DSM-IV conduct disorder criteria as predictors of antisocial personality disorder

2009 ◽  
Vol 2009 ◽  
pp. 276-277
Author(s):  
J.C. Ballenger
2007 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 529-538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather L. Gelhorn ◽  
Joseph T. Sakai ◽  
Rumi Kato Price ◽  
Thomas J. Crowley

1991 ◽  
Vol 100 (3) ◽  
pp. 391-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert D. Hare ◽  
Stephen D. Hart ◽  
Timothy J. Harpur

2017 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 265-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom Rosenström ◽  
Eivind Ystrom ◽  
Fartein Ask Torvik ◽  
Nikolai Olavi Czajkowski ◽  
Nathan A. Gillespie ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 36 (11) ◽  
pp. 1571-1581 ◽  
Author(s):  
DAVID K. MARCUS ◽  
SCOTT O. LILIENFELD ◽  
JOHN F. EDENS ◽  
NORMAN G. POYTHRESS

Background. Although the DSM-IV-TR is organized into discrete disorders, the question of whether a given disorder possesses a dimensional or a categorical latent structure is an empirical one that can be examined using taxometric methods. The objective of this study was to ascertain the latent structure of antisocial personality disorder (ASPD).Method. Participants were 1146 male offenders incarcerated in state prisons (n=569), or court-ordered to residential drug treatment (n=577). Participants were interviewed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II Personality Disorders (SCID-II) to assess ASPD symptoms; they also completed the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4 (PDQ-4) ASPD scale. Taxometric analyses were performed to examine whether ASPD is underpinned by a discrete category or a dimensional construct.Results. Multiple taxometric procedures using two different sets of indicators provided no evidence that ASPD has a taxonic latent structure. Instead, the results were far more consistent with the proposition that ASPD exists on a continuum, regardless of whether it is assessed using a structured interview or a self-report measure.Conclusions. Evidence that ASPD is dimensional suggests that it is best studied using continuous measures and that dichotomizing individuals into ASPD versus non-ASPD groups will typically result in decreased statistical power. The findings are also consistent with a multifactorial etiology for ASPD and with recent attempts to conceptualize ASPD within the framework of extant dimensional models of personality.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald W. Black

Antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) is characterized by irresponsibility, aggression, criminality, and, in some, a lack of conscience. Recognized for over 200 years, ASPD is associated with domestic violence, psychiatric comorbidity, substance abuse, and excess health care use. ASPD is highly prevalent, and most affected individuals are men. ASPD has its onset in childhood or adolescence, when it may be diagnosed as a disruptive behavior disorder or conduct disorder. Not diagnosed until age 18, ASPD peaks in severity in the late teens or early 20s. It is lifelong for most persons, although the trend is toward improvement in those individuals with an adolescent onset and a prominent antisocial lifestyle. Those who do best have milder syndromes, are married/partnered, have stable jobs, and are older. ASPD is thought to result from a combination of genetic and environmental factors. Some antisocial persons have shown functional abnormalities in limbic structures and the frontotemporal cortex, portions of the brain that control judgment and regulate impulses. There are no effective pharmacologic treatments, but some antisocial persons receive off-label medication to dampen aggressive tendencies and curb impulsivity. Psychotropic medication is also used to treat comorbid syndromes (e.g., major depression). Cognitive-behavioral therapy may be helpful in mild cases. Family and couples therapies may be important for antisocial persons who are partnered or have offspring. This review contains 1 figure, 2 tables, and 99 references. Key words: aggression, antisocial personality disorder, conduct disorder, impulsivity, juvenile delinquency, lack of remorse, psychopathy, sociopathy 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document