Adenovirus respiratory tract infections in infants: a retrospective chart-review study

The Lancet ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 391 ◽  
pp. S43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaden Jobran ◽  
Randa Kattan ◽  
Jamal Shamaa ◽  
Hiyam Marzouqa ◽  
Musa Hindiyeh
2015 ◽  
Vol 59 (7) ◽  
pp. 3848-3852 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer L. Schroeck ◽  
Christine A. Ruh ◽  
John A. Sellick ◽  
Michael C. Ott ◽  
Arun Mattappallil ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTThe Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has promoted the appropriate use of antibiotics since 1995 when it initiated the National Campaign for Appropriate Antibiotic Use in the Community. This study examined upper respiratory tract infections included in the campaign to determine the degree to which antibiotics were appropriately prescribed and subsequent admission rates in a veteran population. This study was a retrospective chart review conducted among outpatients with a diagnosis of a respiratory tract infection, including bronchitis, pharyngitis, sinusitis, or nonspecific upper respiratory tract infection, between January 2009 and December 2011. The study found that 595 (35.8%) patients were treated appropriately, and 1,067 (64.2%) patients received therapy considered inappropriate based on the Get Smart Campaign criteria. Overall the subsequent readmission rate was 1.5%. The majority (77.5%) of patients were prescribed an antibiotic. The most common antibiotics prescribed were azithromycin (39.0%), amoxicillin-clavulanate (13.2%), and moxifloxacin (7.5%). A multivariate regression analysis demonstrated significant predictors of appropriate treatment, including the presence of tonsillar exudates (odds ratio [OR], 0.6; confidence interval [CI], 0.3 to 0.9), fever (OR, 0.6; CI, 0.4 to 0.9), and lymphadenopathy (OR, 0.4; CI, 0.3 to 0.6), while penicillin allergy (OR, 2.9; CI, 1.7 to 4.7) and cough (OR, 1.6; CI, 1.1 to 2.2) were significant predictors for inappropriate treatment. Poor compliance with the Get Smart Campaign was found in outpatients for respiratory infections. Results from this study demonstrate the overprescribing of antibiotics, while providing a focused view of improper prescribing. This article provides evidence that current efforts are insufficient for curtailing inappropriate antibiotic use.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S156-S156
Author(s):  
Ashita Debnath ◽  
Esther King ◽  
Dimple Patel ◽  
Pamela Giordano

Abstract Background S. aureus, including MRSA, is a common colonizer of the nares. Recent data have shown that a negative MRSA nares screen by PCR has a negative predictive value of 98%. This implies that the absence of colonization can significantly reduce empiric vancomycin utilization. This study aimed to determine the utilization of MRSA nares screening on patients receiving vancomycin for respiratory tract infections (RTI) following the addition of the screen to the institutional RTI management guidelines. Methods This was a retrospective chart review of adult inpatients presenting to two community-teaching hospitals who were prescribed vancomycin for the treatment of RTIs. Patients were divided into pre-guideline (Jan-Feb 2019), post-guideline 1 (Jan-Feb 2020), and post-guideline 2 (Jan-Feb 2021) groups. The primary endpoint was the difference in percent of vancomycin orders discontinued within 24 hours of a negative screen. Secondary endpoints included the percent of screens ordered, re-initiation of vancomycin within seven days for RTI, and total vancomycin days of therapy (DOT) per 1000 patient days (PD). Results Of 493 vancomycin orders screened, 100 orders in each arm were analyzed. There was an absolute increase of 20.6% in vancomycin orders discontinued within 24 hours of a negative screen between the pre-guideline and post-guideline 2 groups (59.1% vs. 79.7%, p = 0.0177). When compared to the pre-guideline group, utilization of the screen increased by 15% in the post-guideline 1 group (48% vs. 63%, p = 0.0328) and 26% in the post-guideline 2 group (48% vs. 74%, p = 0.000164). There was no difference in re-initiation of vancomycin. A statistically significant reduction in total vancomycin DOT/1000PD from the pre-guideline to the post-guideline 1 and 2 groups (66 to 63 to 60, respectively) was also observed. Conclusion The addition of the MRSA nares screen to the institutional RTI guidelines increased utilization of the test and demonstrated a reduction in vancomycin utilization. With an increase in education, prospective audit and feedback, and prescriber comfort with the use of the MRSA nares screen in the post-guideline 2 group, there was significant improvement in MRSA nares screen utilization, vancomycin discontinuation after a negative screen, and vancomycin utilization. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document