Renal Disease in Recipients of Nonrenal Solid Organ Transplantation

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 498-507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akinlolu O. Ojo
2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 310-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarat Kuppachi ◽  
Deepkamal Kaur ◽  
Danniele G. Holanda ◽  
Christie P. Thomas

2010 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Perl ◽  
Joanne M. Bargman ◽  
Sarbjit V. Jassal

The incidence of end-stage renal disease following nonrenal solid organ transplantation (NRSOT) is increasing and is associated with a poor prognosis. The etiology of end-stage renal disease is multifactorial, with calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) nephrotoxicity being primarily responsible. The impact of dialysis modality on the survival of these patients remains unclear. Peritoneal dialysis appears to be a feasible and safe option for renal replacement therapy in NRSOT patients. Concerns that NRSOT patients are at a higher risk of infectious and noninfectious complications necessitate practical considerations when prescribing and planning for peritoneal dialysis in these patients. While nephrotoxicity is a well-recognized complication of long-term CNI use, “peritoneotoxic” effects with significant alterations in peritoneal membrane structure and function have recently been described. Further study including the role of CNI-free immunotherapy protocols to optimize the outcomes of NRSOT recipients is needed.


2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 445-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer L. Lee ◽  
Cyd K. Eaton ◽  
Kristin Loiselle Rich ◽  
Bonney Reed-Knight ◽  
Rochelle S. Liverman ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (35) ◽  
pp. 5957-5963 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. P. Alexopoulos ◽  
L. Lindberg ◽  
R. K. Subramanyan ◽  
L. Matsuoka

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (28) ◽  
pp. 3497-3506
Author(s):  
Raymund R. Razonable

Cytomegalovirus is the classic opportunistic infection after solid organ transplantation. This review will discuss updates and future directions in the diagnosis, prevention and treatment of CMV infection in solid organ transplant recipients. Antiviral prophylaxis and pre-emptive therapy are the mainstays of CMV prevention, but they should not be mutually exclusive and each strategy should be considered depending on a specific situation. The lack of a widely applicable viral load threshold for diagnosis and preemptive therapy is emphasized as a major factor that should pave the way for an individualized approach to prevention. Valganciclovir and intravenous ganciclovir remain as drugs of choice for CMV management, and strategies for managing drug-resistant CMV infection are enumerated. There is increasing use of CMV-specific cell-mediated immune assays to stratify the risk of CMV infection after solid organ transplantation, and their potential role in optimizing CMV prevention and treatment efforts is discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document