Abstract
AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the remineralization ability, ion release, microshear bond strength and wear resistance of a claimed bioactive restorative material (ACTIVA BioACTIVE Restorative, Pulpdent Corporation, Watertown, USA) with the conventional resin composite (Filtek Z350 XT, 3M ESPE Elipar, Germany).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The remineralization ability was evaluated after 28 days using Energy Dispersive X-Ray (EDX) analysis. Ion release was investigated at three-time intervals: 1, 14 and 28 days. Calcium and phosphate ions release were determined by using ion chromatography system. Microshear bond strength was assessed using Universal Testing Machine. A wear test was conducted using a dual axis chewing simulator.
RESULTS: ACTIVA™ was found to induce remineralization to the demineralized dentin. Results revealed that ACTIVA™ released Ca2+ and PO4-3 ions, whilst Filtek Z350 XT did not. Concerning microshear bond strength ACTIVA™ without adhesive application showed unacceptable failure. Regarding wear resistance there was no statistically significant difference between them.
CONCLUSION: ACTIVA™ bioactive restorative material seems promising bioactive restorative materials. Clinical trials are recommended to compare clinical performance of ACTIVA™ with the other restorative materials.
Influence of different surface treatments on microshear bond strength of repair resin composite to two CAD/CAM esthetic restorative materials
