Screening and confirmation of chloramphenicol in shrimp tissue using ELISA in combination with GC–MS2 and LC–MS2

2003 ◽  
Vol 483 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 153-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Impens ◽  
Wim Reybroeck ◽  
Jan Vercammen ◽  
Dirk Courtheyn ◽  
Sigrid Ooghe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 613-616
Author(s):  
Chen Li ◽  
Yanbei Ren ◽  
Xuan Dong ◽  
Chongming Wang ◽  
Jie Huang

1982 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-47
Author(s):  
GEORGE P. HOSKIN ◽  
FRANCIS S. D. LIN ◽  
PARIS M. BRICKEY
Keyword(s):  

A proposed procedure for reconditioning filth-contaminated shrimp was evaluated for its effectiveness in removing urea, a component of soluble filth. Contamination of fresh shrimp was simulated by placing 1.0 μl aliquots of a solution containing 0.025 × 10−6mCi 14C-urea onto the epithelium of peeled shrimp. Following the washing procedure, 41% of the labeled urea remained with the shrimp tissue.


2005 ◽  
Vol 88 (4) ◽  
pp. 1160-1166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marilyn J Schneider ◽  
Luz Vazquez-Moreno ◽  
Maria del Carmen Bermudez-Almada ◽  
Ramon Barraza Guardado ◽  
Magdalena Ortega-Nieblas

Abstract An efficient multiresidue method for analysis of fluoroquinolones in shrimp has been developed in which quantitation by fluorescence and confirmation by Multiple Stage Mass Spectrometry (MSn) is achieved simultaneously. In this method, shrimp tissue is extracted with ammoniacal acetonitrile and the extract is defatted and then evaporated. After dissolution in basic phosphate buffer, fluoroquinolones in the extract are separated by liquid chromatography and quantitated, taking advantage of their intense fluorescence. Eluate from the fluorescence detector enters the MSn, which allows for confirmation by monitoring ratios of 2 prominent product ions in the MS3 or MS2 spectrum. Using this method, 8 fluoroquinolones have been analyzed in shrimp samples fortified at 10, 25, 50, or 100 ppb levels. Recoveries for desethyleneciprofloxacin, norfloxacin, ciprofloxacin, danofloxacin, enrofloxacin, orbifloxacin, sarafloxacin, and difloxacin ranged from 75 to 92%, with relative standard deviation values of <6%. The limits of quantitation ranged from 0.1 to 1 ng/g. Enrofloxacin and ciprofloxacin were also successfully determined in enrofloxacin-incurred shrimp using this method.


2011 ◽  
Vol 93 (3) ◽  
pp. 565-574 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abhijit Mitra ◽  
Kakoli Banerjee ◽  
Subhasmita Sinha

1996 ◽  
Vol 79 (5) ◽  
pp. 1227-1235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allen P Pfenning ◽  
Robert K Munns ◽  
Sherri B Turnipseed ◽  
José E Roybal ◽  
David C Holland ◽  
...  

Abstract A previously published liquid chromatographic (LC) method for determining residues of flumequine (FLU) and nalidixic (NAL), oxolinic (OXO), and piromidic (PIR) acids in catfish tissue was applied to salmon and shrimp muscle. Identities of all 4 residues in salmon and shrimp were confirmed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). The tissue is homogenized with acetone, the acetone extract is defatted with hexane, and the quinolones are extracted into chloroform. The extract is further purified by first partitioning into base and then back-extracting from a solution acidified to pH 6.0. Analytes are determined by LC with simultaneous UV and fluorescence detection. Muscle tissue was fortified with each quinolone at 5,10,20,40, and 80 ng/g. Average recoveries and relative standard deviations (RSOs) for salmon, which represent an average of the 5 levels for each analyte, ranged from 75.9 to 90.8% and from 2.25 to 6.40%, respectively. Average recoveries and RSDs for shrimp ranged from 81.3 to 91.2% and from 7.34 to 10.7%, respectively. Identities of OXO, FLU, NAL, and PIR were confirmed in extracts of salmon and shrimp tissue fortified at 10 ng/g by determination of decarboxylated quinolones by GC/MS. Four diagnostic ions were monitored for OXO, FLU, and PIR, and 5 ions were monitored for NAL. All ion relative abundances were within 10% of those calculated for standard decarboxylated quinolones. Optimum conditions for decarboxylation and GC/MS confirmation are given.


1999 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 638-640 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.C. Bermúdez‐Almada ◽  
M.G. Pérez‐Tello ◽  
A.I. Valenzuela‐Quintanar ◽  
L. Vázquez‐Moreno

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document