Do significant others influence college-aged students texting and driving behaviors? Examination of the mediational influence of proximal and distal social influence on distracted driving

Author(s):  
Neha Trivedi ◽  
Kenneth H. Beck
2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 1196-1196
Author(s):  
S. Freed ◽  
D. Stavrinos ◽  
L.A. Ross

2016 ◽  
Vol 81 ◽  
pp. S44-S47
Author(s):  
Kimberly Massey ◽  
Shruti Kant ◽  
Pina Violano ◽  
Linda Roney ◽  
William King ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 0 ◽  
Author(s):  
AymanH Jawadi ◽  
LauraI Alolayan ◽  
ThurayaS Alsumai ◽  
MohammadH Aljawadi ◽  
Winnie Philip ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ayuob Al Aufi ◽  
Cole Schmidt ◽  
Jackson Goetz ◽  
Kirolos Haleem

This study investigates the safety impact of distracted driving (texting while driving) for different roadway configurations (intersections, segments, freeways, and roundabouts; urban, suburban, and rural sections; and straight and curved road cross-sections) and various lighting conditions (nighttime and daytime) using a driving simulator. The study took place at Western Kentucky University in Bowling Green, KY. Fifty participants (30 young adults, 18 to 25 years old; 20 middle-/old age adults, 26 to 70 years old) drove the simulator, for approximately 10 min each. Video recordings and behavior observations (e.g., recording single longest off-road eye glance while texting and driving) were further documented. While texting and driving at the roundabout, significant differences were found between the mean lane positions of the young and middle-/old age groups. Additionally, a slightly higher speed variance for middle-/old age drivers existed while texting and driving on freeways during the daytime compared with their younger counterparts. Comparisons with the safe stopping sight distance revealed potential safety risks for all texting while driving situations for both age groups compared with nontexting situations. On average, participants with a higher distracted-driving crash-risk expended 0.676 more seconds glancing off-road than lower distracted-driving crash-risk participants. Furthermore, on average, lower-risk participants had a 3.99 mph speed standard deviation compared with the 5.34 mph speed standard deviation of higher-risk participants. It should be noted that the top five higher-risk drivers were from the middle/older population, whereas the top five lower-risk drivers were from the younger population.


Author(s):  
Maryam Merrikhpour ◽  
Birsen Donmez

Distraction contributes significantly to teens’ crash risks. Previous studies show that feedback can help mitigate distraction among young and adult drivers; however, the type of feedback that is effective for teenagers remains unexamined. This paper investigates whether real-time and post-drive feedback can mitigate teens’ driver distraction and reports preliminary findings from an ongoing simulator study. Data reported was collected in a between-subjects experiment with three conditions: real-time (n= 8), post-drive (n= 8), and no feedback (n= 9). Real-time feedback was provided as auditory warnings when teens had long offroad glances (>2 sec). Post-drive feedback was an end-of-trip report on teens’ off-road glances and driving performance provided on an in-vehicle display. Compared to no feedback, real-time feedback resulted in significantly smaller number of long off-road glances (>2 sec), smaller average duration of off-road glances, and smaller standard deviation of lane position. The effects observed for post-drive feedback were relatively minor.


2013 ◽  
Vol 75 ◽  
pp. S290-S295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Roney ◽  
Pina Violano ◽  
Greg Klaus ◽  
Rebecca Lofthouse ◽  
James Dziura

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document