Chapter 5 Interference in Complex Knowledge Structures

1993 ◽  
pp. 97-112
Author(s):  
Ulrich Glowalla ◽  
Mike Rinck
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Structures ◽  
Complex Knowledge

scholarly journals The Denotation of Copredicative Nouns

Erkenntnis ◽  
2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina Ortega-Andrés
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Structures ◽  
Lexical Meaning ◽  
Cambridge University ◽  
Bare Particulars ◽  
Complex Knowledge

AbstractCopredication is the phenomenon whereby two or more predicates seem to require that their argument denotes different things. The denotation of words that copredicate has been broadly discussed. In this paper, I investigate the metaphysics behind this question. Thus, mereological theories of dot objects claim that these nouns denote complex entities; Asher (Lexical meaning in context, Cambridge University Press, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511793936) thinks that they denote bare particulars; and the Activation Package Theory contends that they stand for multiple denotations. According to the Activation Package Theory, copredicative nouns stand for complex knowledge structures that offer a range of multiple potential denotations. In this paper, I claim that the Activation Package Theory contributes to solve some of the metaphysical questions that arise from copredication.

Knowledge structures and skill acquisition: Having an expert referent matters

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric A. Day ◽  
Matthew J. Schuelke ◽  
Jazmine Espejo ◽  
Paul R. Boatman ◽  
Vanessa Kowollik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Skill Acquisition ◽  
Knowledge Structures

The Influence of Existing Knowledge Structures on the Formation of Integrated Spatial Memories

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan M. Greenauer ◽  
Catherine Mello ◽  
Marios N. Avraamides ◽  
Jonathan W. Kelly
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Structures ◽  
Spatial Memories

Time's arrow in knowledge structures

1997 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elke E. van der Meer ◽  
Dirk Strauch ◽  
Reinhard Beyer ◽  
Herbert Hagendorf
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Structures ◽  
Time’S Arrow

Interactive Computer-Video Modules for Health Sciences Education

1989 ◽  
Vol 28 (04) ◽  
pp. 360-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. McArthur ◽  
J. Bolles ◽  
J. Fine ◽  
P. Kidd ◽  
M. Bessis
Keyword(s):  
Medical Informatics ◽  
Computer Control ◽  
Health Science ◽  
Knowledge Structures ◽  
Image Recording ◽  
Central Computer ◽  
Key Word ◽  
The University ◽  
Development Group ◽  
Basic Medical

Abstract:Advances in electronic image recording and computer technologyhave resulted in a remarkable increase in the power and flexibility of interactive computer-video teaching systems. The University of Washington Health Science Videodisc Development Group first demonstrated a laser videodisc controlled by a remote central computer in 1980. Even this rudimentary unit highlighted basic medical informatics principles including: rapid accessibility; a “generic” or multi-purposed format; ease of computer control; and large collections of valid, rigorously reviewed images. Advances in medical informatics have led to the development of the following previously undescribed series of teaching units:1. The hypertext programs Hypercard, Linkway, and Guide have been used with videodiscs to develop easy-to-use instructional and reference materials. These materials demonstrate the ease with which a computer-naive instructor may develop new programs and the advantage that the intuitive nature of these programs brings to student users.2. Patient simulations using single and double screens plus pre-defined knowledge structures;3. Interactive single topic tutorials using preset knowledge structures;4. A key-word-based disc searching system;5. Electronic video microscopy;6. A series of programs developed independently by health science faculty who have purchased multi-purpose videodiscs that demonstrate the flexibility of the multi-purpose or “generic”: collection concept.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document