scholarly journals Endoscopic ultrasound–guided liver biopsy: needle types and suction methods

VideoGIE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Vozzo ◽  
Mohannad Abou Saleh ◽  
Richard Drake ◽  
Prabhleen Chahal
2018 ◽  
Vol 87 (6) ◽  
pp. AB75-AB76
Author(s):  
Muhammad K. Hasan ◽  
Evgeny A. Idrisov ◽  
Kambiz S. Kadkhodayan ◽  
Ehsan Rafiq ◽  
Udayakumar Navaneethan ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 87 (6) ◽  
pp. AB457-AB458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael A. Ching Companioni ◽  
Amitpal S. Johal ◽  
Bradley Confer ◽  
Harshit S. Khara ◽  
David L. Diehl

Endoscopy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (11) ◽  
pp. 1059-1065 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael A. Ching-Companioni ◽  
David L. Diehl ◽  
Amitpal S. Johal ◽  
Bradley D. Confer ◽  
Harshit S. Khara

Abstract Background Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) is a safe and effective method for accomplishing parenchymal liver biopsy. The aim of this study was to compare a 19 G aspiration needle (FNA) with a 19 G Franseen-tip core biopsy needle (FNB) for EUS-LB. Methods This was a prospective, parallel group, randomized trial comparing the tissue yields and adequacy of a 19 G FNA needle vs. a 19 G FNB needle for EUS-LB. The primary outcome was length of the longest piece of liver core specimen. Secondary outcomes were aggregate specimen length, number of complete portal triads (CPTs), and adverse events. One transgastric pass and one transduodenal pass were performed with the same needle in each patient. Specimen lengths were measured before and after histological processing. Results 40 patients referred for EUS-LB were randomized to either the FNA group (n = 20) or the FNB group (n = 20). Both groups had similar patient characteristics. FNB biopsies yielded longer mean (standard deviation) specimen lengths (pre-processing mean 2.09 cm [0.41] vs. mean 1.47 cm [0.46], and post-processing mean 1.78 cm [0.66] vs. mean 1.05 cm [0.42]; both P < 0.001), a longer aggregate specimen length (pre-processing mean 15.78 cm [5.19] vs. 10.89 cm [4.38]; P = 0.003), and more CPTs (mean 42.6 25 vs 18.1 [9.3]; P < 0.001) compared with the FNA needle. There were no severe adverse events or difference in adverse event rate between the two needles. Post-biopsy pain was noted in 37.5 %. Conclusion EUS-LB using the FNB needle delivered longer liver biopsy specimens with more CPTs than the regular (non-core) needle.


2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Łukasz Krupa ◽  
Robert Staroń ◽  
Jacek Pająk ◽  
Frank Lammert ◽  
Marcin Krawczyk ◽  
...  

.


2021 ◽  
Vol 93 (6) ◽  
pp. AB211-AB212
Author(s):  
Abhishek Bhurwal ◽  
Mihajlo Gjeorgjievski ◽  
Peter Dellatore ◽  
Amy Tyberg ◽  
Haroon M. Shahid ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Jana S. Hopstaken ◽  
Leon de Jong ◽  
Jurgen J. Fütterer

Abstract Purpose For the safety and success of an ultrasound-guided percutaneous liver biopsy, needle visibility and needle tip identification are critical. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the influence of an innovative echogenic sheath placed over a standard biopsy needle on needle visibility in ultrasound imaging. Materials and methods Ultrasound videos of three sheaths with different coating characteristics (echogenicity) and one conventional liver biopsy needle were recorded at two angles (30° and 60°) and two depths (5 and 10 cm) in a human cadaver. The videos were blinded for needle type and presented to five independent radiologists who used Likert-scale scoring to rank each video for six characteristics on needle visibility. In addition, a phantom model was used to acquire standardized images for quantitative evaluation of the ultrasound visibility. Comparative statistical analysis consisted of a one-way ANOVA. Results The three prototype sheaths were ranked higher than the control needle at 60° with 5 cm depth, with an equal performance for the other conditions. The radiologists expressed more confidence in taking a biopsy with the echogenic sheaths than with the control needle, with 1 Likert score difference at 30°. Contrast analysis in the phantom model showed a statistically significant effect of a sheath (p = 0.004) on echogenic intensity. Conclusion This pilot study suggests that the use of an echogenic sheath may increase needle visibility, particularly for trajectories requiring steeper insertion angles. To investigate the superiority of the echogenic sheath over conventional needles, a clinical study is necessary.


Gut ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. gutjnl-2021-324815
Author(s):  
Nadeem Akhter Tehami ◽  
Keith Siau ◽  
Ryan Buchanan ◽  
Eleanor Jaynes ◽  
Ben Maher

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document