scholarly journals Variability in RT-qPCR assay parameters indicates unreliable SARS-CoV-2 RNA quantification for wastewater surveillance

2021 ◽  
pp. 117516
Author(s):  
Aaron Bivins ◽  
Devrim Kaya ◽  
Kyle Bibby ◽  
Stuart L. Simpson ◽  
Stephen A. Bustin ◽  
...  
Genetics ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 165 (3) ◽  
pp. 1167-1181
Author(s):  
Pei-Wen Chiang ◽  
David M Kurnit

Abstract Using a sensitive RT-QPCR assay, we analyzed the regulatory effects of sex and different dosage compensation mutations in Drosophila. To validate the assay, we showed that regulation for several genes indeed varied with the number of functional copies of that gene. We then confirmed that dosage compensation occurred for most genes we examined in male and female flies. Finally, we examined the effects on regulation of several genes in the MSL pathway, presumed to be involved in sex-dependent determination of regulation. Rather than seeing global alterations of either X chromosomal or autosomal genes, regulation of genes on either the X chromosome or the autosomes could be elevated, depressed, or unaltered between sexes in unpredictable ways for the various MSL mutations. Relative dosage for a given gene between the sexes could vary at different developmental times. Autosomal genes often showed deranged regulatory levels, indicating they were in pathways perturbed by X chromosomal changes. As exemplified by the BR-C locus and its dependent Sgs genes, multiple genes in a given pathway could exhibit coordinate regulatory modulation. The variegated pattern shown for expression of both X chromosomal and autosomal loci underscores the complexity of gene expression so that the phenotype of MSL mutations does not reflect only simple perturbations of genes on the X chromosome.


2021 ◽  
pp. 104894
Author(s):  
Dominik Nörz ◽  
Moritz Grunwald ◽  
Flaminia Olearo ◽  
Nicole Fischer ◽  
Martin Aepfelbacher ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 114174
Author(s):  
Aileen G. Rowan ◽  
Philippa May ◽  
Anjna Badhan ◽  
Carolina Herrera ◽  
Patricia Watber ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ravo M. Razafimahefa ◽  
Louisa F. Ludwig-Begall ◽  
Françoise S. Le Guyader ◽  
Frédéric Farnir ◽  
Axel Mauroy ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Kenta Minami ◽  
Ryota Masutani ◽  
Youichi Suzuki ◽  
Meri Kubota ◽  
Naofumi Osaka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
David R. McIlwain ◽  
Han Chen ◽  
Maria Apkarian ◽  
Melton Affrime ◽  
Bonnie Bock ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Influenza places a significant burden on global health and economics. Individual case management and public health efforts to mitigate the spread of influenza are both strongly impacted by our ability to accurately and efficiently detect influenza viruses in clinical samples. Therefore, it is important to understand the performance characteristics of available assays to detect influenza in a variety of settings. We provide the first report of relative performance between two products marketed to streamline detection of influenza virus in the context of a highly controlled volunteer influenza challenge study. Methods Nasopharyngeal swab samples were collected during a controlled A/California/2009/H1N1 influenza challenge study and analyzed for detection of virus shedding using a validated qRT-PCR (qPCR) assay, a sample-to-answer qRT-PCR device (BioMerieux BioFire FilmArray RP), and an immunoassay based rapid test kit (Quidel QuickVue Influenza A + B Test). Results Relative to qPCR, the sensitivity and specificity of the BioFire assay was 72.1% [63.7–79.5%, 95% confidence interval (CI)] and 93.5% (89.3–96.4%, 95% CI) respectively. For the QuickVue rapid test the sensitivity was 8.5% (4.8–13.7%, 95% CI) and specificity was 99.2% (95.6–100%, 95% CI). Conclusion Relative to qPCR, the BioFire assay had superior performance compared to rapid test in the context of a controlled influenza challenge study.


2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
David R. McIlwain ◽  
Han Chen ◽  
Maria Apkarian ◽  
Melton Affrime ◽  
Bonnie Bock ◽  
...  

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document