Bilateral hemotympanum following unilateral therapeutic nasal packing

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 101129
Author(s):  
Mardiyah Mohd Yusof ◽  
Ahmad Hafiz Ali ◽  
Ardhi Abdullah ◽  
Loh Siew Jing ◽  
Mohd Aliffitri Alias ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2016 ◽  
pp. 70-76
Author(s):  
Ngoc Si Tran ◽  
Thanh Dang ◽  
Van Dung Phan ◽  
Thanh Thai Le

Objectives: To study clinical characteristics and treatment outcome of epistaxis in head and neck trauma. Methods: A prospective descriptive study of 71 cases of epistaxis managed at Hue Center Hospital and Hue Univesity Hospital from April 2015 to June 2016. Results: Most of bleeding times were at night (59.2%). Unilateral bleeding was seen in almost 72.9% cases. Anterior nasal bleeding was noted in majority of the patients (70.4%), anterior and posterior nasal was 18.3%, posterior nasal was 11.3%. There were three stage: mild (77.5%), moderate (15.5%), severe (7%). Anterior nasal packing (70.4%) were the most common methods, Posterior nasal packing were 25.4%, Local cauterization were 1.4%, Constriction of the blood vessels were 1.4%, Embolization procedure were 1.4%. Complication rate was 8.4% include: fever (5%), pressure necrosis (1.7%), scars (1.7%). The rate of good recovery after treatment was 91.7%, partial recovery was 8.3%. The overall mean of hospital stay was 6,33 ± 5,61 days (range 1 to 36 days). Key words: Epistaxis


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eman Sobh ◽  
Fatma Elhussieny ◽  
Taghreed Ismail

Abstract Background Nasal obstruction is a significant medical problem. This study aimed to examine the effect of nasal obstruction and nasal packing on arterial blood gases and pulmonary function indices, and the impact of the elimination of nasal obstruction on preoperative values. Results The mean age of the study population was 26.6 ± 10.1 years, males represented 50.8%. Spirometric indices showed statistically significant improvement (preoperative forced expiratory volume in 1st second 66.9 ± 13.9 vs 79.6 ± 14.9 postoperative and preoperative forced vital capacity 65.5 ± 12.7 vs 80.4 ± 13.8 postoperative). Oxygen saturation was significantly lower during nasal packing (95.6 ± 1.6 preoperative vs 94.7 ± 2.8 with nasal pack), and significant improvement (97.2 ± 1.4) was observed after removal of the nasal pack. Nasal obstruction scores significantly improved. Conclusion The results of this study indicate that either simple nasal obstruction or nasal packing may cause hypoxemia and abnormalities in lung function tests. Hypoxemia was more evident with nasal packing.


Author(s):  
M. Ceraudo ◽  
L.M. Cavallo ◽  
D. Criminelli Rossi ◽  
D. Solari ◽  
P. Anania ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 80-83
Author(s):  
Ashish Dhakal ◽  
Bikash Lal Shrestha ◽  
Monika Pokharel

Background: Nasal packing is commonly done after septal surgeries. Nonabsorbable nasal pack is used to minimize bleeding from surgery site, support the mucoperichondrial flaps, and minimize the risk of formation of septal hematomas and adhesions. However, these materials cause pain and discomfort in-situ as well as during removal. This study was done to evaluate the effect of 2% lignocaine rehydration of nasal pack on pain during pack removal. Methods: This prospective study was conducted on 60 patients who had undergone septoplasty. The patients were divided into 2 groups: Lignocaine and Normal saline group, with 30 patients each. In the Lignocaine group, 2.5 ml of 2% of lignocaine was diluted with 2.5 ml of distilled water and was injected into the nasal pack; and in Normal saline group, 5 ml of normal saline was injected into the nasal pack. Nothing was injected to the left nostril, which acted as a control, in both groups. All patients were asked severity of pain during removal of nasal packing by VAS. Results: In lignocaine group, mean pain score was 3.73 ± 1.63 on lignocaine side and 6.23 ± 1.69 on control side (U=109.5, p<0.001). In Normal saline group, it was 6.5 ± 1.7 on normal saline side and 6.23 ± 1.96 on control side (U=425.5, p=0.711). On comparing VAS between lignocaine and normal saline group, pain was significantly lower in the lignocaine group (U=112.5, p<0.001) Conclusion: Rehydrating nasal pack with 2% topical lignocaine is a useful method to reduce pain during nasal pack removal.


2009 ◽  
Vol 63 (5) ◽  
pp. 757-759 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Bajaj ◽  
A. N. Kanatas ◽  
S. Carr ◽  
N. Sethi ◽  
G. Kelly
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 127 (5) ◽  
pp. 1026-1031 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jong Seung Kim ◽  
Sam Hyun Kwon
Keyword(s):  

2013 ◽  
Vol 65 (S2) ◽  
pp. 406-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajashri S. Mane ◽  
Balasaheb Patil ◽  
Anjana Mohite

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document