MP-19.08: Reduced dose BCG is effective in carcinoma in situ (CIS) of the bladder: long term results of a phase ii study

Urology ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 146
Author(s):  
M. Brausi ◽  
G. Verrini ◽  
M. Gavioli ◽  
G.C. Peracchia ◽  
G. De Luca ◽  
...  
2000 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 656-664 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadeem Q. Mirza ◽  
Georges Vlastos ◽  
Funda Meric ◽  
Aysegul A. Sahin ◽  
S. Eva Singletary ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (14_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5135-5135
Author(s):  
A. García-Velasco ◽  
S. Hernando ◽  
C. Mendiola ◽  
D. Castellano ◽  
A. Sánchez-Muñoz ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (14_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4585-4585 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. A. Hussain ◽  
D. D. Stocken ◽  
D. R. Peake ◽  
J. G. Glaholm ◽  
A. Zarkar ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (14_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4585-4585
Author(s):  
S. A. Hussain ◽  
D. D. Stocken ◽  
D. R. Peake ◽  
J. G. Glaholm ◽  
A. Zarkar ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2057-2057
Author(s):  
S. Chiesa ◽  
G. Chiloiro ◽  
S. Manfrida ◽  
A. Mangiola ◽  
G. R. D'Agostino ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 719-719
Author(s):  
Kia Homayounfar ◽  
Carsten O. Sahlmann ◽  
Martin Niessner ◽  
Johannes Meller ◽  
Lena-Christin Conradi ◽  
...  

719 Background: Previously, single anti-CEA-radioimmunotherapy (RAIT) with 131iodine(I)-labetuzumab after complete (R0) resection of CEA-positive CLM was well tolerated and improved overall survival (OS) compared to a control group without RAIT. In this phase II study, we examined safety, feasibility, and long-term efficacy of repeated RAIT in the same setting. Methods: After R0-resection of CEA-positive CLM, 63 pts (42 m, 21 f; median age, 64.5 yrs) with synchronous (n=33) or metachronous (n=30) CLM received RAIT with 40-50 mCi/m2 per dose. 45 pts were intermediate/high risk for early metastatic relapse according to the Fong score. Restaging with CT/MRI and FDG-PET was performed prior to each RAIT. Pts with persistent elevated serum CEA-levels or inconclusive lesions during post-operative restaging received RAIT, but were classified as “non-adjuvant.” Toxicity was classified according to NCI-CTC v2.0. Time to progression (TTP), OS and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were calculated. The median follow-up was 54 (range 6-127) mos. Results: After the first cycle of RAIT 14 of 63 pts experienced grade 4 hematological toxicity. Nineteen pts did not receive the second cycle of RAIT due to prolonged toxicity, impaired performance status (n=6), or metastatic relapse (n=13). The latter were further treated by resection (n=3) or systemic chemotherapy (n=10). Forty-four pts received the planned second cycle of RAIT. Of these, 4 pts newly experienced grade 4 hematological toxicity. For all 63 pts, the median TTP, OS and CSS were 13, 57 and 92 months, respectively. The truly “adjuvant” pts (n=39) had a an improved median TTP (26 vs. 6.6 mos, p<0.0001), OS (76 vs. 42 mos, p=0.03) and CSS (not reached vs. 42 mos, p=0.003) in comparison to “non-adjuvant” pts (n=24). Conclusions: Repeated anti-CEA-RAIT with 131I-labetuzumab is safe, feasible, and well-tolerated (100% compliance), with expected hematological toxicity. The long-term survival after RAIT is very encouraging, in particular for pts deemed truly “adjuvant” post-salvage resection of CLM at restaging prior to RAIT.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document