233. Does postoperative physical therapy improve patient-reported outcomes at one-year following cervical spine surgery?

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (9) ◽  
pp. S114-S115
Author(s):  
Kristin R. Archer ◽  
Jacquelyn S. Pennings ◽  
Inamullah Khan ◽  
Ahilan Sivaganesan ◽  
JP Wanner ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (9) ◽  
pp. S208
Author(s):  
Jose H. Jimenez-Almonte ◽  
Ifeanyi N. Nzegwu ◽  
Boshen Liu ◽  
Jonathan D. Grabau ◽  
Zeeshan Akhtar ◽  
...  

Spine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (22) ◽  
pp. 1541-1552
Author(s):  
Kristin R. Archer ◽  
Mohamad Bydon ◽  
Inamullah Khan ◽  
Hui Nian ◽  
Jacquelyn S. Pennings ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marjorie C. Wang ◽  
Andrew M. Lozen ◽  
Purushottam W. Laud ◽  
Ann B. Nattinger ◽  
Erin E. Krebs

OBJECTIVEOpioids are commonly prescribed after surgery for painful spinal conditions, yet little is known about postoperative opioid use. The relationship between chronic opioid use and patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction with surgery is also unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate factors associated with opioid use 1 year after elective cervical spine surgery for degenerative conditions causing radiculopathy and myelopathy. The authors hypothesized that patients with preoperative opioid use would be more likely to report postoperative opioid use at 1 year, and that postoperative opioid use would be associated with patient-reported outcomes and dissatisfaction with surgery.METHODSThe authors performed a retrospective study of a prospective cohort of adult patients who underwent elective cervical spine surgery for degenerative changes causing radiculopathy or myelopathy. Patients were prospectively and consecutively enrolled from a single academic center after the decision for surgery had been made. Postoperative in-hospital pain management was conducted using a standardized protocol. The primary outcome was any opioid use 1 year after surgery. Secondary outcomes were the Neck Disability Index (NDI); 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) physical function (PF), bodily pain (BP), and mental component summary (MCS) scores; the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score among myelopathy patients; and patient expectations surveys. Patients with and without preoperative opioid use were compared using the chi-square and Student t-tests, and multiple logistic regression was used to study the associations between patient and surgical characteristics and postoperative opioid use 1 year after surgery.RESULTSTwo hundred eleven patients were prospectively and consecutively enrolled, of whom 39 were lost to follow-up for the primary outcome; 43.6% reported preoperative opioid use. Preoperative NDI and SF-36 PF and BP scores were significantly worse in the preoperative opioid cohort. More than 94% of both cohorts rated expectations of pain relief as extremely or somewhat important. At 1 year after surgery, 50.7% of the preoperative-opioid-use cohort reported ongoing opioid use, and 17.5% of patients in the no-preoperative-opioid-use cohort reported ongoing opioid use. Despite this, both cohorts reported similar improvements in NDI as well as SF-36 PF, BP, and MCS scores. More than 70% of both cohorts also reported being extremely or somewhat satisfied with pain relief after surgery. Predictors of 1-year opioid use included preoperative opioid use, duration of symptoms for more than 9 months before surgery, tobacco use, and higher comorbidity index.CONCLUSIONSOne year after elective cervical spine surgery, patients with preoperative opioid use were significantly more likely to report ongoing opioid use. However, patients in both groups reported similar improvements in patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction with pain relief. Interventions targeted at decreasing opioid use may need to focus on patient factors such as preoperative opioid use or duration of symptoms before surgery.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. S67
Author(s):  
Blaine Manning ◽  
Michaela Thomson ◽  
Haley Huff ◽  
Suryanshi Rawat ◽  
Shelby Harris ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
pp. S145-S146
Author(s):  
Javier Guzman ◽  
Holt Cutler ◽  
Motasem Al Maaieh ◽  
James Connolly ◽  
Branko Skovrlj ◽  
...  

Neurosurgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 66 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Inamullah Khan ◽  
Jacquelyn S Pennings ◽  
Claudia Davidson ◽  
Mohamad Bydon ◽  
Anthony L Asher ◽  
...  

Abstract INTRODUCTION Patient Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMs) have become a vital tool for evaluating success of spine surgery. The purpose was to examine the validity of the PROMIS-29 to better understand it's use for cervical spine surgery patients. A secondary objective was to calculate a conversion equation between PROMIS-29 and NDI, to allow researchers and clinicians to determine a predicted NDI. METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected national registry data, the Quality Outcomes Database (QOD), which is designed to evaluate risk-adjusted outcomes for the most commonly performed spinal surgical procedures. We queried the QOD registry for patients with PROMIS-29 and NDI responses. Of 619 patients, 41% were female, 87% Caucasian, and 13% had revision surgery. The mean age was 58 yr (SD = 12). Validity of the PROMIS-29 was assessed using Cronbach's a, ceiling/floor effects, and principle axis factoring. Multivariable regression predicting NDI scores from PROMIS-29 domains used data from all three timepoints. Predicted NDI scores, derived from PROMIS-29 domains, were plotted against NDI scores to determine how well PROMIS-29 domains predicted NDI. A conversion equation was created from PROMIS regression coefficients. RESULTS Results showed good reliability (Cronbach's a >0.80) and validity of PROMIS-29 in patients undergoing cervical surgery: convergent (r > 0.65) and discriminant (r = 0.49-0.63) validity, low/high floor/ceiling effects (=2%), and unidimensional domains (factor loading >0.64). The conversion equation used 6 PROMIS-29 domains (NDIpercent = 7.928-0.527*[PFraw] + 1.570*[PAINraw] +0.995*[SDraw] + 1.101[PIraw] + 0.392[Fatigueraw] 0.409 [SRraw]). Correlations between predicted and actual NDI scores at each timepoint were: r = 0.84 at baseline, r = 0.76 at 3 mo, and r = 0.84 at 12 mo, suggesting that the equation predicted NDI-scores that are strongly correlated with actual NDI-scores. CONCLUSION Good reliability and validity support the use of PROMIS-29 in cervical surgery patients. Findings suggest accurate NDI score can be derived from PROMIS-29 domains. These results support the idea that PROMIS-29 domains have the potential to replace disease-specific traditional PROMs like NDI.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document