Enhanced recovery in major colorectal surgery: Safety and efficacy in an unselected surgical population at a UK district general hospital

Author(s):  
Catherine J. Walter ◽  
Jane T. Watson ◽  
Rupert D. Pullan ◽  
Nicholas J. Kenefick ◽  
Stephen J. Mitchell ◽  
...  
2006 ◽  
Vol 88 (6) ◽  
pp. 562-565 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda L Thorne ◽  
Stuart J Mercer ◽  
Guy JC Harris ◽  
Jay NL Simson

INTRODUCTION An audit of patients presenting with colorectal cancer to our district general hospital during a 2-year period from November 1994 found that 12.1% of cases were diagnosed later than 6 months after initial presentation to a physician. This audit was repeated for a 2-year period from December 2001, to determine whether the introduction of a specialist coloproctology surgery service had led to a reduction in late diagnosis of colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Case notes were reviewed of all patients presenting with colorectal cancer between December 2001 and November 2003. Late diagnosis was defined as diagnosis of colorectal cancer more than 6 months after their first attendance to either their general practitioner or district general hospital. The results were compared with those of the previous study. RESULTS Of a total of 218 patients presenting with colorectal cancer during the study period, 14 (6.4%; 10 men and 4 women) satisfied the criteria for late diagnosis, with the longest delay being 12.5 months. Reasons for late diagnosis were false-negative reporting of barium studies (n = 3), inaccurate tumour biopsy (n = 2), concurrent pathology causing anaemia (n = 4), inappropriate delay in definitive investigation (n = 3), and refusal of investigation by patients (n = 2). CONCLUSIONS There has been a reduction of nearly 50% (12.1% to 6.4%) in the proportion of patients with a late diagnosis of colorectal cancer compared with our previous audit. It is suggested that an important factor in this improvement in diagnosis has been the introduction of a specialist coloproctology surgery service.


Gut ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 60 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A43-A44
Author(s):  
J. Subhani ◽  
D. Lindo ◽  
D. Gertner ◽  
R. Warburton ◽  
N. Alsanjari ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 102 (9) ◽  
pp. 689-692
Author(s):  
A Bryce ◽  
JM Wohlgemut ◽  
T Coyle ◽  
J Hannay

Introduction Placement of a duodenal or pyloric stent is a recognised palliative procedure for symptomatic relief of malignant gastric outlet obstruction. This procedure can be associated with significant complications, reinterventions and poor long-term relief of obstructive symptoms. However, there may be a faster return to diet and shorter hospital stay in comparison to other palliative procedures (eg gastrojejunostomy). The aim of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of duodenal stenting in our regional district general hospital in comparison to that of larger tertiary centres. Materials and methods All patients with gastric outlet obstruction who had duodenal stent placement attempted in our region between 1 August 2013 and 31 July 2018 were identified by retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained coding databases and medical notes. Patient demographics, safety outcomes and efficacy outcomes were then extracted. Results were interpreted with respect to data from best available published evidence from larger tertiary centres. Results Of 43 duodenal stent insertion attempts, 84% had a successful return to diet, 18% underwent reintervention, 18% suffered adverse events, mean length of stay post-intervention was 8.6 days and mean survival post-intervention was 132 days. Conclusions Patients with malignant gastric outlet obstruction in whom duodenal stent placement was attempted had similar outcomes to published data from larger tertiary centres. Duodenal stent placement remains an acceptable treatment option for these patients in our region.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document