EP-1079 ROLE OF NEOADJUVANT CHEMORADIATION IN LOCALLY ADVANCED UNRESECTABLE GALL BLADDER CANCERS

760 Background: Clinical benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) is still controversial in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME). We aim to explore the role of adjuvant chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidine for ypT0-3N0 patients. Methods: Patients with ypT0-3N0 rectal cancer after neoadjuvant CRT and TME were included using retrospective cohort of Yonsei Cancer Center. Patients were categorized according to receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC vs. no AC). Disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) between treatment groups were compared using all patients’ cohort (APC) and propensity score-matched patients’ cohort (PSMPC). Results: total of 339 patients were evaluated. Of all, 87 patients (25.7%) did not receive AC. There was no difference in DFS between two groups [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.079, p-value = 0.782 in APC; HR = 1.22, p-value in PSMPC]. Also there was no difference in OS between two groups (HR = 1.140, p-value 0.717 in APC; HR = 1.366, p-value 0.472 in PSMPC). Advanced T stage and positive resection margin were associated with inferior DFS and OS by multivariate analysis. In subgroup analysis by baseline characteristics, we could not find any group with benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusions: AC did not improve DFS and OS of patients with ypT0-3N0 rectal cancer after neoadjuvant CRT followed by TME. The role of AC in LARC with ypT0-3N0 after preoperative CRT should be evaluated in prospective randomized trials with larger sample size.

Download Full-text

The prognostic value of KRAS mutation in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.e15090 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e15090-e15090

Author(s):

Veli Bakalov ◽

Shaakir Hasan ◽

Stephen Abel ◽

Laila Babar ◽

Hira Shaikh ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Rectal Cancer ◽

Kras Mutation ◽

Prognostic Value ◽

Locally Advanced ◽

Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽

Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽

Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation ◽

Multivariable Analyses ◽

Male Sex

e15090 Background: The prognostic value and prognostic value of the KRAS proto-oncogene mutation in colorectal cancer has been debated. Herein, we analyzed the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to assess the role of KRAS mutation as a prognostic marker in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Methods: We identified LARC patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation from 2004-2015 excluding those with stage I/IV disease and unknown KRAS status.Multivariable logistic regression identified variables associated with KRAS positivity. Propensity adjusted univariable and multivariable analyses identified predictors of survival. Results: Of the 784 eligible patients, 506 and 278 were KRAS negative (KRAS-) and KRAS positive (KRAS+). Median survival was 63.6 months and 76.3 months for KRAS+ and KRAS-patients, with propensity adjusted 3 and 5-year survival of (79.9% vs. 83.6%) and (56.7% vs 61.9%) respectively (HR 1.56, p 1.074-2.272). Male sex, no insurance, and KRAS+ disease was associated with poorer survival on unadjusted and propensity adjusted multivariable analyses (Table). Conclusions: Our analysis of KRAS+ LARC suggest that KRAS+ disease is associated with poorer overall survival. Given the inherent limitations of retrospective data, prospective validation is warranted. [Table: see text]

Download Full-text

Impact of neoadjuvant radiation on survival in patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by pancreatectomy.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2019.37.4_suppl.453 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽

pp. 453-453 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Francis Igor Macedo ◽

Basem Azab ◽

Omar Picado ◽

Danny Yakoub ◽

Alan S Livingstone ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽

Cox Regression ◽

Locally Advanced ◽

Median Number ◽

Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation ◽

Borderline Resectable ◽

Kaplan Meier ◽

Dismal Prognosis ◽

Poorly Differentiated

453 Background: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) carries a dismal prognosis. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (NACR) has been introduced to enhance the outcomes of patients with borderline resectable and locally advanced PDAC, however the role of radiation therapy remains largely unknown. Methods: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for patients with stage I-III PDAC who underwent surgical resection from 2004 to 2014. Patients undergoing NACR were compared to those undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) alone. The association between clinical characteristics and overall survival (OS) was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox regression model. Results: Of 3,133 patients, 2,351 (75%) patients underwent NACR and 782 (25%), NAC alone. Most patients were Caucasians (84%), treated at academic institutions (67%) and underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (74%). Median follow-up time was 32 months (IQR, 22-50 months). Median number of lymph nodes examined (LNE) and number of positive nodes (NPN) were significantly decreased in NACR (13 vs. 16, p < 0.001 and 0 vs. 1, p < 0.001, respectively). Rates of margin positivity, median OS and 5-year OS were similar between 2 groups (NACR vs. NAC: 15% vs. 17%, p = 0.545; 25.7 months (95% CI 24.4–26.7) vs. 25.1 months (95% CI: 23.9–27.5), and 20% vs. 22%, p = 0.616, respectively, Figure 1). Subgroup analysis of high-risk features (R1/R2 and N1) also showed no difference in survival outcomes. Neoadjuvant radiation was not an independent predictor associated with OS, whereas advanced age, R1/R2, T3/T4, N1, and poorly differentiated histology were independent negative prognostic factors. Conclusions: NACR is associated with lower rates of lymph node positivity, however this did not translate in survival or margin positivity benefit compared to NAC alone. The role of radiotherapy in PDAC continues to evolve, however no convincing data is currently available to advocate the widespread use of radiotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting. Further evidence with prospective clinical trials is still warranted to confirm these findings.

Download Full-text