Computational models of collective behavior

2005 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 424-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert L. Goldstone ◽  
Marco A. Janssen
2022 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. e1009772
Author(s):  
Marina Papadopoulou ◽  
Hanno Hildenbrandt ◽  
Daniel W. E. Sankey ◽  
Steven J. Portugal ◽  
Charlotte K. Hemelrijk

Bird flocks under predation demonstrate complex patterns of collective escape. These patterns may emerge by self-organization from local interactions among group-members. Computational models have been shown to be valuable for identifying what behavioral rules may govern such interactions among individuals during collective motion. However, our knowledge of such rules for collective escape is limited by the lack of quantitative data on bird flocks under predation in the field. In the present study, we analyze the first GPS trajectories of pigeons in airborne flocks attacked by a robotic falcon in order to build a species-specific model of collective escape. We use our model to examine a recently identified distance-dependent pattern of collective behavior: the closer the prey is to the predator, the higher the frequency with which flock members turn away from it. We first extract from the empirical data of pigeon flocks the characteristics of their shape and internal structure (bearing angle and distance to nearest neighbors). Combining these with information on their coordination from the literature, we build an agent-based model adjusted to pigeons’ collective escape. We show that the pattern of turning away from the predator with increased frequency when the predator is closer arises without prey prioritizing escape when the predator is near. Instead, it emerges through self-organization from a behavioral rule to avoid the predator independently of their distance to it. During this self-organization process, we show how flock members increase their consensus over which direction to escape and turn collectively as the predator gets closer. Our results suggest that coordination among flock members, combined with simple escape rules, reduces the cognitive costs of tracking the predator while flocking. Such escape rules that are independent of the distance to the predator can now be investigated in other species. Our study showcases the important role of computational models in the interpretation of empirical findings of collective behavior.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina Papadopoulou ◽  
Hanno Hildenbrandt ◽  
Daniel W.E. Sankey ◽  
Steven J. Portugal ◽  
Charlotte K. Hemelrijk

Bird flocks under predation demonstrate complex patterns of collective escape. These patterns may emerge by self-organization from simple interactions among group-members. Computational models have been shown to be valuable for identifying the behavioral rules that may govern these interactions among individuals during collective motion. However, our knowledge of such rules for collective escape is limited by the lack of quantitative data on bird flocks under predation in the field. In the present study, we analyze the first dataset of GPS trajectories of pigeons in airborne flocks attacked by a robotic falcon in order to build a species-specific model of collective escape. We use our model to examine a recently identified distance-dependent pattern of collective behavior that shows an increase in the escape frequency of pigeons when the predator is closer. We first extract from the empirical data the characteristics of pigeon flocks regarding their shape and internal structure (bearing angle and distance to nearest neighbours). Combining these with information on their coordination from the literature, we build an agent-based model tuned to pigeons' collective escape. We show that the pattern of increased escape frequency closer to the predator arises without flock-members prioritizing escape when the predator is near. Instead, it emerges through self-organization from an individual rule of predator-avoidance that is independent of predator-prey distance. During this self-organization process, we uncover a role of hysteresis and show that flock members increase their consensus over the escape direction and turn collectively as the predator gets closer. Our results suggest that coordination among flock-members, combined with simple escape rules, reduces the cognitive costs of tracking the predator. Such rules that are independent of predator-prey distance can now be examined in other species. Finally, we emphasize on the important role of computational models in the interpretation of empirical findings of collective behavior.


Author(s):  
Kim Uittenhove ◽  
Patrick Lemaire

In two experiments, we tested the hypothesis that strategy performance on a given trial is influenced by the difficulty of the strategy executed on the immediately preceding trial, an effect that we call strategy sequential difficulty effect. Participants’ task was to provide approximate sums to two-digit addition problems by using cued rounding strategies. Results showed that performance was poorer after a difficult strategy than after an easy strategy. Our results have important theoretical and empirical implications for computational models of strategy choices and for furthering our understanding of strategic variations in arithmetic as well as in human cognition in general.


Author(s):  
Manuel Perea ◽  
Victoria Panadero

The vast majority of neural and computational models of visual-word recognition assume that lexical access is achieved via the activation of abstract letter identities. Thus, a word’s overall shape should play no role in this process. In the present lexical decision experiment, we compared word-like pseudowords like viotín (same shape as its base word: violín) vs. viocín (different shape) in mature (college-aged skilled readers), immature (normally reading children), and immature/impaired (young readers with developmental dyslexia) word-recognition systems. Results revealed similar response times (and error rates) to consistent-shape and inconsistent-shape pseudowords for both adult skilled readers and normally reading children – this is consistent with current models of visual-word recognition. In contrast, young readers with developmental dyslexia made significantly more errors to viotín-like pseudowords than to viocín-like pseudowords. Thus, unlike normally reading children, young readers with developmental dyslexia are sensitive to a word’s visual cues, presumably because of poor letter representations.


1989 ◽  
Vol 34 (10) ◽  
pp. 895-897 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Sternberg

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iwanaga Saori ◽  
Namatame Akira
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document