Masseter muscle activity and temporomandibular disorders

2006 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 187-188
2012 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. 307-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meike Shedden Mora ◽  
Daniel Weber ◽  
Saskia Borkowski ◽  
Winfried Rief

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Liliana Szyszka-Sommerfeld ◽  
Monika Machoy ◽  
Mariusz Lipski ◽  
Krzysztof Woźniak

Aim. The aim of this study was to evaluate masticatory muscle electrical activity in patients with pain-related and pain-free temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) as well as in subjects with no TMD. Methods. Ninety children with mixed dentition were recruited to the study. Of this total, 30 subjects were diagnosed with pain-related TMD (TMD-P), 30 with pain-free TMD (TMD-PF), and 30 without TMD. We used Axis I of the Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (RDC/TMD) to assess the presence of TMD in the examined children. The electromyographical (EMG) potentials of the temporalis and masseter muscles were measured with a DAB-Bluetooth Instrument (Zebris Medical GmbH, Germany) at rest and during maximum voluntary clenching (MVC). Results. An analysis of the EMG recordings showed statistically significant intergroup differences in masticatory muscle electrical activity at rest and during MVC. Significantly higher rest temporalis muscle activity was noted in pain-related TMD subjects compared with that children from the pain-free TMD and non-TMD groups, as well as in TMD-PF children in relation to those without TMD. The EMG potentials of the temporalis muscle during MVC were much lower in patients with TMD-P than in pain-free TMD and non-TMD subjects. Masseter muscle activity at rest in the TMD-pain group was significantly greater, and masseter muscle EMG potentials during clenching were markedly lower than in patients with no TMD diagnosis. Conclusion. The use of electromyography to assess masticatory muscle function revealed alterations in the pattern of temporalis and masseter muscle activity in patients with pain-related TMD compared with the pain-free subjects.


2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (12) ◽  
pp. 848-855 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Yoneda ◽  
Fukie Niijima-Yaoita ◽  
Masahiro Tsuchiya ◽  
Hiroyuki Kumamoto ◽  
Makoto Watanbe ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. 1088-1092 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kemal S. Türker ◽  
Melissa Jenkins

The reflex response of the masseter muscle to the rapid unloading of a single maxillary incisor tooth was studied. Unloading of a static force of 2 N in the horizontal direction resulted in a short-latency excitation, inhibition, and long-latency excitation of masseter muscle activity occurring at latencies of approximately 13, 20, and 40 ms, respectively, with a corresponding change in bite force occurring slightly later in each case. Following the blocking of periodontal input by the injection of local anesthetic around the stimulated tooth, inhibitory responses were abolished. Therefore, it is concluded that the observed masseteric inhibition was caused by the unloading of periodontal mechanoreceptors and thus that these receptors may contribute to the jaw unloading reflex.


1984 ◽  
Vol 86 (4) ◽  
pp. 353 ◽  
Author(s):  
B.R. Smith ◽  
C.M. Flanary ◽  
C.L. Hurst ◽  
J.D. Rugh

PeerJ ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. e3556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Behrouz Alizadeh Savareh ◽  
Ali Ghanjal ◽  
Azadeh Bashiri ◽  
Monireh Motaqhey ◽  
Boshra Hatef

Introduction Different types of headaches and TMJ click influence the masseter muscle activity. The aim of this study was to assess the trend of energy level of the electromyography (EMG) activity of the masseter muscle during open-close clench cycles in migraine without aura (MOA) and tension-type headache (TTH) with or without TMJ click. Methods Twenty-five women with MOA and twenty four women with TTH participated in the study. They matched with 25 healthy subjects, in terms of class of occlusion and prevalence of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) with click. The EMG of both masseter muscles were recorded during open-close clench cycles at a rate of 80 cycles per minute for 15 seconds. The mouth opening was restricted to two centimeters by mandibular motion frame. Signal processing steps have been done on the EMG as: noise removing, smoothing, feature extraction, and statistical analyzing. The six statistical parameters of energy computed were mean, Variance, Skewness, Kurtosis, and first and second half energy over all signal energy. Results A three-way ANOVA indicated that during all the cycles, the mean of energy was more and there was a delay in showing the peak of energy in the masseter of the left side with clicked TMJ in MOA group compared to the two other groups, while this pattern occurred inversely in the side with no-clicked TMJ (P < 0.009). The variation of energy was significantly less in MOA group compared to the two other groups in the no-clicked TMJ (P < 0.003). However, the proportion of the first or second part of signal energy to all energy showed that TTH group had less energy in the first part and more energy in the second part in comparison to the two other groups (P < 0.05). Conclusion The study showed different changes in the energy distribution of masseter muscle activity during cycles in MOA and TTH. MOA, in contrast to TTH, had lateralization effect on EMG and interacted with TMJ click.


2008 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 434-440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianluca M. Tartaglia ◽  
Marco Antonio Moreira Rodrigues da Silva ◽  
Stefano Bottini ◽  
Chiarella Sforza ◽  
Virgilio F. Ferrario

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document