Differences in implant stability associated with various methods of preparation of the implant bed: An in vitro study

Aim: This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the effects of implant designs on primary stability in different bone densities and bony defects. Methods: Five implant types (tapered-tissue-level, tissue-level, zirconia-tissue-level, bone-level, and BLX implants) were used in this assessment. The implants were inserted into four different artificial bone blocks representing varying bone-density groups: D1, D2, D3, and D4. Aside from the control group, three different types of defects were prepared. Using resonance frequency analysis and torque-in and -out values, the primary stability of each implant was evaluated. Results: With an increased defect size, all implant types presented reduced implant stability values measured by the implant stability quotient (ISQ) values. Loss of stability was the most pronounced around circular defects. Zirconia and bone-level implants showed the highest ISQ values, whereas tissue level titanium implants presented the lowest stability parameters. The implant insertion without any thread cut led to a small improvement in primary implant stability in all bone densities. Conclusions: Compared with implants with no peri-implant defects, the three-wall and one-wall defect usually did not provide significant loss of primary stability. A significant loss of stability should be expected when inserting implants into circular defects. Implants with a more aggressive thread distance could increase primary stability.

Download Full-text

Implant stabIlIty in dIfferent technIques of surgIcal sites preparatIon: an in vItro study

Oral & Implantology ◽

10.11138/orl/2014.7.2.033 ◽

2014 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

C RASTELLI

Keyword(s):

In Vitro Study ◽

Vitro Study ◽

Implant Stability

Download Full-text

Slow drilling speeds for single-drill implant bed preparation. Experimental in vitro study

Clinical Oral Investigations ◽

10.1007/s00784-017-2119-x ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 22 (1) ◽

pp. 349-359 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

R. A. Delgado-Ruiz ◽

E. Velasco Ortega ◽

G. E. Romanos ◽

S. Gerhke ◽

I. Newen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

In Vitro Study ◽

Vitro Study ◽

Implant Bed

Download Full-text

Preoperative assessment of primary implant stability with finite element-enhanced planning: an in vitro study

Journal of Biomechanics ◽

10.1016/s0021-9290(06)83742-5 ◽

2006 ◽

Vol 39 ◽

pp. S204

Author(s):

T. Bardyn ◽

E. Nkenke ◽

W. Hallermann ◽

S. Olsen

Keyword(s):

Finite Element ◽

In Vitro Study ◽

Preoperative Assessment ◽

Vitro Study ◽

Implant Stability ◽

Primary Implant

Download Full-text

Comparison of Measurements of Implant Stability by Two Different Radio Frequency Analysis Systems: An In Vitro Study

Journal of Advanced Oral Research ◽

10.1177/2320206820923251 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 11 (2) ◽

pp. 202-207

Author(s):

Cenker Zeki Koyuncuoglu ◽

Becen Demir

Keyword(s):

Radio Frequency ◽

Frequency Analysis ◽

Intraclass Correlation ◽

In Vitro Study ◽

Vitro Study ◽

Bovine Bone ◽

Implant Stability ◽

Bone Level ◽

The Relationship

Aim: To compare and evaluate the implant stability quotient (ISQ) measurements by two different radio frequency analysis (RFA) machines, Osstell Mentor and PenguinRFA. Materials and Methods: Twenty bone-level implants (3.7 × 10 mm2) were placed on a bovine bone in this in vitro study. The ISQ measurements were performed with the PenguinRFA and Osstell Mentor machines using the multipeg of the Penguin system. The measurements were repeated three times for each direction and an average ISQ value was calculated. The results were averaged (mean ± SD) and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to assess the relationship between the measurements. Result: The mean ISQ values for the Osstell and Penguin machines were 77.60 + 2.11 and 78.05 + 2.04, respectively. The ICC was 0.958. The ISQ values obtained from the Osstell and Penguin machines were significantly compatible ( P < .05). Conclusion: Both of the RFA devices provided similar and reliable ISQ measurements.

Download Full-text

Assessment of Osstell™ and Periotest® systems in measuring dental implant stability (in vitro study)

The Saudi Dental Journal ◽

10.1016/j.sdentj.2010.09.003 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 23 (1) ◽

pp. 17-21 ◽

Cited By ~ 18

Author(s):

Samer Al-Jetaily ◽

Abdullah AlFarraj Al-dosari

Keyword(s):

Dental Implant ◽

In Vitro Study ◽

Vitro Study ◽

Implant Stability

Download Full-text

The Evaluation of the Reliability of Periotest for Implant Stability Measurements: An In Vitro Study

Journal of Oral Implantology ◽

10.1563/aaid-joi-d-13-00303 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 41 (4) ◽

pp. e90-e95 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

Hakan Bilhan ◽

Altug Cilingir ◽

Canan Bural ◽

Caglar Bilmenoglu ◽

Olcay Sakar ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Measurement Method ◽

Interobserver Reliability ◽

In Vitro Study ◽

Vitro Study ◽

Insertion Torque ◽

Implant Stability ◽

Stability Measurement ◽

The Stability ◽

Stability Measurements

Periotest (Medizintechnik Gulden, Modautal, Germany) is a widely accepted implant stability measurement method, although the reliability is not well known. The aim of this in vitro study was to investigate the reliability of the Periotest in implant stability measurements. Thirty implants were placed in 3 cow ribs. The stability of each implant was measured by insertion torque, resonance frequency analyses, and Periotest and then compared. The Periotest values (PTVs) were measured by 4 different examiners. The measurements were repeated twice in both the buccal and mesial directions, for each implant at 2-hour intervals and the intra- and interobserver reliability of Periotest was measured. Results showed that the intraobserver reliability of the Periotest was excellent for the buccal PTVs but fair to poor for the mesial PTVs. The interobserver reliability of the Periotest was excellent for the buccal PTVs but poor for the mesial PTVs. No significance was found between the PTVs and IT values (P = .803) and PTVs and ISQ values, whereas a 47.1% significant correlation was detected between the IT values and ISQ values (P = .009). The present study indicates that only Periotest measurements from buccal result in excellent intra- and interobserver reliability for the quantification of the implant stability.

Download Full-text