Staging of Esophageal Malignancy

2021 ◽  
Vol 101 (3) ◽  
pp. 405-414
Author(s):  
Ealaf Shemmeri ◽  
Thomas Fabian
Cureus ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Farhan Ashraf ◽  
Seth Richter ◽  
Soe H Arker ◽  
Nour Parsa

Author(s):  
Nina Bandyopadhyay ◽  
Ronnie Fass ◽  
Takahisa Yamasaki ◽  
Colin Hemond

1980 ◽  
Vol 78 (5) ◽  
pp. 1115
Author(s):  
F.C.A. Den Hartog Jager ◽  
J.F.W.M. Bartelsman ◽  
G.N.J. Tytgat

2009 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. 3161-3168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Bower ◽  
Whitney Jones ◽  
Ben Vessels ◽  
Charles Scoggins ◽  
Robert Martin

2009 ◽  
Vol 75 (6) ◽  
pp. 489-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward Malin ◽  
Paul D. Kiernan ◽  
Michael J. Sheridan ◽  
Sandeep J. Khandhar ◽  
Cheryl Fraser ◽  
...  

The best curative treatment for esophageal malignancy remains controversial. In 2003, we presented our institution's experience with 124 patients treated from 1990 to 2001. Here we update that experience with an additional 6 years’ data. A total of 221 patients underwent surgical resection from 1990 to 2007; 128 had up-front surgery, 88 underwent surgery after neoadjuvant radiation and chemotherapy (NARCS), and five underwent surgery after neoadjuvant, single-agent therapy Principle outcomes of interest were 30-day and in-hospital mortality as well 3- and 5-year survival rates. Overall 3- and 5-year survival rates were 38 and 33 per cent. NARCS achieved complete pathologic result in 32 per cent of patients with corresponding 3- and 5-year survival rates of 58 and 53 per cent. The 3- and 5-year survival rates for all patients undergoing NARCS were 36 and 31 per cent versus 24 and 18 per cent for patients with up-front surgery for anything over Stage I disease ( P = 0.01). The 3- and 5-year survival rates for patients with up-front resection of Stage I disease were 78 and 70 per cent. Overall, 30-day and in-hospital mortalities were 1.8 and 2.3 per cent. Since January 1, 2000, hospital mortality has been less than 0.8 per cent. We prefer NARCS for malignancy of the esophagus, except in those patients with high-grade dysplasia (carcinoma in situ), suspected Stage I disease, poor performance status, or urgent/emergent circumstances.


2013 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 344-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyung Eun Shin ◽  
Kyung Soo Lee ◽  
Joon Young Choi ◽  
Hong Kwan Kim ◽  
Young Mog Shim

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document