In Reply to the Letter to the Editor Regarding “What's in a Name? ‘Global Neurosurgery’ in the 21st Century”

2021 ◽  
Vol 145 ◽  
pp. 543
Author(s):  
Russell J. Andrews
Geoderma ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 378 ◽  
pp. 114559
Author(s):  
Imelda Bates ◽  
Lydia M. Chabala ◽  
R. Murray Lark ◽  
Alan MacDonald ◽  
Paul Mapfumo ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 143 ◽  
pp. 644-645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amit Agrawal ◽  
Adesh Shrivastava ◽  
Rakesh Mishra ◽  
Sumit Raj ◽  
Pradeep Chouksey

2004 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 128-128
Author(s):  
David C. Clarke

The following is the abstract of the article discussed in the subsequent letter: Silverthorn DU. Restoring physiology to the undergraduate biology curriculum: a call to action. Adv Physiol Educ 27:91–96, 2003.—The National Research Council-sponsored report, BIO 2010: Transforming Undergraduate Education for Future Research Biologists, describes a number of significant changes that should be made to the undergraduate biology curriculum if we are to adequately train students to become the researchers of the 21st century. What should be of concern to the physiology community is the lack of identifiable physiology in the proposed revisions. This article describes the report and suggests some steps that physiologists can take to enhance our discipline in the undergraduate biology curriculum.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document