Variation of preventive service utilization by state Medicaid coverage, cost-sharing, and Medicaid expansion status

2018 ◽  
Vol 115 ◽  
pp. 97-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin Bloodworth ◽  
Jie Chen ◽  
Karoline Mortensen
Author(s):  
Brenna E. Blackburn ◽  
Miguel Marino ◽  
Teresa Schmidt ◽  
John Heintzman ◽  
Brigit Hatch ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 107755872110396
Author(s):  
Ge Bai ◽  
Hossein Zare ◽  
Matthew D. Eisenberg ◽  
Daniel Polsky ◽  
Gerard F. Anderson

Nonprofit hospitals provide charity care to financially disadvantaged patients according to their self-designed eligibility policies. The Affordable Care Act may have prompted nonprofit hospitals to adopt more generous eligibility policies, but no prior research has examined the longitudinal trend. The expansion of Medicaid coverage in many states has been found to reduce charity care provision, but it is unclear whether the change in charity care eligibility policies differed between Medicaid expansion and nonexpansion states. Using mandatory tax filings, we found that both hospitals in Medicaid expansion states and hospital in nonexpansion states adopted more generous eligibility policies in 2018 than in 2010, but the change was greater in the former for discounted charity care; while the former provided less charity care regardless of their policy changes, the latter provided more when their policies became more generous. This study has implications for policy discussions on the justification of nonprofit hospitals’ tax-exempt status.


2014 ◽  
Vol 67 ◽  
pp. 306-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Heintzman ◽  
Miguel Marino ◽  
Megan Hoopes ◽  
Steffani Bailey ◽  
Rachel Gold ◽  
...  

Medical Care ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard A. Hirth ◽  
Betsy Q. Cliff ◽  
Jeffrey T. Kullgren ◽  
John Z. Ayanian

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 400-400
Author(s):  
Xiaosong Meng ◽  
Hersh Trivedi ◽  
Alexander P. Kenigsberg ◽  
Rashed Ghandour ◽  
Vitaly Margulis ◽  
...  

400 Background: Medicaid Expansion (ME) was introduced by the Affordable Care Act to improve access to care for low income individuals by increasing the annual income limits to 138% of the poverty line. However, not all states have elected to participate in ME. Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we sought to assess the effects of participation in ME on the four most common urologic malignancies. Methods: The NCDB was queried for bladder, prostate, kidney and testis cancer from 2012-2016, to span the time period two years before and two years after the main ME which took place in 2014. Trends in insurance status at time of diagnosis and effects on stage at presentation before and after ME were analyzed. Results: The percentage of patients with Medicaid coverage at the time of diagnosis for all four urologic malignancies increased significantly after 2014, with a commiserate decrease in the percentage of uninsured patients (Table). By 2016, significantly more patients had Medicaid coverage at diagnosis in ME states compared to those in Non-ME states (bladder 5.0% vs 2.5%, prostate 5.9% vs 2.2%, kidney 9.7% vs 4.1%, 19.5% vs 7.2%, all p < 0.01). However, the stage at presentation for all four urologic malignancies did not significantly differ for patients in ME versus non-ME states. Conclusions: Despite an increase in the proportion of patients with Medicaid coverage after 2014, surprisingly, there was not an associated change in stage at presentation for urologic malignancies in ME states. Further long-term analysis is necessary to evaluate if expanded Medicaid coverage impacts overall survival in this patient population.[Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document