Engaging interprofessional students and providers for primary care redesign

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. 43-47
Author(s):  
Lisa Burkhart ◽  
Trisha Leann Horsley ◽  
Jorgia Connor ◽  
Joanne Kouba ◽  
Aaron Michelfelder ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Leah Palapar ◽  
Laura Wilkinson-Meyers ◽  
Thomas Lumley ◽  
Ngaire Kerse

Abstract Background Reducing ambulatory sensitive hospitalisations (ASHs) is a strategy to control spending on hospital care and to improve quality of primary health care. This research investigated whether ASH rates in older people varied by GP and practice characteristics. Methods We identified ASHs from the national dataset of hospital events for 3755 community-dwelling participants aged 75+ enrolled in a cluster randomised controlled trial involving 60 randomly selected general practices in three regions in New Zealand. Poisson mixed models of 36-month ASH rates were fitted for the entire sample, for complex participants, and non-complex participants. We examined variation in ASH rates according to GP- and practice-level characteristics after adjusting for patient-level predictors of ASH. Results Lower rates of ASHs were observed in female GPs (IRR 0.83, CI 0.71 to 0.98). In non-complex participants, but not complex participants, practices in more deprived areas had lower ASH rates (4% lower per deprivation decile higher, IRR 0.96, CI 0.92 to 1.00), whereas main urban centre practices had higher rates (IRR 1.84, CI 1.15 to 2.96). Variance explained by these significant factors was small (0.4% of total variance for GP sex, 0.2% for deprivation, and 0.5% for area type). None of the modifiable practice-level characteristics such as home visiting and systematically contacting patients were significantly associated with ASH rates. Conclusions Only a few GP and non-modifiable practice characteristics were associated with variation in ASH rates in 60 New Zealand practices interested in a trial about care of older people. Where there were significant associations, the contribution to overall variance was minimal. It also remains unclear whether lower ASH rates in older people represents underservicing or less overuse of hospital services, particularly for the relatively well patient attending practices in less central, more disadvantaged communities. Thus, reducing ASHs through primary care redesign for older people should be approached carefully. Trial registration Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Register ACTRN12609000648224.


2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (S3) ◽  
pp. 1144-1154
Author(s):  
Jillian B. Harvey ◽  
Jocelyn Vanderbrink ◽  
Yasmin Mahmud ◽  
Erin Kitt‐Lewis ◽  
Laura Wolf ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. 616-620 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin N. Fogel ◽  
Stephen Warrick ◽  
Jonathan A. Finkelstein ◽  
Melissa Klein

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-66
Author(s):  
James Normington ◽  
Eric Lock ◽  
Caroline Carlin ◽  
Kevin Peterson ◽  
Bradley Carlin

2014 ◽  
Vol 40 (12) ◽  
pp. 533-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Caplan ◽  
Sarah Davis ◽  
Sally Kraft ◽  
Stephanie Berkson ◽  
Martha Gaines ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. S24-S32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Chabot Smith ◽  
Corey Lyon ◽  
Aimee F. English ◽  
Colleen Conry

2017 ◽  
Vol 39 (10) ◽  
pp. 1372-1372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Burkhart ◽  
Fran R. Vlasses

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanne Reeve

Person-centred primary care is a priority for patients, healthcare practitioners and health policy. Despite this, data suggest person-centred care is still not consistently achieved – and indeed, that in some areas, care may be worsening. Whole-person care is the expertise of the medical generalist – an area of clinical practice that has been neglected by health policy for some time. It is internationally recognised that there is a need to rebalance specialist and generalist primary care. Drawing on 15 years of scholarship within the science of medical generalism (the expertise of whole-person medical care), this discussion paper outlines a three-tiered approach to primary care redesign; describing changes needed at the level of the consultation, practice set up and strategic planning. The changing needs of patients living with complex chronic illness has already started a revolution in our understanding of healthcare systems. This paper outlines work to support that paradigm shift from disease-focused to person-focused primary healthcare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document