Relation between portal pressure and blood flow dependent on the degree of portal hypertension in patients with liver cirrhosis and tips

1998 ◽  
Vol 114 ◽  
pp. A1335
Author(s):  
P. Schiedermaier ◽  
K-A. Brensing ◽  
T. Sauerbruch
2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiaxiang Meng ◽  
Qing Wang ◽  
Kai Liu ◽  
Shuofei Yang ◽  
Xinxin Fan ◽  
...  

Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and endothelin- (ET-) 1 may aggravate portal hypertension by increasing intrahepatic resistance and splanchnic blood flow. In the portal vein, after TIPS shunting, LPS and ET-1 were significantly decreased. Our study suggests that TIPS can benefit cirrhotic patients not only in high hemodynamics related variceal bleeding but also in intestinal bacterial translocation associated complications such as endotoxemia.


1969 ◽  
Vol 08 (03) ◽  
pp. 232-241
Author(s):  
J. Vosmík ◽  
V. Bláha

SummaryUsing their own modified method the authors simultaneously examined the blood clearances of 198Au colloid and 131I-Rose Bengal and determined the ratio1. in a group of 11 patients with severe liver cirrhosis, portal hypertension and portosystemic shunts, both before and after artificial portocaval anastomosis, and2. in two patients with thrombosis v. lienalis, excessive splenomegaly and extensive portosystemic shunts before and after splenectomy. Ad 1. In 6 patients 55%) a reduction of the effective liver blood flow occured due to the artificial portosystemic anastomosis; the average decrease was ~ 20%. In 7 patients a significant enlargement of the total splenosystemic flow was observed as a result of the artificial communication.Ad 2. In both patients an increase of the effective liver blood flow occured after splenectomy. The minimal preoperative splenosystemic flow was ~ 0.152 and ~ 0.089 of the circulating blood per minute (expressed by means of kAu).The authors discuss the significance of the kAu and kBR values as well as that of the ratio for the estimation of changes in hepatic and portal haemodynamics.


1979 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 248-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Burcharth ◽  
T. Alsner ◽  
K. Bertheussen ◽  
T. Rosendal ◽  
S. E. Nielsen

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (31) ◽  
pp. 53-61
Author(s):  
T. Bentsa ◽  

Introduction. Liver cirrhosis (LC) is an important medical and socio-economic problem not only in Ukraine, but throughout the world. The urgency of this disease is due to its significant spread, increase of the number of etiological factors, as well as the occurrence of severe complications, which often leads to death. The prognosis depends on several factors, such as etiology, the severity of liver damage, the presence of complications and concomitant diseases. The aim of the study. To review the scientific literature and summarize the published studies devoted to the study of the etiology, classification, clinical picture and diagnosis of liver cirrhosis. Materials and methods. The content analysis, the method of systemic and comparative analysis, the bibliosemantic method of studying the current scientific research on the etiology, classification, clinical picture and diagnosis of LC were used. The search for sources was carried out in scientometric databases: PubMed-NCBI, Medline, Research Gate, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for the keywords: liver cirrhosis, diagnosis, treatment. 37 literary sources were selected and analyzed. Results. LC is currently ranked 11th among the most common causes of death. The common causes of LC are chronic alcohol intoxication and viral hepatitis B, C, and D. LC is represented by an increase in severity, which is characterized by the lesions of the liver parenchyma with necrosis, dystrophy of hepatocytes, their nodular regeneration, as well as its interstitium with diffuse proliferation of connective tissue, leading to liver failure and portal hypertension. Most patients with cirrhosis remain asymptomatic until they develop decompensated LC. Despite the existence of a number of LC classifications – by morphology, etiology, severity, course, hepatocellular insufficiency stage, the severity of the disease is usually assessed by evaluation of the hepatic functional reserve (according to the C. G. Child – R. N. Pugh classification). Patients with LC often have life-threatening conditions such as variceal hemorrhages, ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, hepatic encephalopathy, hepatorenal syndrome. Variceal bleeding is a major complication of portal hypertension, which is associated with significant mortality. Ascites represents the most common decompensating event in patients with LC. The appearance of ascites is strongly related to portal hypertension, which leads to splanchnic arterial vasodilation, reduction of the effective circulating volume, activation of endogenous vasoconstrictor systems, and avid sodium and water retention in the kidneys. Bacterial translocation further worsens hemodynamic alterations of patients with cirrhosis and ascites. Ascites is also associated with a high risk of developing the further complications of cirrhosis such as dilutional hyponatremia, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and/or other bacterial infections and acute kidney injury. Pharmacotherapy for LC should be implemented in accordance with up-to-date guidelines and in conjunction with etiology management, nutritional optimization and patients’ education. The main treatment of uncomplicated ascites is diuretics such as spironolactone in combination with a loop one. Vasoconstrictors and albumin are recommended for the treatment of refractory ascites. In its turn antibiotics play a well-established role in the treatment and prevention of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. The administration of vasopressor terlipressin and albumin is recommended for the treatment of hepatorenal syndrome. Pharmacological therapy of variceal bleeding aims to decrease the portal pressure by acting on its pathophysiological mechanisms such as increased hepatic vascular tone and splanchnic vasodilatation. Propranolol blocks the β-1 in the heart and the peripheral β-2 adrenergic receptors. β-1 blockade of cardiac receptors reduces heart rate, cardiac output and subsequently decreases flow into splanchnic circulation. β-2 blockade leads to unopposed α-1 adrenergic activity that causes splanchnic vasoconstriction and reduction of portal inflow. Both effects contribute to reduction in portal pressure. Carvedilol is more powerful in reducing hepatic venous pressure gradient than traditional nonselective β-blockers. Endoscopic treatment in many cases is used for the variceal bleeding (eg., ligation of the esophageal varices and tissue glue usage for the gastric varices). A shunt (transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting – TIPS) is used to treat severe and often repeat variceal hemorrhage or refractory ascites. Non-selective β-blockers effectively reduce variceal re-bleeding risk in LC patients with moderate/large varices. Conclusions. Liver cirrhosis is one of the most dangerous multi-organ diseases of a human with multiple pathogenetic links, the causes of which invariably remain hepatitis viruses, alcohol, toxic substances, drugs, ultraviolet radiation, genetic factors, some chronic diseases of the internal organs. There are a number of classifications of liver cirrhosis – by morphology, etiology, severity, course, severity of hepatocellular insufficiency etc. Examination of this category of patients requires timeliness, scrupulousness, compliance with a comprehensive approach using modern clinical, laboratory and instrumental methods. During the objective examination of a patient a doctor traditionally draws attention to the presence of telangiectasia, palmar erythema, jaundice, “raspberry” tongue, scratching marks, gynecomastia in men, ascites and “caput medusae”, during the palpation the liver is enlarged, dense, with a sharp lower edge, spleen is enlarged. Among the laboratory methods, in addition to routine ones, the immunological tests are used, among the main instrumental examination – ultrasound, computed tomography, indirect elastometry of the liver or Fibroscan, esophagogastrofibroscopy, puncture biopsy of the liver, in particular modern ones – vibrational transient elastography and magnetic resonance elastography. Although liver cirrhosis is the final stage of liver disease, this diagnosis cannot be considered a verdict for a patient, because today there are quite effective treatments using the principles of differentiation – the impact on the etiological factor, liver state and comorbid lesions and their complications often allows if not to cure the patient, then to prevent the negative disease course. Among them, there are diet, the use of etiotropic drugs, intestinal sanitation, correction of clinical and laboratory syndromes, portal hypertension syndrome, endothelial and autonomic dysfunction as causes of comorbid lesions and their complications.


1994 ◽  
Vol 266 (3) ◽  
pp. H1162-H1168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. Y. Wu ◽  
J. N. Benoit

Previous studies have suggested that the development of portal venous collaterals and subsequent portosystemic shunting is the key event responsible for the reduced vasoconstrictor effectiveness in chronic portal hypertension. The purpose of the present study was to test this hypothesis. Thirty-nine male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into four groups: end-to-side portacaval shunt (PCS, n = 11), chronic prehepatic portal hypertension (CPH, n = 10), acute prehepatic portal hypertension (APH, n = 8), and sham-operated controls (Sham, n = 10). The small intestine was prepared for microcirculatory studies. First-order arteriolar diameter and erythrocyte velocity were measured on-line, and blood flow was subsequently calculated. Once steady-state values were obtained the preparation was topically exposed to incremental doses of norepinephrine. The half-maximal effective dosage (ED50) for maximal vasoconstriction (diameter response) was significantly increased in PCS (4.5 microM) and CPH (1.5 microM) compared with Sham (0.8 microM). However, the ED50 was significantly lower in APH (0.17 microM) than in Sham. Similarly the ED50 for maximal blood flow reduction was higher in PCS (2.4 microM) and CPH (1.2 microM) compared with Sham (0.2 microM). The results demonstrate that vascular norepinephrine responsiveness is reduced in both portacaval shunted and chronic portal hypertensive rats, but not in acute portal hypertension. These data indicate that portosystemic shunting, not portal pressure elevation, is the key event leading to the reduced vascular norepinephrine responsiveness observed in CPH conditions.


1994 ◽  
Vol 168 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hector Orozco ◽  
Miguel Angel Mercado ◽  
Takeshi Takahashi ◽  
Gilberto Rojas ◽  
Jorge Hernández ◽  
...  

1985 ◽  
Vol 248 (6) ◽  
pp. G618-G625 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Sikuler ◽  
D. Kravetz ◽  
R. J. Groszmann

In rats with portal hypertension induced by partial ligation of the portal vein, we have recently demonstrated an increased portal venous inflow that becomes an important factor in the maintenance of portal hypertension. The sequence of events that leads into this circulatory disarray is unknown. We evaluated chronologically the chain of hemodynamic changes that occurred after portal hypertension was induced by partial ligation of the portal vein. In this model it is possible to follow, from the initiation of the portal-hypertensive state, the interaction between blood flow and resistance in the portal system as well as the relation between the development of portal-systemic shunting and the elevated portal venous inflow. The study was performed in 45 portal-hypertensive rats and in 29 sham-operated rats. Blood flow and portal-systemic shunting were measured by radioactive microsphere techniques. The constriction of the portal vein was immediately followed by a resistance-induced portal hypertension characterized by increased portal resistance (9.78 +/- 0.89 vs. 4.18 +/- 0.71 dyn X s X cm-5 X 10(4), mean +/- SE, P less than 0.01), increased portal pressure (17.7 +/- 0.9 vs. 9.5 +/- 0.6 mmHg, P less than 0.001), and decreased portal venous inflow (3.93 +/- 0.26 vs. 6.82 +/- 0.49 ml X min-1 X 100 g body wt-1, P less than 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document