The Patient Centered Medical Home and medical school education: An innovative interprofessional education model

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 41-43
Author(s):  
Skye Ochsner Margolies ◽  
Rebecca Cowan ◽  
Mark C. Rehfuss ◽  
Bruce Britton
Healthcare ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 63-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asaf Bitton ◽  
Anne G. Pereira ◽  
C. Scott Smith ◽  
Stewart F. Babbott ◽  
Judith L. Bowen

2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia A. Carney ◽  
M. Patrice Eiff ◽  
John W. Saultz ◽  
Erik Lindbloom ◽  
Elaine Waller ◽  
...  

Abstract Background New approaches to enhance access in primary care necessitate change in the model for residency education. Purpose To describe instrument design, development and testing, and data collection strategies for residency programs, continuity clinics, residents, and program graduates participating in the Preparing the Personal Physician for Practice (P4) project. Methods We developed and pilot-tested surveys to assess demographic characteristics of residents, clinical and operational features of the continuity clinics and educational programs, and attitudes about and implementation status of Patient Centered Medical Home (PCMH) characteristics. Surveys were administered annually to P4 residency programs since the project started in 2007. Descriptive statistics were used to profile data from the P4 baseline year. Results Most P4 residents were non-Hispanic white women (60.7%), married or partnered, attended medical school in the United States and were the first physicians in their families to attend medical school. Nearly 85% of residency continuity clinics were family health centers, and about 8% were federally qualified health centers. The most likely PCMH features in continuity clinics were having an electronic health record and having fully secure remote access available; both of which were found in more than 50% of continuity clinics. Approximately one-half of continuity clinics used the electronic health record for safety projects, and nearly 60% used it for quality-improvement projects. Conclusions We created a collaborative evaluation model in all 14 P4 residencies. Successful implementation of new surveys revealed important baseline features of residencies and residents that are pertinent to studying the effects of new training models for the PCMH.


2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 580-588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fadya El Rayess ◽  
Roberta Goldman ◽  
Christopher Furey ◽  
Rabin Chandran ◽  
Arnold R. Goldberg ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Background The patient-centered medical home (PCMH) is an accepted framework for delivering high-quality primary care, prompting many residencies to transform their practices into PCMHs. Few studies have assessed the impact of these changes on residents' and faculty members' PCMH attitudes, knowledge, and skills. The family medicine program at Brown University achieved Level 3 PCMH accreditation in 2010, with training relying primarily on situated learning through immersion in PCMH practice, supplemented by didactics and a few focused clinical activities. Objective To assess PCMH knowledge and attitudes after Level 3 PCMH accreditation and to identify additional educational needs. Methods We used a qualitative approach, with semistructured, individual interviews with 12 of the program's 13 postgraduate year 3 residents and 17 of 19 core faculty. Questions assessed PCMH knowledge, attitudes, and preparedness for practicing, teaching, and leading within a PCMH. Interviews were analyzed using the immersion/crystallization method. Results Residents and faculty generally had positive attitudes toward PCMH. However, many expressed concerns that they lacked specific PCMH knowledge, and felt inadequately prepared to implement PCMH principles into their future practice or teaching. Some exceptions were faculty and resident leaders who were actively involved in the PCMH transformation. Barriers included lack of time and central roles in PCMH activities. Conclusions Practicing in a certified PCMH training program, with passive PCMH roles and supplemental didactics, appears inadequate in preparing residents and faculty for practice or teaching in a PCMH. Purposeful curricular design and evaluation, with faculty development, may be needed to prepare the future leaders of primary care.


2015 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 168-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. E. Goldman ◽  
D. R. Parker ◽  
J. Brown ◽  
J. Walker ◽  
C. B. Eaton ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document