Availability of Lactation Accommodation Information for Urology Residency Programs

Urology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arshia Sandozi ◽  
Jeffrey Lee ◽  
Benjamin H Shpeen ◽  
Michael Silver ◽  
Karis E Buford ◽  
...  
Urology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 139 ◽  
pp. 37-43
Author(s):  
David J. Gangwish ◽  
Carolyn A. Parshall ◽  
Fares Qeadan ◽  
Martin Jurado ◽  
Renata N. Bennett ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Uday Mann ◽  
Ryan Ramjiawan ◽  
Jasmir G. Nayak ◽  
Premal Patel

Introduction: Postgraduate education is transitioning to a competency-based curriculum in an effort to standardize the quality of graduating trainees. The learning experiences and opportunities in each institution are likely variable, as no standard exists regarding the teaching curriculum offered through residency. The objective of this study is to examine the various teaching curricula among different Canadian urology residency programs and to identify which teaching modalities are prioritized by program directors. Methods: A 10-question anonymous survey was sent electronically to program directors at all 12 urology residency programs across Canada. Questions were designed to quantify the time allotted for teaching and to assess the various teaching session types prioritized by programs to ensure the successful training of their graduates. We assessed each program’s perceived value of written exams, oral exams, didactic teaching session, and simulation sessions. Responses were assessed using a Likert-scale and a ranking format. Descriptive statistics were performed. Results: Overall survey response rate from residency program directors was 75% (9/12). Sixty-seven percent of programs designated one day of teaching per week, whereas 33% split resident teaching over two days. Review of chapters directly from Campbell-Walsh Urology textbook were deemed the most valuable teaching session. Practice oral exams were also prioritized, whereas most programs felt that simulation labs contributed the least to residency education. All programs included review of the core urology textbook in their weekly teaching, while only 67% of programs included faculty-led didactic sessions and case presentations. Forty-four percent of programs included resident-led didactic sessions. Practice oral exams and simulation labs were the least commonly included teaching modalities. Conclusions: Although most program directors prioritize the review of chapters in the core urology textbook, we found significant heterogeneity in the teaching sessions prioritized and offered in current urology residency curricula. As we move to standardize the quality of graduating trainees, understanding the impact of variable educational opportunities on residency training may become increasingly important.


Urology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 ◽  
pp. 58-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Bortnick ◽  
Jeffrey Stock ◽  
Vannita Simma-Chiang

2008 ◽  
Vol 180 (2) ◽  
pp. 668-672 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vijaya M. Vemulakonda ◽  
Mathew D. Sorensen ◽  
Byron D. Joyner

2017 ◽  
Vol 225 (4) ◽  
pp. e162
Author(s):  
Shane Morrison ◽  
Geolani W. Dy ◽  
H. Jonathan Chong ◽  
Nathan C. Osbun ◽  
Sarah Holt ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amandeep S. Taggar ◽  
Kevin Martell ◽  
Siraj Husain ◽  
Michael Peacock ◽  
Michael Sia ◽  
...  

Introduction: Residency experiences and teaching in oncology among urology residents are variable across Canada. We sought to identify how radiation and medical oncology concepts, as they pertain to genitourinary malignancies, are taught to urology residents.Methods: A total of 190 trainees enrolled in Canadian urology residency training programs were invited to participate in the study from January 2016 to June 2016. Participants completed an online questionnaire addressing the training they received.Results: The overall response rate was 32%. Twenty-three percent of respondents were in their fellowship year; 17%, 20%, 10%, 17%, and 12% were first-, second-, third-, fourth-, and fifth-year residents, respectively, with a median of four (range 1–9) respondents from each training program. Ninety-five percent of respondents had academic half-day (AHD) as part of their training that included radiotherapy (61%) and chemotherapy (51%) teaching. Most respondents indicated their main exposure to chemotherapy and radiation came from informal teaching in urology clinics. Twentynine percent and 41%, of participants had mandatory rotations in radiation and medical oncology, respectively. Only 6% of respondents used their voluntary elective time in these disciplines and most voluntary electives were of 1–2-week duration. Despite this, 90% of respondents preferred some mandatory radiation and medical oncology training.Conclusions: Most of the limited exposure that urology residents have to medical and radiation oncology is through AHD or informal urology clinics, despite a desire among current urology trainees to have clinical exposure in these areas. Moving forward, urology residency programs should consider integrating medical and radiation oncology rotations into the residency program curriculum.


2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (8) ◽  
pp. 2724-2731 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samer Shamout ◽  
Sero Andonian ◽  
Hani Kabbara ◽  
Jacques Corcos ◽  
Lysanne Campeau

2005 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 95
Author(s):  
D Pascali ◽  
V A. Minassian ◽  
J Kawakami ◽  
D Lovatsis ◽  
H P. Drutz

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document