Preoperative assessment of primary implant stability with finite element-enhanced planning: an in vitro study

2006 ◽  
Vol 39 ◽  
pp. S204
Author(s):  
T. Bardyn ◽  
E. Nkenke ◽  
W. Hallermann ◽  
S. Olsen
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 146-151
Author(s):  
Sampathkumar JayaKrishnaKumar ◽  
Rahmath S Shafiullah ◽  
Ramasubramanian Hariharan ◽  
Chitra S Krishnan ◽  
Navarasampatti S Azhagarasan ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ho-Chyul Han ◽  
Hyun-Chang Lim ◽  
Ji-Youn Hong ◽  
Su-Jin Ahn ◽  
Ji-Young Han ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 107 (6) ◽  
pp. 366-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Su-Jin Ahn ◽  
Richard Leesungbok ◽  
Suk-Won Lee ◽  
Young-Ku Heo ◽  
Kyung Lhi Kang

Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (19) ◽  
pp. 5537
Author(s):  
Perry Raz ◽  
Haya Meir ◽  
Shifra Levartovsky ◽  
Maia Peleg ◽  
Alon Sebaoun ◽  
...  

Our aim was to analyze the correlation between the IT evaluated by a surgical motor and the primary implant stability (ISQ) measured by two RFA devices, Osstell and Penguin, in an in vitro model. This study examines the effect of bone type (soft or dense), implant length (13 mm or 8 mm), and implant design (CC: conical connection; IH: internal hexagon), on this correlation. Ninety-six implants were inserted using a surgical motor (IT) into two types of synthetic foam blocks. Initial measurements for both the peak IT and ISQ were recorded at the point when implant insertion was stopped by the surgical motor, and the final measurements were recorded when the implant was completely inserted into the synthetic blocks using only the RFA devices. Our null hypothesis was that there is a good correlation between the devices, independent of the implant length, design, or bone type. We found a positive, significant correlation between the IT, and the Osstell and Penguin devices. Implant length and bone type did not affect this correlation. The correlation between the devices in the CC design was maintained; however, in the IH design it was maintained only between the RFA devices. We concluded that there is a high positive correlation between the IT and ISQ from a mechanical perspective, which was not affected by bone type or implant length but was affected by the implant design.


Materials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (19) ◽  
pp. 4349
Author(s):  
Ahmad Ibrahim ◽  
Marius Heitzer ◽  
Anna Bock ◽  
Florian Peters ◽  
Stephan Christian Möhlhenrich ◽  
...  

Aim: This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the effects of implant designs on primary stability in different bone densities and bony defects. Methods: Five implant types (tapered-tissue-level, tissue-level, zirconia-tissue-level, bone-level, and BLX implants) were used in this assessment. The implants were inserted into four different artificial bone blocks representing varying bone-density groups: D1, D2, D3, and D4. Aside from the control group, three different types of defects were prepared. Using resonance frequency analysis and torque-in and -out values, the primary stability of each implant was evaluated. Results: With an increased defect size, all implant types presented reduced implant stability values measured by the implant stability quotient (ISQ) values. Loss of stability was the most pronounced around circular defects. Zirconia and bone-level implants showed the highest ISQ values, whereas tissue level titanium implants presented the lowest stability parameters. The implant insertion without any thread cut led to a small improvement in primary implant stability in all bone densities. Conclusions: Compared with implants with no peri-implant defects, the three-wall and one-wall defect usually did not provide significant loss of primary stability. A significant loss of stability should be expected when inserting implants into circular defects. Implants with a more aggressive thread distance could increase primary stability.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document