Is cauda equina surgery safe out-of-hours? A single UK institute experience

Author(s):  
Asfand Baig Mirza ◽  
Maria Alexandra Velicu ◽  
Richard Lyon ◽  
Amisha Vastani ◽  
Timothy Boardman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Aditaya Kumar ◽  
Phil Copley ◽  
Aimun Jamjoom ◽  
Khaled Badran ◽  
Christopher Barrett

Neurosurgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 84 (5) ◽  
pp. E271-E271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dillon Vyas ◽  

Abstract INTRODUCTION Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a spinal emergency with clinical symptoms and signs that have low diagnostic accuracy. National guidelines in the United Kingdom (UK) state that all patients should undergo an MRI prior to referral to specialist spinal units and surgery, if required, should be performed at the earliest opportunity. We aimed to evaluate the current practice of investigating and treating suspected CES in the UK. METHODS A retrospective, multicentre observational study of the investigation and management of patients with suspected CES was conducted across the UK, including all patients referred to a spinal unit over 6 mo between 1st October 2016 and 31st March 2017. RESULTS A total of 28 UK spinal units submitted data on 4441 referrals. Over half of the referrals were made without any previous imaging (n = 2572, 57.9%). The majority of referrals were made out-of-hours (n = 2229/3517, 63.4%), of which 2.9% (n = 45/1529) underwent surgical decompression. Patient location and prereferral imaging were not significantly associated with time intervals from symptom onset or presentation to decompression. Patients investigated outside of the spinal unit experienced significantly longer time intervals from presentation and from referral to undergoing the MRI scan. CONCLUSION This is the largest known study of the investigation and management of suspected CES. We found that the majority of referrals were made without adequate investigations. Most patients were referred out-of-hours and many were transferred for an MRI without subsequently requiring surgery. Cases not transferred experienced delays if undergoing an MRI scan outside of the spinal unit.


2008 ◽  
Vol 90 (6) ◽  
pp. 513-516 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Crocker ◽  
G Fraser ◽  
E Boyd ◽  
J Wilson ◽  
BP Chitnavis ◽  
...  

INTRODUCTION The timing of surgery in cauda equina syndrome due to prolapsed intervertebral disc remains controversial. Assessment of these patients requires magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which is of limited availability outside normal working hours in the UK. PATIENTS AND METHODS We reviewed radiological results in all patients undergoing emergency MRI within our unit for suspected cauda equina syndrome over a 2-year period, and all subjects undergoing emergency lumbar discectomy for cauda equina syndrome within the same period. Outcome measures were: proportion of positive findings in symptomatic patients and proportion of patients referred with diagnostic MRI scans undergoing emergency surgery. We also assessed outcomes of patients having surgery for cauda equina syndrome in terms of improvement of pain, sensory and sphincter disturbance. RESULTS A total of 76 patients were transferred for assessment and ‘on-call’ MRI; 27 were subsequently operated upon. Only 5 proceeded to emergency discectomy that night (prior to next scheduled list). This may be due to delays in timing – from referral to acceptance, to arrival in the department, to diagnostic scan and to theatre. With the second group of patients, 43 had emergency discectomy for cauda equina syndrome during the study period. Of these, 6 patients had an out-of-hours MRI at our hospital for assessment (one patient living locally). Most surgically treated patients experienced improvement in their pain syndrome, with approximately two-thirds experiencing improvement in sensory and sphincter disturbance. CONCLUSIONS These data support a policy of advising MRI scan for cauda equina syndrome at the earliest opportunity within the next 24 h in the referring hospital, rather than emergency transfer for diagnostic imaging which has a relatively low yield in terms of patients operated on as an emergency.


2006 ◽  
Vol 48 (12) ◽  
pp. 994 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nika Kojc ◽  
Marjan Koršic ◽  
Mara Popovic
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Irwin ◽  
Janika Vikman ◽  
Hannah Ellis

Background: Veterinary work is considered high risk and involves working with a range of hazards including large animals, high workload and long hours. A key potential hazard is making home visits and providing out of hours emergency care where vets often work alone, without support, and must travel long distances. The current study aimed to examine UK veterinary perceptions of safety climate, lone working and on-call tasks to gain a deeper understanding of the risk and hazards involved. Method: An online mixed-methods survey was used to gather quantitative data relevant to practice safety climate, and qualitative data regarding veterinary perception of lone working and on-call work. A sample of 76 UK veterinarians were recruited.Results: The quantitative results suggest that there may be practice safety climate issues around a lack of communication and discussion pertaining to safety, particularly in terms of maintaining personal safety. Key themes within the qualitative data included feeling pressure to treat patients, dealing with difficult clients, travel concerns and feeling unsafe when meeting clients alone and in remote locations. Conclusion: These findings indicate that personal safety requires more attention and discussion within veterinary practices, and that safety protocols and requirements should be shared with clients.


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dr Kathleen Ferguson ◽  
Dr Ramana Alladi ◽  
Dr Les Gemmell ◽  
Dr William Harrop-Griffiths ◽  
Dr Richard Griffiths ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document