Effectiveness of treatments for major depression in primary medical care practice: a post hoc analysis of outcomes for African American and white patients

1999 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 185-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Brown
1996 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 395-406 ◽  
Author(s):  
Herbert C. Schulberg ◽  
Kathryn M. Magruder ◽  
Frank deGruy

2008 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin G. Druss ◽  
Kimberly Rask ◽  
Wayne J. Katon

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Desouza ◽  
S C Bain ◽  
T Gondolf ◽  
T Hansen ◽  
I Holst ◽  
...  

Abstract Background In SUSTAIN 6, subcutaneous semaglutide once weekly added to standard of care significantly reduced major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke or death) vs placebo over 2 years in T2D subjects. Purpose Assess the effect of semaglutide vs placebo on MACE and blood pressure (BP) by race and ethnicity in a post hoc analysis of SUSTAIN 6. Methods Subjects were randomised to semaglutide 0.5 mg, 1.0 mg or volume-matched placebo. Data for the two semaglutide-dose groups were pooled and compared to the pooled placebo groups. Time-to-event data were analysed with a Cox proportional hazards model. Changes from baseline to week 104 were analysed using analysis of covariance. The interaction between treatment and subgroup was added to the models. Results Overall, 3,297 patients received treatment. Subgroups included Caucasian, Asian, Black/African American, Other (race), and Hispanic, non-Hispanic (ethnicity). Mean baseline characteristics were similar across subgroups (age 64.7 years, HbA1c 8.7%, diabetes duration 14.2 years). Time to composite MACE and individual components were improved with semaglutide across all subgroups. Semaglutide affected BP similarly across race and ethnicity, except for systolic BP in Black/African American subjects (Table). Race Ethnicity Caucasian Asian Black/African American Other Interaction p-value Hispanic Non-Hispanic Interaction p-value Semaglutide (n) 1,384 121 108 35 256 1,392 Placebo (n) 1,352 152 113 32 254 1,395 MACE and individual outcomes   MACE HR [95% CI] 0.76 [0.58; 1.00] 0.58 [0.25; 1.34] 0.72 [0.23; 2.28] 0.46 [0.08; 2.50] 0.8793 0.67 [0.33; 1.36] 0.74 [0.57; 0.96] 0.7978   CV death HR [95% CI] 0.98 [0.63; 1.50] 0.32 [0.04; 2.85] 1.01 [0.06; 16.20] n/a† 0.8089 0.79 [0.31; 2.00] 1.00 [0.63; 1.59] 0.6521   Non-fatal MI HR [95% CI] 0.69 [0.45; 1.07] 0.97 [0.36; 2.60] 1.37 [0.31; 6.12] 0.31 [0.03; 3.00] 0.6637 0.65 [0.18; 2.31] 0.74 [0.50; 1.10] 0.8562   Non-fatal stroke HR [95% CI] 0.70 [0.42; 1.16] 0.31 [0.04; 2.77] n/a‡ n/a‡ 0.9176 0.73 [0.16; 3.27] 0.60 [0.36; 0.99] 0.7995 Blood pressure at week 104   Systolic BP* ETD (mmHg) [95% CI] −1.92 [−3.09; −0.74] −4.98 [−8.61; 1.35] 4.47 [0.15; 8.79] −11.02 [−18.45; −3.60] 0.0008 −3.22 [−5.93; −0.51] −1.81 [−2.98; −0.64] 0.3489   Diastolic BP* ETD (mmHg) [95% CI] 0.36 [−0.32; 1.04] −1.31 [−3.43; 0.80] −0.07 [−2.56; 2.43] −3.41 [−7.73; 0.92] 0.1871 −0.18 [−1.75; 1.39] 0.16 [−0.52; 0.83] 0.6981 *Treatment difference between semaglutide and placebo (pooled 0.5 and 1.0 mg values for each treatment group) at week 104. †No events in the placebo group; ‡No events in the semaglutide group. BP, blood pressure; CI, confidence interval; ETD, estimated treatment difference; HR, hazard ratio; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular event; MI, myocardial infarction. Conclusion Overall there was no evidence of a differential effect of semaglutide on risk reduction in MACE and its components and on BP across race and ethnicity subgroups in this post hoc analysis. Acknowledgement/Funding Novo Nordisk A/S


1999 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 407-409 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte Brown ◽  
M. Katherine Shear ◽  
Herbert C. Schulberg ◽  
Michael J. Madonia

2008 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-100
Author(s):  
Carel van Wijk ◽  
Anja Arts

Due to changes in legislation, the Dutch tax department has become responsible for several allowances as well. This forces the department to improve the affective and motivational responses to its forms. In an attempt to do so, the department has included photographs and examples in a form for reimbursement of medical care costs. This form was tested in a field experiment by comparing it with three versions from which either photographs, examples or both were removed. 242 senior citizens gave their evaluations after working with one of these form versions. The inclusion of photos and examples appeared to make the form more attractive, less discouraging, and a bit more favourable for the image of the tax department. It also led to more self-confidence, but only among false optimists, i.e., those who actually had their answers wrong became more certain about their performance. A post-hoc analysis revealed that the scores on affective and motivational aspects correlated strongly, and almost exclusively, with the perceived intelligibility of a form. The addition of feelgood elements seems to be of limited relevance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document