P112. Cervical disc replacement for radiculopathy versus myeloradiculopathy: An MCID analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. S195
Author(s):  
Ram K. Alluri ◽  
Avani S. Vaishnav ◽  
Ahilan Sivaganesan ◽  
Dimitra Melissaridou ◽  
Ryan Lee ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 727-733
Author(s):  
Jasmine A. T. DiCesare ◽  
Alexander M. Tucker ◽  
Irene Say ◽  
Kunal Patel ◽  
Todd H. Lanman ◽  
...  

Cervical spondylosis is one of the most commonly treated conditions in neurosurgery. Increasingly, cervical disc replacement (CDR) has become an alternative to traditional arthrodesis, particularly when treating younger patients. Thus, surgeons continue to gain a greater understanding of short- and long-term complications of arthroplasty. Here, the authors present a series of 4 patients initially treated with Mobi-C artificial disc implants who developed postoperative neck pain. Dynamic imaging revealed segmental kyphosis at the level of the implant. All implants were locked in the flexion position, and all patients required reoperation. This is the first reported case series of symptomatic segmental kyphosis after CDR.


2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 160-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dante Leven ◽  
Joshua Meaike ◽  
Kris Radcliff ◽  
Sheeraz Qureshi

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaofei Wang ◽  
Yang Meng ◽  
Hao Liu ◽  
Hua Chen ◽  
Beiyu Wang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Cervical disc replacement (CDR) has been widely used to treat one- and two-level cervical degenerative disc disease. Studies have shown the effectiveness of CDR in preserving range of motion (ROM) and delaying adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). Cervical sagittal alignment is an important factor affecting favorable clinical outcomes in cervical spine surgery. This study aimed to explore whether cervical sagittal alignment can be maintained after CDR and to identify the impact of cervical sagittal alignment on outcomes after CDR. Methods This was a single-center, retrospective study. 132 patients who underwent one-level CDR were included. Cervical sagittal alignments, including cervical lordosis (CL), segmental alignment (SA), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1 slope (T1s), and T1s minus CL (T1s-CL), were measured. The effects of cervical sagittal alignment on the CDR outcomes were analyzed. Patients were divided into the heterotopic ossification (HO) group and ASD group to determine the potential impacts of cervical sagittal parameters. Results The cervical sagittal alignment parameters, except for the SVA, were significantly improved after CDR and showed decreasing trends at the last follow-up. Significantly higher CL and T1s were found in patients with better ROM after CDR. SVA ≥ 20 mm increased the risk of anterior HO (odds ratio = 2.945, P = 0.007). Significantly kyphotic SA and lower T1s values were found in the ASD patients than in the non-ASD patients (P < 0.05). Patients with ASD at the inferior level showed significantly worse CL (P < 0.05). Conclusion CDR had limited function of improving cervical sagittal alignment. Poor cervical sagittal alignment after CDR was associated with HO, ASD, and less ROM.


2009 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 551-555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chan W.B. Peng ◽  
Martin Quirnoa ◽  
John A. Bendo ◽  
Jeffrey M. Spivak ◽  
Jeffrey A. Goldstein

2021 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 304-307
Author(s):  
Isao Kitahara ◽  
Nobusuke Kobayashi ◽  
Hiroaki Shirotori ◽  
Munehisa Shinozaki ◽  
Ken Ishii

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. s-0036-1582808-s-0036-1582808
Author(s):  
Girish Swamy ◽  
Konstantinos Mitsiou ◽  
Filip Burget ◽  
Shashi Nanjayan ◽  
Rajendranath Bommireddy ◽  
...  

Neurospine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 563-573 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andre M. Samuel ◽  
Harold G. Moore ◽  
Avani S. Vaishnav ◽  
Steven McAnany ◽  
Todd Albert ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document