Outcomes and prognosis of patients with recurrent cervical cancer after radical hysterectomy

2012 ◽  
Vol 127 (3) ◽  
pp. 472-477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian-Tai Qiu ◽  
Nor Anita Abdullah ◽  
Hung-Hsueh Chou ◽  
Cheng-Tao Lin ◽  
Shih-Ming Jung ◽  
...  
1987 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 316-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen C. Rubin ◽  
William J. Hoskins ◽  
John L. Lewis

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 331-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hee Seung Kim ◽  
Ranah Kim ◽  
Maria Lee

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shiqi Qiao ◽  
Hongtao Zhang ◽  
Xuemin Di ◽  
JinXin Zhao ◽  
Juan Wang

Abstract Background: The prognosis of cervical cancer is remarkable, but there are still instances of pelvic and/or extrapelvic recurrence after radical hysterectomy with platinum-based chemoradiotherapy. Sixty percent of the patients with radiotherapy (RT) failure have pelvic recurrence, and 80% of them relapse within two years after treatment. Recurrent cervical cancer seriously affects the prognosis and survival rate of patients. Due to the dose limitation for normal tissue, it is difficult to deliver a sufficient number of doses to recurrent lesions through reirradiation. With the rapid development of brachytherapy technologies such as three-dimensional afterloading brachytherapy, interstitial brachytherapy and radioactive 125I seed implantation, the overall survival (OS) of patients with recurrent cervical cancer has been improving. In the present study, a case in which the patient was successfully treated with radioactive 125I seed implantation is reported.Case presentation: The patient, a 47-year-old woman, was initially diagnosed with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB cervical cancer and received preoperative radiotherapy, radical hysterectomy, pelvic lymph node dissection and postoperative radiotherapy. After 95 months of follow-up, retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis and edema of the left lower limb . The size of the retroperitoneal lesion was 2.3 × 2.0 cm, and the size of the left supraclavicle lesion was 2.0 × 1.5 cm. Radioactive 125I seed implantation was performed for retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis and left supraclavicular metastasis. Paclitaxel and cisplatin chemotherapy were given after the operation. Three months after implantation, the size of the retroperitoneal focus was 1.5 × 1.1 cm, and the size of the left supraclavicular lesion was 1.0 × 0.6 cm. Thirteen months after implantation, according to the RECIST standard, the therapeutic effect reached CR. At the time of submission, the patient's progression-free survival was 6 years and 4 months.Conclusions: CT-guided 125I seed implantation is a safe, effective, and minimally invasive method for treating patients with recurrent cervical cancer after radiotherapy. The response of this patient indicates that 125I seed implantation can be used as a complementary treatment for recurrent cervical cancer after chemoradiotherapy and may also prove to be reliable for comprehensive treatment of cervical cancer.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (7) ◽  
pp. 987-992 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giorgio Bogani ◽  
Fabio Ghezzi ◽  
Luis Chiva ◽  
Baldo Gisone ◽  
Ciro Pinelli ◽  
...  

ObjectiveRecent evidence has suggested that laparoscopic radical hysterectomy is associated with an increased risk of recurrence in comparison with open abdominal radical hysterectomy. The aim of our study was to identify patterns of recurrence after laparoscopic and open abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.MethodsThis a retrospective multi-institutional study evaluating patients with recurrent cervical cancer after laparoscopic and open abdominal surgery performed between January 1990 and December 2018. Inclusion criteria were: age ≥18 years old, radical hysterectomy (type B or type C), no recurrent disease, and clinical follow-up >30 days. The primary endpoint was to evaluate patterns of first recurrence following laparoscopic and open abdominal radical hysterectomy. The secondary endpoint was to estimate the effect of the primary surgical approach (laparoscopy and open surgery) in post-recurrence survival outcomes (event-free survival and overall survival). In order to reduce possible confounding factors, we applied a propensity-matching algorithm. Survival outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier model.ResultsA total of 1058 patients were included in the analysis (823 underwent open abdominal radical hysterectomy and 235 patients underwent laparoscopic radical hysterectomy). The study included 117 (14.2%) and 35 (14.9%) patients who developed recurrent cervical cancer after open or laparoscopic surgery, respectively. Applying a propensity matched comparison (1:2), we reduced the population to 105 patients (35 vs 70 patients with recurrence after laparoscopic and open radical hysterectomy). Median follow-up time was 39.1 (range 4–221) months and 32.3 (range 4–124) months for patients undergoing open and laparoscopic surgery, respectively. Patients undergoing laparoscopic radical hysterectomy had shorter progression-free survival than patients undergoing open abdominal surgery (HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.32 to 2.97; p=0.005). Patients undergoing laparoscopic radical hysterectomy were more likely to develop intrapelvic recurrences (74% vs 34%; p<0.001) and peritoneal carcinomatosis (17% vs 1%; p=0.005) than patients undergoing open surgery.ConclusionsPatients undergoing laparoscopic radical hysterectomy are at higher risk of developing intrapelvic recurrences and peritoneal carcinomatosis. Further evidence is needed in order to corroborate our findings.


2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 173-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ga Won Yim ◽  
Sang Wun Kim ◽  
Eun Ji Nam ◽  
Young Tae Kim

Background:The development of robotic technology has facilitated the application of minimally invasive techniques for complex operations in gynecologic oncology.Objectives:The objective of the study was to assess and summarize the current literature on the role of robot-assisted surgery in cervical cancer in terms of its utility and outcome.Methods:Literature review concerning the use of robot-assisted technology in the management of cervical cancer, including radical hysterectomy, trachelectomy, parametrectomy, pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy, and pelvic exenteration, was performed.Results:To date, 12 articles addressing radical hysterectomy, 5 articles of radical trachelectomy, and 6 articles of surgical procedure in advanced or recurrent cervical cancer, all performed robotically, are published in the literature. The advantages of the robotic system include 3-dimensional vision, tremor reduction, motion downscaling, improved ergonomics, and greater dexterity with instrument articulation. Because of these benefits, the robotic technology seems to facilitate the surgical approach for technically challenging operations performed to treat primary, early or advanced, and recurrent cervical cancer as evidenced by the current literature.Conclusions:Surgical management of cervical cancer may be one of the gynecologic oncology surgeries that can take full advantage of robotic assistance in a minimally invasive manner. Continued research and clinical trials are needed to further elucidate the equivalence or superiority of robot-assisted surgery to conventional methods in terms of oncological outcome and patient's quality of life.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document