  
Modeling Framework ◽  
Online Supervision ◽  
And Control

scholarly journals From wastewater treatment to water resource recovery: Environmental and economic impacts of full-scale implementation

2021 ◽  
pp. 117554
Author(s):  
Maria Faragò ◽  
Anders Damgaard ◽  
Jeanette Agertved Madsen ◽  
Jacob Kragh Andersen ◽  
Dines Thornberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Wastewater Treatment ◽  
Water Resource ◽  
Economic Impacts ◽  
Resource Recovery ◽  
Full Scale

Plant-wide investigation of sulfur flows in a water resource recovery facility (WRRF)

2021 ◽  
pp. 149530
Author(s):  
F. Forouzanmehr ◽  
Q.H. Le ◽  
K. Solon ◽  
V. Maisonnave ◽  
O. Daniel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Resource ◽  
Resource Recovery

Structuring the water quality policy problem: Applying Q-methodology to explore perspectives in hydrology, government, and community

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Schuyler Houser ◽  
Reza Pramana ◽  
Maurits Ertsen
Keyword(s):  
Water Quality ◽  
Water Resource ◽  
Q Methodology ◽  
Knowledge Integration ◽  
Water Quality Management ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Problem Structuring ◽  
Policy Problem ◽  
Resource Governance ◽  
Starting Point

<p>Recognizing the interrelatedness of water management and conceptual value of IWRM, many water resource governance systems are shifting from hierarchical arrangements towards more collaborative and participative networks. Increasing calls for participation recognize the value of drawing on social, political-administrative, and other kinds of knowledge in addition to technical water expertise. Participatory mandates, coordination bodies, and science-policy networks have emerged to facilitate knowledge integration, promote adaptive capacity, and align organizations in poly-centric systems.</p><p>Since the maintenance and effectiveness of such arrangements are contingent on trust and alignment rather than command and control, and since diverse stakeholders are engaged to co-produce knowledge, collaborators must grapple with identifying shared goals, developing knowledge management strategies to organize inputs, and attaining early progress to promote ongoing cooperation. But guidance is limited with respect to how such integrative aims are to be accomplished.</p><p>This research explores how systematic (but not necessarily convergent) problem structuring can support the forming, reordering, and cohering of water resource networks, especially when a complex issue – in this case, water quality management – rises to prominence on the policy agenda. In the early stages of a water quality project in the Brantas River Basin, Indonesia, stakeholder discussions suggested divergent conceptualizations of water quality and ideas about what conditions ‘matter’. Thus, instead of taking hydrological data as the starting point, this research first asks: What Brantas River(s) are we talking about, and why? Q-methodology is used to identify alternative perspectives on water quality held by a diverse set of stakeholders, including hydrologists. The analysis explores which aspects of the policy problem are consistent, which are contested, and whether problems indicated by hydrological science overlap, conflict, or cohere with those perceived by other stakeholders.</p><p>The research posits that, if scientists, engineers, decision-makers, community leaders, and other participants can appreciate areas of convergence and divergence regarding the water quality problem itself, they can lay groundwork for knowledge co-production; recognize opportunities for cooperation; better locate science in the problem space; and identify potential early wins to secure commitment. The research also asks to what extent consensus in problem structuring is necessary, or whether it is sufficient to identify strategies that are acceptable to different ontological viewpoints.</p>

Carbon footprint analysis of modern and traditional tempeh production in Indonesia

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ary Mauliva Hada Putri ◽  
Joko Waluyo ◽  
Arief Ameir Rahman Setiawan
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Footprint ◽  
Footprint Analysis

scholarly journals Evalution of Carbon Footprint

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 282-285
Keyword(s):  
Co2 Emissions ◽  
Carbon Footprint ◽  
Raw Materials ◽  
Action Plan ◽  
Ghg Emissions ◽  
Level Data ◽  
Footprint Analysis ◽  
The One ◽  
Carbon Dioxide Co2 ◽  
Building Operation

Due to manufactured technology enchantment the living being has much convenience and luxury. Though, at the same time, our current existence is doing damage to the environment. Like water pollution, air pollution and Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions on so forth. But CO2 emissions are the one of the major reason polluting the environment. Furthermost of what we utilise in our daily life lead to emitting CO2 into the environment. Due to this it leads to global warming and climate change problems. Therefore, carbon auditing (Carbon Footprint Analysis) is the first essential step to review the use of energy, to improve energy conservation and to allow building to go green. For this reason we need carbon audit to reduce usage raw materials, waste generation so on so forth to minimise GHG emissions .“CARBON AUDIT” is conducted within the building’s boundary which includes the following stages:- People Survey to gather employee-level data, Building Survey to gather building-operation data, Carbon Footprint Analysis to evaluate the greenhouse gas (GHG) emission and Final Carbon Audit Report to provide tailored recommendations for going green along with action plan to get started

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document