Postchemotherapy Resection of Residual Mass in Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumor

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 389-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saum Ghodoussipour ◽  
Siamak Daneshmand
2006 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 372-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan K. Berglund ◽  
Sean P. Lyden ◽  
Eve C. Tsai ◽  
Isador Lieberman ◽  
Eric A. Klein

Urology ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 163
Author(s):  
O. Castillo ◽  
J.M. Campero ◽  
R. Sanchez-Salas ◽  
F. Secin ◽  
G. Vitagliano ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Joost M. Blok ◽  
Henk G. van der Poel ◽  
J. Martijn Kerst ◽  
Axel Bex ◽  
Oscar R. Brouwer ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose To evaluate the outcome of robot-assisted residual mass resection (RA-RMR) in nonseminomatous germ cell tumor (NSGCT) patients with residual tumor following chemotherapy. Patients and methods Retrospective medical chart analysis of all patients with NSGCT undergoing RA-RMR at two tertiary referral centers between January 2007 and April 2019. Patients were considered for RA-RMR in case of a residual tumor between 10 and 50 mm at cross-sectional computed tomography (CT) imaging located ventrally or laterally from the aorta or vena cava, with normalized tumor markers following completion of chemotherapy, and no history of retroperitoneal surgery. Results A total of 45 patients were included in the analysis. The Royal Marsden stage before chemotherapy was IIA in 13 (28.9%), IIB in 16 (35.6%), IIC in 3 (6.7%) and IV in 13 patients (28.9%). The median residual tumor size was 1.9 cm (interquartile range [IQR] 1.4–2.8; range 1.0–5.0). Five procedures (11.1%) were converted to an open procedure due to a vascular injury (n = 2), technical difficulty (n = 2) or tumor debris leakage (n = 1). A postoperative adverse event occurred in two patients (4.4%). Histopathology showed teratoma, necrosis and viable cancer in 29 (64.4%), 14 (31.1%), and two patients (4.4%), respectively. After a median follow-up of 41 months (IQR 22–70), one patient (2.2%) relapsed in the retroperitoneum. The one- and 2-year recurrence-free survival rate was 98%. Conclusion RA-RMR is an appropriate treatment option in selected patients, potentially providing excellent cure rates with minimal morbidity. Long-term outcome data are needed to further support this strategy and determine inclusion and exclusion criteria.


2006 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 607-608 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan K. Berglund ◽  
Sean P. Lyden ◽  
Eve C. Tsai ◽  
Isador Lieberman ◽  
Eric A. Klein

1992 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Willem E. de Graaff ◽  
J. Wolter Oosterhuis ◽  
Bauke de Jong ◽  
Jannie van Echten-Arends ◽  
Janneke Wiersema-Buist ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document