scholarly journals Dynamic cell contacts between periportal mesenchyme and ductal epithelium act as a rheostat for liver cell proliferation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucía Cordero-Espinoza ◽  
Anna M. Dowbaj ◽  
Timo N. Kohler ◽  
Bernhard Strauss ◽  
Olga Sarlidou ◽  
...  
1980 ◽  
Vol 12 (03) ◽  
pp. 94-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Goldberg ◽  
W. Strecker ◽  
D. Feeny ◽  
G. Ruhenstroth-Bauer

2001 ◽  
Vol 532 (3) ◽  
pp. 661-672 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Wondergem ◽  
Wei Gong ◽  
Scott H. Monen ◽  
Sean N. Dooley ◽  
Joel L. Gonce ◽  
...  

Hepatology ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 1381-1391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Covadonga Pañeda ◽  
Itziar Gorospe ◽  
Blanca Herrera ◽  
Toshikazu Nakamura ◽  
Isabel Fabregat ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 152 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming W Chou ◽  
Marina V Mikhailova ◽  
Jasyl Nichols ◽  
Lionel A Poirier ◽  
Alan Warbritton ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucía Cordero-Espinoza ◽  
Timo N. Kohler ◽  
Anna M. Dowbaj ◽  
Bernhard Strauss ◽  
Olga Sarlidou ◽  
...  

AbstractIn the homeostatic liver, ductal cells intermingle with a microenvironment of endothelial and mesenchymal cells to form the functional unit of the portal tract. Ductal cells proliferate rarely in homeostasis but do so transiently after tissue injury to replenish any lost epithelium. We have shown that liver ductal cells can be expanded as liver organoids that recapitulate several of the cell-autonomous mechanisms of regeneration, but lack the stromal cell milieu of the biliary tract in vivo. Here, we describe a subpopulation of SCA1+ periportal mesenchymal cells that closely surrounds ductal cells in vivo and exerts a dual control on their proliferative capacity. Mesenchymal-secreted mitogens support liver organoid formation and expansion from differentiated ductal cells. However, direct mesenchymal-to-ductal cell-cell contact, established following a microfluidic co-encapsulation that enables the cells to self-organize into chimeric organoid structures, abolishes ductal cell proliferation in a mesenchyme-dose dependent manner. We found that it is the ratio between mesenchymal and epithelial cell contacts that determines the net outcome of ductal cell proliferation both in vitro, and in vivo, during damage-regeneration. SCA1+ mesenchymal cells control ductal cell proliferation dynamics by a mechanism involving, at least in part, Notch signalling activation. Our findings underscore how the relative abundance of cell-cell contacts between the epithelium and its mesenchymal microenvironment are key regulatory cues involved in the control of tissue regeneration.SummaryIn the homeostatic liver, the ductal epithelium intermingles with a microenvironment of stromal cells to form the functional unit of the portal tract. Ductal cells proliferate rarely in homeostasis but do so transiently after tissue injury. We have shown that these cells can be expanded as liver organoids that recapitulate several of the cell-autonomous mechanisms of regeneration, but lack the stromal cell milieu of the portal tract in vivo. Here, we describe a subpopulation of SCA1+ periportal mesenchymal niche cells that closely surrounds ductal cells in vivo and exerts a dual control on their proliferative capacity. Mesenchymal-secreted mitogens support liver organoid formation and expansion from differentiated ductal cells. However, direct mesenchymal-to-ductal cell-cell contact, established through a microfluidic co-encapsulation method that enables the cells to self-organize into chimeric organoid structures, abolishes ductal cell proliferation in a mesenchyme-dose dependent manner. We found that it is the ratio between mesenchymal and epithelial cell contacts that determines the net outcome of ductal cell proliferation both in vitro, and in vivo, during damage-regeneration. SCA1+ mesenchymal cells control ductal cell proliferation dynamics by a mechanism involving, at least in part, Notch signalling activation. Our findings re-evaluate the concept of the cellular niche, whereby the proportions of cell-cell contacts between the epithelium and its mesenchymal niche, and not the absolute cell numbers, are the key regulatory cues involved in the control of tissue regeneration.


2014 ◽  
Vol 92 (3) ◽  
pp. 226-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rani Watts ◽  
Mostafa Ghozlan ◽  
Curtis C. Hughey ◽  
Virginia L. Johnsen ◽  
Jane Shearer ◽  
...  

Although myostatin functions primarily as a negative regulator of skeletal muscle growth and development, accumulating biological and epidemiological evidence indicates an important contributing role in liver disease. In this study, we demonstrate that myostatin suppresses the proliferation of mouse Hepa-1c1c7 murine-derived liver cells (50%; p < 0.001) in part by reducing the expression of the cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases that elicit G1-S phase transition of the cell cycle (p < 0.001). Furthermore, real-time PCR-based quantification of the long noncoding RNA metastasis associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1 (Malat1), recently identified as a myostatin-responsive transcript in skeletal muscle, revealed a significant downregulation (25% and 50%, respectively; p < 0.05) in the livers of myostatin-treated mice and liver cells. The importance of Malat1 in liver cell proliferation was confirmed via arrested liver cell proliferation (p < 0.05) in response to partial Malat1 siRNA-mediated knockdown. Myostatin also significantly blunted insulin-stimulated glucose uptake and Akt phosphorylation in liver cells while increasing the phosphorylation of myristoylated alanine-rich C-kinase substrate (MARCKS), a protein that is essential for cancer cell proliferation and insulin-stimulated glucose transport. Together, these findings reveal a plausible mechanism by which circulating myostatin contributes to the diminished regenerative capacity of the liver and diseases characterized by liver insulin resistance.


1980 ◽  
Vol 97 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Norpoth ◽  
D. Gottschalk ◽  
I. Gottschalk ◽  
U. Witting ◽  
H. Thomas ◽  
...  

Toxicology ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 118 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 195-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronny Fransson-steen ◽  
Thomas L. Goldsworthy ◽  
Gregory L. Kedderis ◽  
robert R. Maronpot

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document